Re: [新聞]前蜘蛛女轟《蜘蛛人》重啟只為圈錢!!!!
很好奇蜘蛛人3有那麼爛嗎
為什麼會這樣問是因為
1. 可能當時年紀還只是高中而已對爽片接受度很高,走出來是覺得好看...
但印象超深刻,過了三周我也是興高采烈跑去看世界的盡頭
看到整個睡著...
結果神鬼現在都出到找黃秋生了 蜘蛛人還在換小鮮肉
2. 以票房來看,8.9億鎂在那個年代,蜘蛛人3也算是非常非常高的票房吧
就算再難看,片商看到票房好不都會繼續出續集
印象中鋼鐵人2 雷神索爾2 美隊1口碑也都不盡理想
真正毀了蜘蛛人的是加菲貓系列的導演跟索尼的高層吧...
迪士尼的高層好像心臟比較大
PS 可能現在很多學生沒看過,但一直認為要不是有陶比蜘蛛人系列
現在根本不會有漫威風潮...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.246.227.163
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/movie/M.1501668096.A.985.html
推
08/02 18:10, , 1F
08/02 18:10, 1F
→
08/02 18:10, , 2F
08/02 18:10, 2F
推
08/02 18:13, , 3F
08/02 18:13, 3F
推
08/02 18:13, , 4F
08/02 18:13, 4F
→
08/02 18:14, , 5F
08/02 18:14, 5F
→
08/02 18:15, , 6F
08/02 18:15, 6F
→
08/02 18:15, , 7F
08/02 18:15, 7F
應該說我最大的疑問點是
只是因為一個點"口碑差"就放棄陶比嗎?
還是有其他掛
※ 編輯: g13290407 (111.246.227.163), 08/02/2017 18:20:10
→
08/02 18:21, , 8F
08/02 18:21, 8F
推
08/02 18:29, , 9F
08/02 18:29, 9F
→
08/02 18:29, , 10F
08/02 18:29, 10F
推
08/02 18:45, , 11F
08/02 18:45, 11F
→
08/02 18:49, , 12F
08/02 18:49, 12F
推
08/02 19:01, , 13F
08/02 19:01, 13F
推
08/02 19:05, , 14F
08/02 19:05, 14F
推
08/02 19:06, , 15F
08/02 19:06, 15F
噓
08/02 19:19, , 16F
08/02 19:19, 16F
推
08/02 19:50, , 17F
08/02 19:50, 17F
→
08/02 19:50, , 18F
08/02 19:50, 18F
推
08/02 20:06, , 19F
08/02 20:06, 19F
推
08/02 20:12, , 20F
08/02 20:12, 20F
推
08/02 20:27, , 21F
08/02 20:27, 21F
推
08/02 20:28, , 22F
08/02 20:28, 22F
→
08/02 20:29, , 23F
08/02 20:29, 23F
→
08/02 20:31, , 24F
08/02 20:31, 24F
→
08/02 20:47, , 25F
08/02 20:47, 25F
推
08/02 20:50, , 26F
08/02 20:50, 26F
→
08/02 20:51, , 27F
08/02 20:51, 27F
推
08/02 20:52, , 28F
08/02 20:52, 28F
推
08/02 20:57, , 29F
08/02 20:57, 29F
推
08/02 20:59, , 30F
08/02 20:59, 30F
→
08/02 21:00, , 31F
08/02 21:00, 31F
→
08/02 21:00, , 32F
08/02 21:00, 32F
推
08/02 21:04, , 33F
08/02 21:04, 33F
推
08/02 21:14, , 34F
08/02 21:14, 34F
推
08/02 21:14, , 35F
08/02 21:14, 35F
→
08/02 21:14, , 36F
08/02 21:14, 36F
→
08/02 21:15, , 37F
08/02 21:15, 37F
→
08/02 21:16, , 38F
08/02 21:16, 38F
→
08/02 21:16, , 39F
08/02 21:16, 39F
噓
08/02 21:20, , 40F
08/02 21:20, 40F
推
08/02 21:27, , 41F
08/02 21:27, 41F
→
08/02 21:28, , 42F
08/02 21:28, 42F
推
08/02 22:33, , 43F
08/02 22:33, 43F
推
08/03 00:59, , 44F
08/03 00:59, 44F
→
08/03 00:59, , 45F
08/03 00:59, 45F
推
08/03 01:17, , 46F
08/03 01:17, 46F
→
08/03 01:31, , 47F
08/03 01:31, 47F
推
08/03 01:42, , 48F
08/03 01:42, 48F
→
08/03 01:44, , 49F
08/03 01:44, 49F
推
08/03 01:49, , 50F
08/03 01:49, 50F
→
08/03 01:50, , 51F
08/03 01:50, 51F
推
08/03 02:13, , 52F
08/03 02:13, 52F
→
08/03 02:14, , 53F
08/03 02:14, 53F
→
08/03 02:34, , 54F
08/03 02:34, 54F
→
08/03 02:34, , 55F
08/03 02:34, 55F
推
08/03 03:06, , 56F
08/03 03:06, 56F
→
08/03 03:06, , 57F
08/03 03:06, 57F
→
08/03 03:07, , 58F
08/03 03:07, 58F
推
08/03 06:45, , 59F
08/03 06:45, 59F
推
08/03 08:38, , 60F
08/03 08:38, 60F
推
08/03 09:12, , 61F
08/03 09:12, 61F
推
08/03 10:10, , 62F
08/03 10:10, 62F
推
08/03 10:31, , 63F
08/03 10:31, 63F
推
08/03 10:42, , 64F
08/03 10:42, 64F
→
08/03 11:16, , 65F
08/03 11:16, 65F
噓
08/04 02:21, , 66F
08/04 02:21, 66F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 3 篇):