[討論] 戰爭機器是漫威選角的小小失誤嗎
一直以來漫威為人稱道的就是選角以及選導演的超精準眼光
細數幾個飾演過超級英雄的演員
可說是近10年來最成功英雄選角的小勞勃道尼
三個 Chris - 美國隊長 索爾 星爵 還有蟻人 Paul Rudd
漫威幾乎永遠可以找到對的人 塑造成功又讓人喜愛的角色
這些人各有特色
有第一眼就讓人愛上超有喜感 (星爵,蟻人,死侍?)
也有有血有淚貼近人性又讓人羨慕 (鋼鐵人,美國隊長)
也有靠 nice body 就殺遍四方的雷神
但是飾演羅德中校的 Don Cheadle 算是例外
喜感0 對話0 存在感可有可無 一登場就讓人出戲
合理懷疑對於角色有超高敏感度的漫威是故意讓羅德重傷後淡出復聯
畢竟這腳色人氣不高 對於劇情影響也不大
有人也跟我相同看法嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.39.166.237
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/movie/M.1463068981.A.FE0.html
→
05/13 00:04, , 1F
05/13 00:04, 1F
推
05/13 00:05, , 2F
05/13 00:05, 2F
推
05/13 00:05, , 3F
05/13 00:05, 3F
推
05/13 00:05, , 4F
05/13 00:05, 4F
→
05/13 00:05, , 5F
05/13 00:05, 5F
→
05/13 00:05, , 6F
05/13 00:05, 6F
推
05/13 00:06, , 7F
05/13 00:06, 7F
→
05/13 00:06, , 8F
05/13 00:06, 8F
推
05/13 00:07, , 9F
05/13 00:07, 9F
→
05/13 00:07, , 10F
05/13 00:07, 10F
推
05/13 00:07, , 11F
05/13 00:07, 11F
推
05/13 00:09, , 12F
05/13 00:09, 12F
推
05/13 00:10, , 13F
05/13 00:10, 13F
→
05/13 00:11, , 14F
05/13 00:11, 14F
推
05/13 00:11, , 15F
05/13 00:11, 15F
推
05/13 00:11, , 16F
05/13 00:11, 16F
→
05/13 00:11, , 17F
05/13 00:11, 17F
推
05/13 00:12, , 18F
05/13 00:12, 18F
→
05/13 00:12, , 19F
05/13 00:12, 19F
→
05/13 00:12, , 20F
05/13 00:12, 20F
→
05/13 00:12, , 21F
05/13 00:12, 21F
噓
05/13 00:13, , 22F
05/13 00:13, 22F
推
05/13 00:13, , 23F
05/13 00:13, 23F
推
05/13 00:13, , 24F
05/13 00:13, 24F
噓
05/13 00:14, , 25F
05/13 00:14, 25F
推
05/13 00:14, , 26F
05/13 00:14, 26F
推
05/13 00:15, , 27F
05/13 00:15, 27F
→
05/13 00:15, , 28F
05/13 00:15, 28F
→
05/13 00:15, , 29F
05/13 00:15, 29F
推
05/13 00:15, , 30F
05/13 00:15, 30F
推
05/13 00:15, , 31F
05/13 00:15, 31F
→
05/13 00:15, , 32F
05/13 00:15, 32F
→
05/13 00:15, , 33F
05/13 00:15, 33F
→
05/13 00:17, , 34F
05/13 00:17, 34F
推
05/13 00:17, , 35F
05/13 00:17, 35F
推
05/13 00:18, , 36F
05/13 00:18, 36F
→
05/13 00:18, , 37F
05/13 00:18, 37F
推
05/13 00:19, , 38F
05/13 00:19, 38F
推
05/13 00:20, , 39F
05/13 00:20, 39F
還有 201 則推文
推
05/13 13:59, , 241F
05/13 13:59, 241F
推
05/13 14:21, , 242F
05/13 14:21, 242F
→
05/13 14:21, , 243F
05/13 14:21, 243F
→
05/13 14:22, , 244F
05/13 14:22, 244F
→
05/13 14:22, , 245F
05/13 14:22, 245F
推
05/13 14:33, , 246F
05/13 14:33, 246F
→
05/13 14:33, , 247F
05/13 14:33, 247F
→
05/13 14:34, , 248F
05/13 14:34, 248F
推
05/13 14:42, , 249F
05/13 14:42, 249F
→
05/13 14:42, , 250F
05/13 14:42, 250F
噓
05/13 14:51, , 251F
05/13 14:51, 251F
推
05/13 14:52, , 252F
05/13 14:52, 252F
推
05/13 14:53, , 253F
05/13 14:53, 253F
推
05/13 14:54, , 254F
05/13 14:54, 254F
推
05/13 15:13, , 255F
05/13 15:13, 255F
→
05/13 15:34, , 256F
05/13 15:34, 256F
推
05/13 15:48, , 257F
05/13 15:48, 257F
→
05/13 15:48, , 258F
05/13 15:48, 258F
→
05/13 16:43, , 259F
05/13 16:43, 259F
→
05/13 16:43, , 260F
05/13 16:43, 260F
推
05/13 17:22, , 261F
05/13 17:22, 261F
推
05/13 19:36, , 262F
05/13 19:36, 262F
推
05/13 19:44, , 263F
05/13 19:44, 263F
→
05/13 19:44, , 264F
05/13 19:44, 264F
推
05/13 21:16, , 265F
05/13 21:16, 265F
推
05/13 21:28, , 266F
05/13 21:28, 266F
→
05/13 21:28, , 267F
05/13 21:28, 267F
→
05/13 21:29, , 268F
05/13 21:29, 268F
→
05/13 21:29, , 269F
05/13 21:29, 269F
推
05/13 21:31, , 270F
05/13 21:31, 270F
推
05/13 23:24, , 271F
05/13 23:24, 271F
→
05/13 23:25, , 272F
05/13 23:25, 272F
→
05/13 23:44, , 273F
05/13 23:44, 273F
推
05/14 13:35, , 274F
05/14 13:35, 274F
推
05/15 14:17, , 275F
05/15 14:17, 275F
推
05/15 14:21, , 276F
05/15 14:21, 276F
推
05/23 14:23, , 277F
05/23 14:23, 277F
→
05/23 14:24, , 278F
05/23 14:24, 278F
→
05/23 14:24, , 279F
05/23 14:24, 279F
→
05/23 14:25, , 280F
05/23 14:25, 280F