[討論] 沒有痞子的《痞子英雄》就是爛片?
我沒有看過電視版本的痞子英雄
我只看過痞子英雄電影版第一集
很多人都說沒有仔仔 就如何如何...
可是以我一個沒有看過電視劇版本的人來說,完全沒有感覺到沒有痞子角色會如何如何
第一集的劇本架構其實還不錯
一個反物質炸彈的主軸框架與反派的確立
趙又廷的吳英雄對正義的執著
黃渤帶有些許成分的搞笑與黑道小咖的善良面的角色形象
天使寶貝的花瓶串場
結尾反派的梗
大場面的爆炸、槍戰(這部分蔡導的確遠遠不如林超賢或是毒戰的杜琪峯)
這幾個元素,我覺得足以撐起整部電影的元素與基本架構
對我沒看過電視劇的觀眾而言,這已經達成觀看的吸引力了
「電視劇有電視劇的語言、架構與節奏,電影有電影的語言、架構與節奏」
沒有痞子角色有這麼重要嗎?
其實不然
一點意見,僅供參考 XD
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 60.199.29.167
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/movie/M.1410485488.A.56A.html
推
09/12 09:33, , 1F
09/12 09:33, 1F
→
09/12 09:33, , 2F
09/12 09:33, 2F
→
09/12 09:34, , 3F
09/12 09:34, 3F
噓
09/12 09:39, , 4F
09/12 09:39, 4F
推
09/12 09:39, , 5F
09/12 09:39, 5F
→
09/12 09:39, , 6F
09/12 09:39, 6F
推
09/12 09:43, , 7F
09/12 09:43, 7F
噓
09/12 09:43, , 8F
09/12 09:43, 8F
→
09/12 09:44, , 9F
09/12 09:44, 9F
→
09/12 09:45, , 10F
09/12 09:45, 10F
→
09/12 09:45, , 11F
09/12 09:45, 11F
→
09/12 10:03, , 12F
09/12 10:03, 12F
噓
09/12 10:14, , 13F
09/12 10:14, 13F
→
09/12 10:29, , 14F
09/12 10:29, 14F
推
09/12 10:35, , 15F
09/12 10:35, 15F
噓
09/12 10:40, , 16F
09/12 10:40, 16F
噓
09/12 10:57, , 17F
09/12 10:57, 17F
推
09/12 11:00, , 18F
09/12 11:00, 18F
→
09/12 11:00, , 19F
09/12 11:00, 19F
噓
09/12 11:02, , 20F
09/12 11:02, 20F
推
09/12 11:13, , 21F
09/12 11:13, 21F
推
09/12 11:15, , 22F
09/12 11:15, 22F
推
09/12 11:27, , 23F
09/12 11:27, 23F
→
09/12 11:33, , 24F
09/12 11:33, 24F
噓
09/12 11:39, , 25F
09/12 11:39, 25F
噓
09/12 11:46, , 26F
09/12 11:46, 26F
→
09/12 11:47, , 27F
09/12 11:47, 27F
推
09/12 11:59, , 28F
09/12 11:59, 28F
推
09/12 12:00, , 29F
09/12 12:00, 29F
噓
09/12 12:03, , 30F
09/12 12:03, 30F
推
09/12 12:05, , 31F
09/12 12:05, 31F
→
09/12 12:06, , 32F
09/12 12:06, 32F
→
09/12 12:07, , 33F
09/12 12:07, 33F
噓
09/12 12:24, , 34F
09/12 12:24, 34F
噓
09/12 12:31, , 35F
09/12 12:31, 35F
→
09/12 13:09, , 36F
09/12 13:09, 36F
噓
09/12 13:26, , 37F
09/12 13:26, 37F
噓
09/12 13:27, , 38F
09/12 13:27, 38F
→
09/12 13:32, , 39F
09/12 13:32, 39F
推
09/12 13:43, , 40F
09/12 13:43, 40F
噓
09/12 13:48, , 41F
09/12 13:48, 41F
→
09/12 14:14, , 42F
09/12 14:14, 42F
噓
09/12 14:20, , 43F
09/12 14:20, 43F
噓
09/12 14:38, , 44F
09/12 14:38, 44F
推
09/12 14:59, , 45F
09/12 14:59, 45F
噓
09/12 15:33, , 46F
09/12 15:33, 46F
→
09/12 15:35, , 47F
09/12 15:35, 47F
推
09/12 16:36, , 48F
09/12 16:36, 48F
噓
09/12 18:56, , 49F
09/12 18:56, 49F
噓
09/13 00:54, , 50F
09/13 00:54, 50F
→
09/13 03:23, , 51F
09/13 03:23, 51F
噓
09/13 07:42, , 52F
09/13 07:42, 52F
推
09/13 09:10, , 53F
09/13 09:10, 53F
噓
09/13 10:46, , 54F
09/13 10:46, 54F
→
09/13 14:19, , 55F
09/13 14:19, 55F
噓
09/13 21:28, , 56F
09/13 21:28, 56F
推
09/13 22:13, , 57F
09/13 22:13, 57F
→
09/15 17:06, , 58F
09/15 17:06, 58F
→
09/15 17:08, , 59F
09/15 17:08, 59F
推
09/18 14:52, , 60F
09/18 14:52, 60F
→
09/18 14:52, , 61F
09/18 14:52, 61F
→
09/18 14:52, , 62F
09/18 14:52, 62F
→
09/18 14:52, , 63F
09/18 14:52, 63F
噓
09/20 11:16, , 64F
09/20 11:16, 64F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):