[新聞] 《天啟》被評系列作最低分?原來是因為..
新聞網址:http://movies.ettoday.net/news/705168
《X戰警:天啟》被評系列作最低分?原來是因為這樣!
記者華少甫/台北報導
電影《X戰警:天啟》(X-Men: Apocalypse)搶先全美上映以來,引發許多好評,全台
票房光5天就突破1億2500萬,不過,這部經典電影,卻被電影知名網站《爛番茄》(
Rotten Tomatoes)評為《X戰警》系列作裡最難看的一部!?
根據外國媒體《CINEMABLEND》報導,《爛番茄》把《X戰警》的系列電影列出一份清單,
其中,《X戰警:天啟》的評分卻僅僅只有52%,是所有電影裡最低的,甚至比原本的《
X戰警:最後戰役》(X-Men: The Last Stand)的最低分58%還來得更低,消息一出,
引發許多網友討論。
不過,《CINEMABLEND》記者也替這種說法緩頰,認為《天啟》不應該只有這麼低的分數
,「雖然電影可能不會比《未來昔日》跟《X戰警2》來得好看,但也一定比《X戰警:最
後戰役》更精彩。這種情況的唯一可能性,就是大家對《X戰警:天啟》的期待太高了!
所以當大家期待落空時,批評也會隨之而來。」認為電影還是有很多可看性,電影將於
27日在美國上映,全台現正熱映中。
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
參考外電:Cinema Blend
Wait, X-Men: Apocalypse Is The Worst Rated X-Men Film In The Line Up?
https://t.co/CeZh8VpuJZ
補充:有點讓人感到遺憾的是:《天啟》在爛番茄的媒體綜合好評度
已經在今天跌破五成到48%了..
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.250.58.17
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/movie/M.1464407204.A.D36.html
推
05/28 11:48, , 1F
05/28 11:48, 1F
推
05/28 11:49, , 2F
05/28 11:49, 2F
推
05/28 11:49, , 3F
05/28 11:49, 3F
推
05/28 11:51, , 4F
05/28 11:51, 4F
→
05/28 11:52, , 5F
05/28 11:52, 5F
→
05/28 11:52, , 6F
05/28 11:52, 6F
噓
05/28 11:53, , 7F
05/28 11:53, 7F
推
05/28 11:54, , 8F
05/28 11:54, 8F
→
05/28 11:54, , 9F
05/28 11:54, 9F
推
05/28 11:59, , 10F
05/28 11:59, 10F
推
05/28 11:59, , 11F
05/28 11:59, 11F
→
05/28 12:01, , 12F
05/28 12:01, 12F
→
05/28 12:03, , 13F
05/28 12:03, 13F
推
05/28 12:05, , 14F
05/28 12:05, 14F
→
05/28 12:06, , 15F
05/28 12:06, 15F
推
05/28 12:14, , 16F
05/28 12:14, 16F
推
05/28 12:17, , 17F
05/28 12:17, 17F
→
05/28 12:18, , 18F
05/28 12:18, 18F
→
05/28 12:31, , 19F
05/28 12:31, 19F
推
05/28 12:33, , 20F
05/28 12:33, 20F
推
05/28 12:33, , 21F
05/28 12:33, 21F
推
05/28 12:50, , 22F
05/28 12:50, 22F
推
05/28 12:56, , 23F
05/28 12:56, 23F
推
05/28 12:58, , 24F
05/28 12:58, 24F
噓
05/28 12:59, , 25F
05/28 12:59, 25F
推
05/28 13:00, , 26F
05/28 13:00, 26F
→
05/28 13:06, , 27F
05/28 13:06, 27F
→
05/28 13:10, , 28F
05/28 13:10, 28F
→
05/28 13:43, , 29F
05/28 13:43, 29F
→
05/28 13:44, , 30F
05/28 13:44, 30F
推
05/28 13:46, , 31F
05/28 13:46, 31F
推
05/28 13:55, , 32F
05/28 13:55, 32F
→
05/28 13:56, , 33F
05/28 13:56, 33F
→
05/28 13:58, , 34F
05/28 13:58, 34F
推
05/28 14:00, , 35F
05/28 14:00, 35F
推
05/28 14:01, , 36F
05/28 14:01, 36F
→
05/28 14:05, , 37F
05/28 14:05, 37F
推
05/28 14:10, , 38F
05/28 14:10, 38F
→
05/28 14:11, , 39F
05/28 14:11, 39F
還有 25 則推文
→
05/28 16:56, , 65F
05/28 16:56, 65F
→
05/28 16:59, , 66F
05/28 16:59, 66F
→
05/28 17:01, , 67F
05/28 17:01, 67F
→
05/28 17:34, , 68F
05/28 17:34, 68F
推
05/28 18:59, , 69F
05/28 18:59, 69F
→
05/28 18:59, , 70F
05/28 18:59, 70F
→
05/28 18:59, , 71F
05/28 18:59, 71F
推
05/28 19:08, , 72F
05/28 19:08, 72F
→
05/28 19:08, , 73F
05/28 19:08, 73F
推
05/28 19:37, , 74F
05/28 19:37, 74F
推
05/28 19:40, , 75F
05/28 19:40, 75F
噓
05/28 19:57, , 76F
05/28 19:57, 76F
→
05/28 20:44, , 77F
05/28 20:44, 77F
推
05/28 20:45, , 78F
05/28 20:45, 78F
推
05/28 20:49, , 79F
05/28 20:49, 79F
→
05/28 21:02, , 80F
05/28 21:02, 80F
→
05/28 21:30, , 81F
05/28 21:30, 81F
推
05/28 21:37, , 82F
05/28 21:37, 82F
推
05/28 21:43, , 83F
05/28 21:43, 83F
→
05/28 21:44, , 84F
05/28 21:44, 84F
推
05/28 22:37, , 85F
05/28 22:37, 85F
→
05/28 22:45, , 86F
05/28 22:45, 86F
→
05/28 22:45, , 87F
05/28 22:45, 87F
推
05/28 23:52, , 88F
05/28 23:52, 88F
推
05/28 23:57, , 89F
05/28 23:57, 89F
→
05/28 23:57, , 90F
05/28 23:57, 90F
→
05/29 00:40, , 91F
05/29 00:40, 91F
→
05/29 01:25, , 92F
05/29 01:25, 92F
→
05/29 01:26, , 93F
05/29 01:26, 93F
推
05/29 01:37, , 94F
05/29 01:37, 94F
推
05/29 05:46, , 95F
05/29 05:46, 95F
推
05/29 09:37, , 96F
05/29 09:37, 96F
推
05/29 13:16, , 97F
05/29 13:16, 97F
推
05/29 13:33, , 98F
05/29 13:33, 98F
推
05/29 14:24, , 99F
05/29 14:24, 99F
推
05/29 14:36, , 100F
05/29 14:36, 100F
推
05/29 14:58, , 101F
05/29 14:58, 101F
推
05/29 16:55, , 102F
05/29 16:55, 102F
噓
05/29 20:25, , 103F
05/29 20:25, 103F
推
05/30 08:19, , 104F
05/30 08:19, 104F