Re: [情報] 可能的話還是把護照換一換吧!
不好意思,容我糾正你一下,關於免簽證的事情,我必須跟你說完全是你的錯,
不要又弄成台灣被中國,被外國人欺負打壓了.關於免簽的規定,你必須使用
台北核發,註有身分證字號的新版護照.按理說,這個版本應該都
是最近三年左右發的,因此也剛好都會註上"Taiwan"二字.你女友的護照上面
沒有加註,估計發照日至少都是四年以上,或是外館發的舊版本.
人家之所以給台灣免簽原因之一,是因為台灣新版的護照規格符合國際標準.
跟到底是Taiwan還是China無關,不要太敏感了.當然海關可能根本也搞不清
楚台灣有這本舊版護照,所以才跟妳解釋錯誤.但是我要說的是,完全是你不
合規定在先,就算海關認得這是台灣的護照,你的護照仍然不合規定.
出發前應該要查閱外交部網站的相關說明.不要把這件很單純的事情又搞成台
灣人被欺負了.是你沒有照規定來.
下面附上外交部的網站,希望大家在準備出發前可以認真的做好功課,免簽證
是新聞講的,但不代表免簽證就是什麼表格什麼資料都不需要準備好.
http://www.boca.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=296&CtUnit=14&BaseDSD=13&mp=1
*剛剛那篇文章看到有人轉八卦了,我敢說有會有人開始吵阿共打壓了~~
*這是加拿大免簽的規定:
http://www.boca.gov.tw/ct.asp?BaseDSD=13&CuItem=175&CtUnit=18&mp=1
*這是上面的說明:
目前加國予我國人之免簽證待遇,仍僅適用於我外交部在台北核發且
載有身分證字號之我國普通護照,至於我駐外館處核發之護照,現階
段並不適用免簽入境加拿大。
--
★人生中最溫暖的夏天是在紐約的冬天★
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 128.120.178.195
※ 編輯: pipidog 來自: 128.120.178.195 (02/02 13:28)
推
02/02 13:25, , 1F
02/02 13:25, 1F
※ 編輯: pipidog 來自: 128.120.178.195 (02/02 13:30)
推
02/02 13:29, , 2F
02/02 13:29, 2F
→
02/02 13:29, , 3F
02/02 13:29, 3F
→
02/02 13:29, , 4F
02/02 13:29, 4F
→
02/02 13:30, , 5F
02/02 13:30, 5F
推
02/02 13:32, , 6F
02/02 13:32, 6F
→
02/02 13:34, , 7F
02/02 13:34, 7F
→
02/02 13:34, , 8F
02/02 13:34, 8F
→
02/02 13:35, , 9F
02/02 13:35, 9F
→
02/02 13:36, , 10F
02/02 13:36, 10F
→
02/02 13:36, , 11F
02/02 13:36, 11F
→
02/02 13:36, , 12F
02/02 13:36, 12F
推
02/02 13:38, , 13F
02/02 13:38, 13F
→
02/02 13:39, , 14F
02/02 13:39, 14F
→
02/02 13:43, , 15F
02/02 13:43, 15F
推
02/02 13:50, , 16F
02/02 13:50, 16F
→
02/02 13:51, , 17F
02/02 13:51, 17F
推
02/02 14:14, , 18F
02/02 14:14, 18F
→
02/02 14:15, , 19F
02/02 14:15, 19F
推
02/02 14:21, , 20F
02/02 14:21, 20F
推
02/02 14:36, , 21F
02/02 14:36, 21F
→
02/02 14:36, , 22F
02/02 14:36, 22F
推
02/02 14:58, , 23F
02/02 14:58, 23F
→
02/02 14:58, , 24F
02/02 14:58, 24F
→
02/02 14:59, , 25F
02/02 14:59, 25F
→
02/02 14:59, , 26F
02/02 14:59, 26F
→
02/02 15:02, , 27F
02/02 15:02, 27F
→
02/02 15:02, , 28F
02/02 15:02, 28F
→
02/02 15:05, , 29F
02/02 15:05, 29F
推
02/02 15:06, , 30F
02/02 15:06, 30F
→
02/02 15:07, , 31F
02/02 15:07, 31F
→
02/02 15:08, , 32F
02/02 15:08, 32F
→
02/02 15:08, , 33F
02/02 15:08, 33F
→
02/02 15:10, , 34F
02/02 15:10, 34F
→
02/02 15:11, , 35F
02/02 15:11, 35F
→
02/02 15:11, , 36F
02/02 15:11, 36F
→
02/02 15:12, , 37F
02/02 15:12, 37F
→
02/02 15:13, , 38F
02/02 15:13, 38F
→
02/02 15:13, , 39F
02/02 15:13, 39F
推
02/02 15:54, , 40F
02/02 15:54, 40F
推
02/02 16:11, , 41F
02/02 16:11, 41F
推
02/02 19:23, , 42F
02/02 19:23, 42F
→
02/02 19:24, , 43F
02/02 19:24, 43F
→
02/02 19:24, , 44F
02/02 19:24, 44F
推
02/02 19:59, , 45F
02/02 19:59, 45F
→
02/02 20:55, , 46F
02/02 20:55, 46F
→
02/02 20:55, , 47F
02/02 20:55, 47F
→
02/02 21:49, , 48F
02/02 21:49, 48F
→
02/02 21:49, , 49F
02/02 21:49, 49F
推
02/02 22:15, , 50F
02/02 22:15, 50F
推
02/02 22:21, , 51F
02/02 22:21, 51F
→
02/02 22:22, , 52F
02/02 22:22, 52F
→
02/02 22:23, , 53F
02/02 22:23, 53F
→
02/02 22:24, , 54F
02/02 22:24, 54F
推
02/03 00:08, , 55F
02/03 00:08, 55F
推
02/03 00:08, , 56F
02/03 00:08, 56F
→
02/03 00:09, , 57F
02/03 00:09, 57F
推
02/03 00:18, , 58F
02/03 00:18, 58F
→
02/03 02:23, , 59F
02/03 02:23, 59F
→
02/03 02:23, , 60F
02/03 02:23, 60F
推
02/03 02:25, , 61F
02/03 02:25, 61F
推
02/03 02:43, , 62F
02/03 02:43, 62F
→
02/03 02:44, , 63F
02/03 02:44, 63F
→
02/03 02:45, , 64F
02/03 02:45, 64F
→
02/03 02:58, , 65F
02/03 02:58, 65F
→
02/03 02:59, , 66F
02/03 02:59, 66F
推
02/03 03:18, , 67F
02/03 03:18, 67F
推
02/03 04:31, , 68F
02/03 04:31, 68F
→
02/03 10:08, , 69F
02/03 10:08, 69F
→
02/03 10:09, , 70F
02/03 10:09, 70F
噓
02/03 23:47, , 71F
02/03 23:47, 71F
→
02/04 01:21, , 72F
02/04 01:21, 72F
推
02/04 18:20, , 73F
02/04 18:20, 73F
推
02/05 01:35, , 74F
02/05 01:35, 74F
推
02/05 02:20, , 75F
02/05 02:20, 75F
推
02/05 11:16, , 76F
02/05 11:16, 76F
→
02/06 00:16, , 77F
02/06 00:16, 77F
→
02/06 11:24, , 78F
02/06 11:24, 78F
推
02/06 14:32, , 79F
02/06 14:32, 79F
推
02/07 14:04, , 80F
02/07 14:04, 80F
→
02/07 14:04, , 81F
02/07 14:04, 81F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 6 篇):