對應40+新球的皮有哪張特別紅的嗎?
新球上路已經過了一年
幾乎各家廠牌都出了對應新球的膠皮,除了蝴蝶
終於蝴蝶也即將推出Bryce high speed先不說
德系對應新球stiga最前推出了Airoc
Andro也出了改版的Rasant Grip
Joola出了Rhyzm,Donic出了P系列,F1 plus
Nittaku也出了P1,Yasaka RX
這些新皮到底有沒有比舊有的好打?真的是打個問號
有些皮我沒打過就不評論
我只確定RX一定有比R9好打些,但一般業餘其實或許R7更習慣
Nittaku P1對應40+新球?但好像G1的質量還是比較好哩
Donic新的皮有比M2紅嗎?看起來也沒有
Tibhar的MXS,嗯....好像不如MXP、ELP耶
Rhyzm沒打過,但Xplode sensitive我覺得真的很好打
至於有沒有哪張新皮可以幹掉Tenergy?依然沒有!
T64有些被T80取代,但T05的地位還是很穩(太誇張了,這是2008年的產品)
我不知道這些新皮為什麼紅不起來
對應新球的需求到底是要增加什麼?
加快速度,就不咬球;海綿改軟一點,質量又比原來差
不知道各位看法怎樣
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 211.76.92.175
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/tabletennis/M.1446052351.A.3AA.html
推
10/29 01:16, , 1F
10/29 01:16, 1F
→
10/29 01:17, , 2F
10/29 01:17, 2F
→
10/29 01:20, , 3F
10/29 01:20, 3F
推
10/29 09:46, , 4F
10/29 09:46, 4F
→
10/29 09:46, , 5F
10/29 09:46, 5F
推
10/29 13:37, , 6F
10/29 13:37, 6F
→
10/29 14:00, , 7F
10/29 14:00, 7F
推
10/29 15:44, , 8F
10/29 15:44, 8F
→
10/29 15:45, , 9F
10/29 15:45, 9F
推
10/29 16:09, , 10F
10/29 16:09, 10F
→
10/29 16:09, , 11F
10/29 16:09, 11F
推
10/29 16:53, , 12F
10/29 16:53, 12F
推
10/29 17:18, , 13F
10/29 17:18, 13F
→
10/29 18:44, , 14F
10/29 18:44, 14F
→
10/29 18:45, , 15F
10/29 18:45, 15F
推
10/29 21:09, , 16F
10/29 21:09, 16F
推
10/29 21:14, , 17F
10/29 21:14, 17F
→
10/29 21:17, , 18F
10/29 21:17, 18F
→
10/29 21:19, , 19F
10/29 21:19, 19F
推
10/29 22:06, , 20F
10/29 22:06, 20F
→
10/29 22:07, , 21F
10/29 22:07, 21F
→
10/29 22:07, , 22F
10/29 22:07, 22F
→
10/29 22:55, , 23F
10/29 22:55, 23F
推
10/29 23:03, , 24F
10/29 23:03, 24F
→
10/29 23:04, , 25F
10/29 23:04, 25F
→
10/29 23:04, , 26F
10/29 23:04, 26F
→
10/29 23:05, , 27F
10/29 23:05, 27F
→
10/29 23:05, , 28F
10/29 23:05, 28F
→
10/29 23:06, , 29F
10/29 23:06, 29F
→
10/29 23:09, , 30F
10/29 23:09, 30F
推
10/29 23:18, , 31F
10/29 23:18, 31F
→
10/29 23:18, , 32F
10/29 23:18, 32F
→
10/29 23:19, , 33F
10/29 23:19, 33F
→
10/29 23:20, , 34F
10/29 23:20, 34F
→
10/29 23:20, , 35F
10/29 23:20, 35F
→
10/29 23:21, , 36F
10/29 23:21, 36F
→
10/29 23:22, , 37F
10/29 23:22, 37F
→
10/29 23:24, , 38F
10/29 23:24, 38F
→
10/30 00:21, , 39F
10/30 00:21, 39F
→
10/30 00:23, , 40F
10/30 00:23, 40F
推
10/30 00:25, , 41F
10/30 00:25, 41F
→
10/30 00:26, , 42F
10/30 00:26, 42F
→
10/30 01:51, , 43F
10/30 01:51, 43F
→
10/30 01:52, , 44F
10/30 01:52, 44F
推
10/30 08:56, , 45F
10/30 08:56, 45F
→
10/30 08:56, , 46F
10/30 08:56, 46F
推
10/30 09:00, , 47F
10/30 09:00, 47F
→
10/30 09:00, , 48F
10/30 09:00, 48F
→
10/30 13:43, , 49F
10/30 13:43, 49F
→
10/30 13:44, , 50F
10/30 13:44, 50F
推
10/30 14:11, , 51F
10/30 14:11, 51F
推
11/03 15:55, , 52F
11/03 15:55, 52F
推
07/20 16:14, , 53F
07/20 16:14, 53F
→
07/20 16:14, , 54F
07/20 16:14, 54F
→
07/20 16:14, , 55F
07/20 16:14, 55F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):