Re: [討論] 最近攻擊屍速的人明顯變多了?
這就是人性呀,現在這個風頭上
如果你發了一篇屍速的好雷
除非文章真的寫的很用心
有獨到而且新穎的見解
否則十之八九沒人會理你
不用一天就沉到看不見了
但只要發一篇負雷
而且跟本不用認真的寫心得
隨便屁兩句就一堆人高潮
趕著要噓你要回文反駁你
要刷存在感還有比這更輕鬆省事的嗎
就好像
當初寶可夢正發燒時,會有一些藝人
跳出來呼籲大家不要玩寶可夢一樣,
說穿了只不過,沒人想理你
覺得無聊想刷存在感罷了
不是說大家都給好雷就不能給負雷
但你要寫負雷文,至少也認真點
你發文章肚子有沒有墨水
其它人又不是瞎子會看不出來?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 115.82.48.42
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/movie/M.1473951636.A.38E.html
推
09/15 23:02, , 1F
09/15 23:02, 1F
→
09/15 23:04, , 2F
09/15 23:04, 2F
※ 編輯: mikiup0321 (115.82.48.42), 09/15/2016 23:07:45
推
09/15 23:06, , 3F
09/15 23:06, 3F
→
09/15 23:07, , 4F
09/15 23:07, 4F
→
09/15 23:15, , 5F
09/15 23:15, 5F
推
09/15 23:16, , 6F
09/15 23:16, 6F
推
09/15 23:21, , 7F
09/15 23:21, 7F
因為沒料的好雷才不會有人理
不是說好雷就可以沒料
→
09/15 23:24, , 8F
09/15 23:24, 8F
那篇只是不無腦
但還是沒啥料,他講的負雷原因
早被一堆人反駁了
※ 編輯: mikiup0321 (115.82.48.42), 09/15/2016 23:30:36
推
09/15 23:30, , 9F
09/15 23:30, 9F
→
09/15 23:30, , 10F
09/15 23:30, 10F
問題是誰規定喪屍片一定要討論怎麼感染的?
誰 規 定 的 ?
※ 編輯: mikiup0321 (115.82.48.42), 09/15/2016 23:32:45
推
09/15 23:31, , 11F
09/15 23:31, 11F
→
09/15 23:32, , 12F
09/15 23:32, 12F
這跟神邏輯無關,你覺得那篇寫的好
不代表我就不能說他沒料
就好像我覺得好片,不代表你不能覺得爛片
→
09/15 23:34, , 13F
09/15 23:34, 13F
※ 編輯: mikiup0321 (115.82.48.42), 09/15/2016 23:37:32
→
09/15 23:35, , 14F
09/15 23:35, 14F
是沒這個規定,但肚子沒墨水被噓暴活該
→
09/15 23:42, , 15F
09/15 23:42, 15F
別人說好看,你就硬說爛,是不是也同樣不經思考?
→
09/15 23:44, , 16F
09/15 23:44, 16F
要看風向啦,如果這時有人po大顯神威的好雷文。
偏偏內容空洞像廢文,我想要噓的不會客氣
※ 編輯: mikiup0321 (115.82.48.42), 09/15/2016 23:46:28
推
09/15 23:46, , 17F
09/15 23:46, 17F
邏輯不通,任何電影拍出來就應當可受公評
同理可證,任何負雷文敢寫出來自然也可受公評
※ 編輯: mikiup0321 (115.82.48.42), 09/15/2016 23:48:25
推
09/15 23:50, , 18F
09/15 23:50, 18F
推
09/15 23:51, , 19F
09/15 23:51, 19F
→
09/15 23:53, , 20F
09/15 23:53, 20F
噓
09/16 00:25, , 21F
09/16 00:25, 21F
推
09/16 00:36, , 22F
09/16 00:36, 22F
推
09/16 00:36, , 23F
09/16 00:36, 23F
推
09/16 00:46, , 24F
09/16 00:46, 24F
→
09/16 00:47, , 25F
09/16 00:47, 25F
推
09/16 01:09, , 26F
09/16 01:09, 26F
推
09/16 01:12, , 27F
09/16 01:12, 27F
→
09/16 01:13, , 28F
09/16 01:13, 28F
→
09/16 01:14, , 29F
09/16 01:14, 29F
→
09/16 01:14, , 30F
09/16 01:14, 30F
→
09/16 01:14, , 31F
09/16 01:14, 31F
推
09/16 01:32, , 32F
09/16 01:32, 32F
噓
09/16 01:47, , 33F
09/16 01:47, 33F
→
09/16 01:47, , 34F
09/16 01:47, 34F
噓
09/16 01:53, , 35F
09/16 01:53, 35F
推
09/16 01:56, , 36F
09/16 01:56, 36F
→
09/16 01:56, , 37F
09/16 01:56, 37F
→
09/16 01:56, , 38F
09/16 01:56, 38F
→
09/16 01:56, , 39F
09/16 01:56, 39F
→
09/16 01:56, , 40F
09/16 01:56, 40F
→
09/16 01:57, , 41F
09/16 01:57, 41F
推
09/16 02:12, , 42F
09/16 02:12, 42F
→
09/16 02:13, , 43F
09/16 02:13, 43F
→
09/16 02:21, , 44F
09/16 02:21, 44F
推
09/16 02:51, , 45F
09/16 02:51, 45F
推
09/16 03:32, , 46F
09/16 03:32, 46F
推
09/16 04:23, , 47F
09/16 04:23, 47F
噓
09/16 05:03, , 48F
09/16 05:03, 48F
噓
09/16 05:13, , 49F
09/16 05:13, 49F
→
09/16 05:49, , 50F
09/16 05:49, 50F
→
09/16 05:50, , 51F
09/16 05:50, 51F
推
09/16 07:39, , 52F
09/16 07:39, 52F
推
09/16 11:10, , 53F
09/16 11:10, 53F
推
09/16 11:31, , 54F
09/16 11:31, 54F
推
09/17 02:25, , 55F
09/17 02:25, 55F
推
09/18 02:34, , 56F
09/18 02:34, 56F
→
09/18 02:34, , 57F
09/18 02:34, 57F
討論串 (同標題文章)