作者查詢 / bearattacks
作者 bearattacks 在 PTT 全部看板的留言(推文), 共101則
限定看板:全部
看板排序:
3F→: 謝謝回答 不好意思想再請問一下有限制申請幾個系嗎?05/28 00:49
4F→: 不知道是不是我眼殘 簡章上好像沒有說05/28 00:50
2F→: 不是 現在不餓也不渴05/18 04:50
7F→: 沒:( 而且晚上還有去補習班上課05/18 13:41
7F→: 原來我朋友沒在豪洨XD05/18 02:13
8F→: 長見識了 謝啦大家05/18 02:13
3F→: 真的 之前有次看有個小朋友在玩 過去搭話後被他媽媽04/29 16:02
4F→: 用詭異的眼神盯 以後看到有人在玩就不太敢隨意搭話了04/29 16:02
2F→: 是喔04/25 12:08
3F→: 因為我想說覺得自己正直的黃春明都沒有婚後跟其他女04/25 12:09
4F→: 人性交是不行的這個念頭04/25 12:09
5F→: 那想必這個問題當時並不存在04/25 12:09
10F→: 不好意思我搞錯了 在這篇短文中 主角叫“黃君” 寫法04/25 13:15
11F→: 又是第一人稱 所以記憶有點模糊自動帶入為黃春明04/25 13:15
12F→: 但問題還是沒變 小說中作者描述主角黃君是一位道德感04/25 13:19
13F→: 民族意識很重的人04/25 13:19
14F→: 為什麼並沒有在結了婚還想嫖妓這塊著墨呢?是因為那04/25 13:20
15F→: 時並沒有這樣不行的問題?04/25 13:20
19F→: 是的 可是當他在掙扎時內心有很多掙扎的理由 如他以04/25 13:38
20F→: 前是老師或他帶日本人來嫖 自己也跟著嫖嗎?04/25 13:38
22F→: 但就是沒有把我結婚了考慮進去04/25 13:38
24F→: 我並沒有在問是否可以嫖妓04/25 13:40
25F→: 而是在問那時候是否有已婚不應該嫖妓這個觀點04/25 13:40
27F→: 不知道你是否在說笑 但不是每一家都可以悵然自若跟04/25 13:42
28F→: 長輩親戚討論嫖妓或道德問題04/25 13:42
32F→: 有 我看到了 只是樣本數不夠 還是沒法定論04/25 14:07
34F→: 請問你是說1973年那時候嗎?04/25 18:59
6F→: Why? Why "should"?04/25 13:03
7F→: Is that their job? Their responsibilities? There'04/25 13:03
8F→: s no "should"04/25 13:03
9F→: If you think they are unforgiving or stingy just04/25 13:04
10F→: because04/25 13:04
11F→: they don't do what they "should" do, which is, as04/25 13:05
12F→: your words, show guidence and salvation to anyon04/25 13:05
13F→: e that needs them. Then take my advice, don't tak04/25 13:05
14F→: e anything for granted.04/25 13:05
15F→: EARN IT!04/25 13:05
19F→: First, go with respect and do your homework. In y04/25 19:11
20F→: our post, you said you were trolling around and y04/25 19:11
21F→: ou didn't even know who you were praying to.04/25 19:11
22F→: If you were god, would you take man with that kin04/25 19:14
23F→: d of attitude seriously?04/25 19:14
36F→: Tell me, would the gods of yours take you if you05/01 02:09
37F→: talked to them disrespectfully and sometimes did05/01 02:09
38F→: n't even admit their existence?05/01 02:09
39F→: And btw, no, they are not exactly the same as us.05/01 02:14
40F→: What makes you make that conclusion?05/01 02:14
41F→: They have emotions like us. And yet they have som05/01 02:16
42F→: ething we don't.05/01 02:16
43F→: Almighty05/01 02:16
44F→: That's the biggest reason (well…maybe the only r05/01 02:17
45F→: eason) why we ask them for help.05/01 02:17
46F→: Not because they "provide guidence"05/01 02:21
47F→: It's because they are all knowing so the guidence05/01 02:25
48F→: they provide can solve your question.05/01 02:25
49F→: Hell your dad probably can provide you tons of gu05/01 02:33
50F→: idece, why don't you worship him like you worship05/01 02:33
51F→: gods?05/01 02:33
56F→: Oh? Don't waste both of our time.05/01 20:27
57F→: Either spit it out clearly or shush.05/01 20:27
60F→: Why not? It's fun to state opinions and see why s05/01 23:17
61F→: ome people disagree. Why they think differently?05/01 23:17
62F→: And it's not like we didn't get anything out of o05/01 23:18
63F→: ur argument. We both have practiced our written e05/01 23:18
64F→: xpressions through it. lol05/01 23:18
65F→: Don't worry about us. :)05/01 23:18
66F→: We are both grown ups. A little verbal fight can'05/01 23:20
67F→: t hurt.05/01 23:20
68F→: Well, I can't speak for Allen. Maybe he or she is05/01 23:23
69F→: not. IDK05/01 23:23
73F→: Yes, of course, blame others. The reason why this05/04 02:12
74F→: world is at peace is because of you.05/04 02:12
75F→: I'm not justifying myself. I'm sorry if you find05/04 02:18
76F→: my words offensive. But the attitude you give ou05/04 02:18
77F→: t is the same attitude you will get back.05/04 02:18
78F→: Now, do you wish to continue the discussion? I do05/04 02:19
79F→: n't think it is going anywhere. Apparently you ca05/04 02:19
80F→: n't accept my thoughts, and vice versa.05/04 02:19
5F→: 相信你衝了大家也會跟著衝 上啊04/22 10:20
39F噓: 這就是看八卦版看久被洗腦的後遺症04/22 10:03
680F推: 晚上-我最想看柯p用阿卡貝拉唱sugar04/23 11:49
6F→: 感謝大家回答04/19 17:59
7F→: 但獨立調查為什麼要要求政府執行?04/19 18:00
8F→: 這樣不就還是由政府主導?04/19 18:03
12F→: 大概懂了 謝謝回答04/20 00:14