Re: [轉錄]Re: [影片] 彼得潘的真相
作者: lcp (............) 看板: AAAAAAAA
標題: Re: [影片] 彼得潘的真相
時間: Sun Jun 4 02:22:40 2006
我有個疑問:
節目中節錄了兩句話,根據我 google 過後的結果
"when they seem to be growing up, which is against the rules"
這句話是在 chapter 5
而
"and Peter was killing them off vindictively as fast as possible."
這句話卻是在 chapter 11
把這兩句差這麼遠的句子湊在一起不是很奇怪嗎?
另外看一下這兩句的上下文:
All wanted blood except the boys, who liked it as a rule, but to-night
were out to greet their captain. The boys on the island vary, of course,
in numbers, according as they get killed and so on; and when they seem
to be growing up, which is against the rules, Peter thins them out; but
at this time there were six of them, counting the twins as two. Let us
pretend to lie here among the sugar-cane and watch them as they steal by
in single file, each with his hand on his dagger.
===
But of course he cared very much; and he was so full of wrath against
grown-ups, who, as usual, were spoiling everything, that as soon as he
got inside his tree he breathed intentionally quick short breaths at the
rate of about five to a second. He did this because there is a saying in
the Neverland that, every time you breathe, a grown-up dies; and Peter
was killing them off vindictively as fast as possible.
總覺得只是島上的傳說而已,有沒有高手可以說明一下@@
--
Peter Pan 原文:
http://www.pinkmonkey.com/dl/library1/book0218.pdf
--
Picasso -
"Good artists copy, great artists steal."
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢兔(ptt2.cc)
◆ From: 61.229.68.66
→
06/04 04:04,
06/04 04:04
搜尋了一下,我找到的好像都是 1904 的版本........~"~
→
06/04 04:09,
06/04 04:09
我另外找的的一篇跟那個節目有關的評論:
http://www.greggman.com/edit/editheadlines/2004-10-27.htm
裡面有:
Peter Pan isn't already without its controversy
可能 Peter Pan 真的有些爭議吧...........
→
06/04 04:17,
06/04 04:17
沒錯,節目中節錄的上下文很可疑,造假的成份居多
→
06/04 04:24,
06/04 04:24
我也希望是假的,一個童話人物如果就這樣背上殺人的污名,我覺得很可憐......
→
06/04 04:24,
06/04 04:24
→
06/04 04:33,
06/04 04:33
→
06/04 04:33,
06/04 04:33
→
06/04 04:34,
06/04 04:34
→
06/04 05:07,
06/04 05:07
→
06/04 05:08,
06/04 05:08
看來只有找出 1911 年的 Peter Pan 才能知道真相了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.62.130.12
※ 編輯: kakakaka 來自: 61.62.130.12 (06/04 13:45)
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 9 篇):