Re: [閒聊] 請問大家怎麼解決小孩的問題
藉這個標題好奇的問一下
很多媳婦都說帶孩子比賺錢辛苦
那依照這個邏輯
帶全天的保母費
應該可以年薪百萬
帶白天的保母費
月薪也要有個5萬
但實際上保母費卻沒那麼高
依照邏輯和常理
比較辛苦困難的的應該薪水比較高吧?
但實際 實務上
卻不是如此
是我想法錯了嗎?
我也想出一些可能性
媽媽要求比較高 孩子要帶得10全10美
所以如果按照媽媽吹毛求疵的帶法
薪水會超過台GG 勝過聯發科
所以
小孩是金孫 寶貝兒
不能讓保母帶 一定要超優秀的拔拔帶
如同念書要念貴族學校一樣
重點是
拔拔 一定要接受麻麻的觀念
不然就是不好的丈夫 不好的拔拔
當然一定還有媳婦不接受用價值比較辛苦度
又受不了帶小孩的辛苦
那何不交給專業(保母)的來處理
自己出去工作
一起付保母費?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.39.161.5
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/marriage/M.1431111075.A.17F.html
→
05/09 02:55, , 1F
05/09 02:55, 1F
→
05/09 02:56, , 2F
05/09 02:56, 2F
→
05/09 02:56, , 3F
05/09 02:56, 3F
※ 編輯: tarryx (114.39.161.5), 05/09/2015 03:02:55
→
05/09 03:10, , 4F
05/09 03:10, 4F
→
05/09 03:11, , 5F
05/09 03:11, 5F
→
05/09 03:12, , 6F
05/09 03:12, 6F
推
05/09 03:13, , 7F
05/09 03:13, 7F
推
05/09 03:15, , 8F
05/09 03:15, 8F
推
05/09 03:17, , 9F
05/09 03:17, 9F
推
05/09 03:17, , 10F
05/09 03:17, 10F
→
05/09 03:17, , 11F
05/09 03:17, 11F
→
05/09 03:18, , 12F
05/09 03:18, 12F
→
05/09 03:19, , 13F
05/09 03:19, 13F
→
05/09 03:20, , 14F
05/09 03:20, 14F
→
05/09 03:21, , 15F
05/09 03:21, 15F
→
05/09 03:21, , 16F
05/09 03:21, 16F
→
05/09 03:22, , 17F
05/09 03:22, 17F
→
05/09 03:22, , 18F
05/09 03:22, 18F
→
05/09 03:22, , 19F
05/09 03:22, 19F
→
05/09 03:23, , 20F
05/09 03:23, 20F
推
05/09 03:24, , 21F
05/09 03:24, 21F
推
05/09 03:25, , 22F
05/09 03:25, 22F
→
05/09 03:25, , 23F
05/09 03:25, 23F
→
05/09 03:26, , 24F
05/09 03:26, 24F
推
05/09 03:28, , 25F
05/09 03:28, 25F
→
05/09 03:29, , 26F
05/09 03:29, 26F
→
05/09 03:30, , 27F
05/09 03:30, 27F
→
05/09 03:31, , 28F
05/09 03:31, 28F
→
05/09 03:33, , 29F
05/09 03:33, 29F
推
05/09 03:33, , 30F
05/09 03:33, 30F
→
05/09 03:34, , 31F
05/09 03:34, 31F
→
05/09 03:34, , 32F
05/09 03:34, 32F
推
05/09 03:36, , 33F
05/09 03:36, 33F
→
05/09 03:36, , 34F
05/09 03:36, 34F
→
05/09 03:37, , 35F
05/09 03:37, 35F
→
05/09 03:38, , 36F
05/09 03:38, 36F
推
05/09 03:39, , 37F
05/09 03:39, 37F
→
05/09 03:39, , 38F
05/09 03:39, 38F
還有 30 則推文
→
05/09 10:44, , 69F
05/09 10:44, 69F
→
05/09 10:45, , 70F
05/09 10:45, 70F
→
05/09 10:47, , 71F
05/09 10:47, 71F
→
05/09 10:47, , 72F
05/09 10:47, 72F
推
05/09 12:06, , 73F
05/09 12:06, 73F
→
05/09 12:06, , 74F
05/09 12:06, 74F
推
05/09 12:13, , 75F
05/09 12:13, 75F
推
05/09 12:20, , 76F
05/09 12:20, 76F
推
05/09 12:22, , 77F
05/09 12:22, 77F
→
05/09 12:22, , 78F
05/09 12:22, 78F
→
05/09 12:23, , 79F
05/09 12:23, 79F
推
05/09 12:26, , 80F
05/09 12:26, 80F
推
05/09 12:28, , 81F
05/09 12:28, 81F
推
05/09 12:39, , 82F
05/09 12:39, 82F
→
05/09 12:40, , 83F
05/09 12:40, 83F
→
05/09 12:41, , 84F
05/09 12:41, 84F
→
05/09 12:42, , 85F
05/09 12:42, 85F
→
05/09 14:41, , 86F
05/09 14:41, 86F
→
05/09 14:41, , 87F
05/09 14:41, 87F
→
05/09 14:41, , 88F
05/09 14:41, 88F
→
05/09 14:41, , 89F
05/09 14:41, 89F
→
05/09 14:41, , 90F
05/09 14:41, 90F
噓
05/09 15:11, , 91F
05/09 15:11, 91F
推
05/09 19:28, , 92F
05/09 19:28, 92F
→
05/09 19:28, , 93F
05/09 19:28, 93F
→
05/09 19:28, , 94F
05/09 19:28, 94F
推
05/09 20:10, , 95F
05/09 20:10, 95F
→
05/09 20:11, , 96F
05/09 20:11, 96F
→
05/09 20:11, , 97F
05/09 20:11, 97F
→
05/09 20:12, , 98F
05/09 20:12, 98F
→
05/09 20:13, , 99F
05/09 20:13, 99F
→
05/09 20:13, , 100F
05/09 20:13, 100F
→
05/09 20:14, , 101F
05/09 20:14, 101F
→
05/09 20:14, , 102F
05/09 20:14, 102F
→
05/09 22:42, , 103F
05/09 22:42, 103F
→
05/10 00:44, , 104F
05/10 00:44, 104F
→
05/10 00:45, , 105F
05/10 00:45, 105F
→
05/10 04:45, , 106F
05/10 04:45, 106F
→
05/10 04:46, , 107F
05/10 04:46, 107F
推
05/10 15:46, , 108F
05/10 15:46, 108F
討論串 (同標題文章)