作者查詢 / biostar
作者 biostar 在 PTT [ EarthScience ] 看板的留言(推文), 共299則
限定看板:EarthScience
看板排序:
全部Gossiping5309TY_Research4389bicycle1486PH-sea781sky313EarthScience299Plant270CMWang233DSLR186L_TalkandCha152GossipPicket129NY-Yankees118Hiking105SYSOP65Stock53MRT51Flickr43Sangokumusou43mobile-game41HatePolitics36DIABLO33GIEE_9933Biology31I-Lan30Arthropoda29LAW25bicycle-tour23media-chaos17TFSHS67th30916Browsers14Facebook13MLB13WomenTalk13FLAT_CLUB12BoardCourt11Civil11Isayama11PublicIssue11ck51st31810LineGames10Road_Running10Google9Note8PCSH91_3058WorldCup8ASHS-93-li7Ecophilia6FestivalPark6FuMouDiscuss6Physics6RIPE_gender6Teacher6CaoCao5EmailYang5Ironman5RedSox5Salary5StupidClown5TNFSH98th5Violation5AfterPhD4DPP4Emergency4home-sale4joke4NCUE4NTUCivilism4pighead4PttHistory4TigerBlue4TSU4Yunlin4ck50th3233ck58th3023Hualien3ID_Multi3iOS3KOU3Militarylife3NTU3politics3TWICE3Beauty2FTV2GreenParty2historia2Hunter2Jinmen2Keelung2MKSH50th3062NCHU-AE992NTUHASSE2Oceanography2Option2PT-932R983220PA2Road2Taitung2Terry2toberich2Warfare2b982040XX1Baseball1BigSanchung1Calligraphy1CCU-GIE971CSMU-MT991CYCU_Talk1Economics1FHB-TEAM1Golf1HCKuo1HOTPINK1HsinTien1IA1INSECT1J-PopStation1juniorhigh1KMT1KOTDFansClub1KS98-3021Marginalman1MdnCNhistory1Miaoli1MobileComm1movie1NBAEasyChat1NCCU_trans1NCHU-CE-421NCU97ME-B1NCU_ES1NHU_Talk1NTUBST991NTUGIEER3291Olympics_ISG1PlayStation1ScenicPhoto1SCU_FLES1SENIORHIGH1SouthPark1specialman1StarCraft1Surf1TaichungCont1Taipei1TamShui1Tech_Job1TW-GHONOR1Windows1WOW1WuGu-BaLi1<< 收起看板(151)
1F推:好像跟地球科學沒啥關係?不過板主的文章還是給推06/29 10:53
4F推:古生物主要是生物學的演化學範圍06/29 23:33
5F→:而且這篇主要講的是用分子生物觀點去切入,跟地質比較無關06/29 23:35
6F推:古生物學和地球科學之間是彼此互相支援驗證的關係06/29 23:38
2F推:雖然「立委減半,垃圾減半」,可是偏偏剩下那一半還是垃圾06/19 00:07
7F→:不是改變"人為定義",就能改變這個山坡坍塌或不坍塌的可能06/15 14:03
10F推:山坡是否具有坍塌危險,應該不是只有傾斜角度這因素吧?06/16 00:10
11F推:發現現在官員都很厲害耶!不用環評就知道會不會影響環境,06/16 00:23
12F→:免生態調查就知道溼地蛇比鷺鷥多,免地質調查就知道安不安06/16 00:24
13F→:全。既然他們都這麼厲害,俺的生態科系也可以不用招生了06/16 00:25
11F推:地球的磁場也會有週期性的短暫消失,可是水量並沒啥變化啊06/16 00:28
1F推:國道走山事件時,講得很好聽,等新聞一過,狗改不了吃屎06/09 06:35
29F推:那個區域記得是以石灰岩為主,石灰岩本來就很容易被地下水06/05 17:44
30F→:侵蝕而出現地下洞穴,然後某個事件後,上方撐不住而崩塌06/05 17:46
31F→:然後露出地下已經形成很久的地下石灰岩洞穴06/05 17:46
2F推:貓纜規劃時,除了沒有環境影響評估,地質評估不知有沒有?05/31 16:55
3F推:當初沒好好問過地質技師怎麼設計比較好 出事就推給天災05/05 06:58
10F推:要人家遷村,總是得要安排住處和工作,總不能叫他們去當05/05 16:40
11F→:無業的街友吧?變成這樣對他們有比較好嗎?05/05 16:40
6F推:養護路權範圍怎麼訂定的?有問過真正的地質專家嗎?05/02 15:09
7F→:雖然在養護路權範圍外,但還是會造成道路危害,就不用管?05/02 15:10