作者查詢 / carlforce

總覽項目：發文 | 留言 | 暱稱

作者 carlforce 在 PTT [ Warfare ] 看板的留言(推文), 共13則

限定看板：Warfare

看板排序：

全部TKU_HisSB1278Softball108NTNU-HisSB89TKU_StarSB45Macross41TKU_Talk34Adachi32historia22BBSmovie18TKU_HIS13Warfare13Asian-MLB8HisShark8Gossiping6graduate6KingdomHuang6MobileComm6nb-shopping6NARUTO5J-PopStation4NCCU_History4Notebook4PlayBaseball4chinese-ball3CHING3hypermall3MaiKuraki3movie3MSOESoftball3PHY_softball3sex3StatSoftball3TKU-ChemSB3YOLO3Boy-Girl2Bunco2FITNESS2HanshinTiger2HisSoftBall2maevsoftball2NCYU_HisGeo2NIUEE93a2NTUEE_POWER2SCU_CIS-92A2THU-P-Softbo2Vision2YZU_EE95B2AfterPhD1Ancient1asciiart1B95305XXX1CCF1CH7th3101CHITEE4UD90A1CHJHS13-3191civil951ck57th3151cksh79th011cksh84th3021CMCRX421CPU_PA7511CS_Softball1CSMU-D891CSMU-MED951CSMU-NT_BALL1CSU1CYCUEL95A1enlighten1FCU-PF20061FGU1FHSH-89-3161Fin-Softball1FJU-ACCR941FJU-EE-2005A1FJU-EE-BALL1FJU-Stat95A1FJU-STAT95B1FJU_SW_SBMan1FORMULA11Gemini1HisGeo_991HK-movie1HSNU_10951HSNU_10981HSNU_8971HTSH-7th3131Japandrama1Japanese-B941kaleidostar1KNU1KS94-3061KS94-3201KS95-3081KS95-3111KS95-3151KS96-3031LineageII1Master_D1MUSTMIS1NCCU06_STGAR1NCCU_KS61NCCU_Strive1NCHU-AGR981NCKU-Stat-941NCU95IE1NCU_Trans1NCULG1NDHU-His1011NDHU-His961NDHU-phy981NDMC-D621NDMC-D631NDMC-M1031NDMC-PH291NH11th3053091NHFC1NIU-ECE94b1NTHU-MSE091ntnu_math_sb1NTOU-MME-99B1NTPU-NSTAT931NTU-K101NTUCL-ST1NTUEE1101NTUEOE_R306A1NTUHistory981NTUST-EE-B911NTUT_MMRE931NY-Yankees1NYUST93_MBA1PCCU-CS1Phy-Softball1PlayStation1Psy-Team1PushDoll1RSSH94_3011RyokoHirosue1Saiunkoku1SayLove1SCU_LawFB1SSSH-12th3041STDM-93-31A1Suckcomic1TA_AN1TamShui1TFSHS66th3181THUAS_931TKU-RUGBY1TKU-Softball1TKU-TIBXM1TKU_CE94C1TKU_EW94B1TKU_INS1TKU_STAT_SB1TKU_trans1Tsao1TTSH_73121TunHua10t3031Uni-Service1Viator96Chia1Virgo1weiyin1WUFU92-3221YMU_bioMed961YZU-EE95A1<< 收起看板(165)

首頁

尾頁

Re: [閒聊] 佛朗機炮影片

[ Warfare ]6 留言, 推噓總分: 0

作者: reinherd - 發表於 2013/10/29 12:11(10年前)

6^F→carlforce:《佛郎機銃在中國》2013/06/01 http://0rz.tw/L1FyS10/29 21:53

Re: [問題] 當初日本豐臣秀吉 VS 明朝軍隊雙方各ꠠ…

[ Warfare ]34 留言, 推噓總分: +4

作者: ThomasJP - 發表於 2010/03/22 11:55(14年前)

1^F→carlforce:(拜讀03/22 12:03

5^F推carlforce:對事不對人,小弟修掉最後一次提供些文章給大家看看03/22 12:08

8^F→carlforce:各種論文的內容當然有正確有錯誤,但至少經過學術審核03/22 12:09

11^F→carlforce:如有翻案文章,或是這幾篇文章的評論,小弟也虛心拜讀03/22 12:10

12^F→carlforce:但是目前小弟沒看到就是03/22 12:11

17^F→carlforce:小弟的焦點在 "戰車"並未在清代以前的中國戰場消失03/22 12:12

18^F→carlforce:或許我們對冷熱兵器形式的"戰車"認定不同吧03/22 12:13

21^F推carlforce:小弟哪句話寫了坦克同馬車? :)03/22 12:17

23^F推carlforce:那是該作者在結論部分的延伸討論,沒有完整文句是會讓您03/22 12:22

24^F→carlforce:有這種觀感,謝謝您的指正,小弟繼續龜在圖書館補充學識03/22 12:23

25^F→carlforce:End03/22 12:24

Re: [問題] 古代戰車的威力真的很大嗎？

[ Warfare ]7 留言, 推噓總分: +6

作者: ThomasJP - 發表於 2010/03/13 10:05(14年前)

7^F→carlforce:能夠衝鋒的才是"戰車" ?(筆記03/13 17:04

首頁

尾頁