Fw: [問卦] 如果一個師都是甲甲的話 戰力大概有多強?消失
※ [本文轉錄自 Gossiping 看板 #1RbvBJpg ]
作者: RandyMarsh (同志友善の屎蛋爸) 看板: Gossiping
標題: Re: [問卦] 如果一個師都是甲甲的話 戰力大概有多強?
時間: Tue Sep 11 18:02:56 2018
※ 引述 《dan5209》 之銘言:
: 標題: [問卦] 如果一個師都是甲甲的話 戰力大概有多強?
: 時間: Tue Sep 11 17:48:00 2018
:
: 肥宅我個人是性別平等中立的.
:
: 社會上各行各業多少都會有甲甲,
:
: 不管是醫師,老師,檢警,工程師,公務員,董事長,等等
:
: 或是基層技術員,工人,服務業,等等的
:
: 不分職業高低,
:
: 甲甲之間有困難,都會彼此互助合作幫忙.
:
: 肥宅我個人好奇,
:
: 如果今天一整個師都是甲甲的話,
:
: 師對抗的時候 兵棋推演 ,戰力大概有多強??
:
第一年,大家感情都很好
第十年,大家免疫力都不好
我的看法啦
大概4這樣
--
行政院衛生署疾病管制局101年度科技研究發展計畫 執行機構:國立成功大學醫學院
發展「網路約會(炮)文化」之網路意見領袖介入策略及成效評估 http://goo.gl/ieKlxl
背景:男同性性行為(men sex with men, MSM)是台灣HIV感染首要的危險因素,網路的
隱密性、方便性及快速連結社群的特質成為男同志社群社交及尋求性伴侶的新興媒介,亦
成為MSM傳播及感染性病及HIV的危險環境。本研究為描述男同志網路社群之「網路約會(
炮)文化」
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.140.18.1
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1536660179.A.CEA.html
→
09/11 18:03, , 1F
09/11 18:03, 1F
推
09/11 18:03, , 2F
09/11 18:03, 2F
推
09/11 18:03, , 3F
09/11 18:03, 3F
推
09/11 18:04, , 4F
09/11 18:04, 4F
推
09/11 18:04, , 5F
09/11 18:04, 5F
推
09/11 18:04, , 6F
09/11 18:04, 6F
推
09/11 18:04, , 7F
09/11 18:04, 7F
→
09/11 18:04, , 8F
09/11 18:04, 8F
→
09/11 18:04, , 9F
09/11 18:04, 9F
推
09/11 18:04, , 10F
09/11 18:04, 10F
→
09/11 18:04, , 11F
09/11 18:04, 11F
推
09/11 18:05, , 12F
09/11 18:05, 12F
推
09/11 18:05, , 13F
09/11 18:05, 13F
推
09/11 18:05, , 14F
09/11 18:05, 14F
推
09/11 18:05, , 15F
09/11 18:05, 15F
推
09/11 18:05, , 16F
09/11 18:05, 16F
→
09/11 18:05, , 17F
09/11 18:05, 17F
推
09/11 18:06, , 18F
09/11 18:06, 18F
推
09/11 18:06, , 19F
09/11 18:06, 19F
→
09/11 18:06, , 20F
09/11 18:06, 20F
推
09/11 18:06, , 21F
09/11 18:06, 21F
推
09/11 18:06, , 22F
09/11 18:06, 22F
推
09/11 18:06, , 23F
09/11 18:06, 23F
推
09/11 18:07, , 24F
09/11 18:07, 24F
推
09/11 18:07, , 25F
09/11 18:07, 25F
推
09/11 18:07, , 26F
09/11 18:07, 26F
→
09/11 18:07, , 27F
09/11 18:07, 27F
推
09/11 18:07, , 28F
09/11 18:07, 28F
→
09/11 18:08, , 29F
09/11 18:08, 29F
推
09/11 18:08, , 30F
09/11 18:08, 30F
推
09/11 18:08, , 31F
09/11 18:08, 31F
推
09/11 18:08, , 32F
09/11 18:08, 32F
→
09/11 18:09, , 33F
09/11 18:09, 33F
推
09/11 18:09, , 34F
09/11 18:09, 34F
推
09/11 18:09, , 35F
09/11 18:09, 35F
推
09/11 18:09, , 36F
09/11 18:09, 36F
推
09/11 18:10, , 37F
09/11 18:10, 37F
推
09/11 18:10, , 38F
09/11 18:10, 38F
推
09/11 18:10, , 39F
09/11 18:10, 39F
還有 418 則推文
還有 1 段內文
推
09/12 20:53, , 458F
09/12 20:53, 458F
→
09/12 20:54, , 459F
09/12 20:54, 459F
→
09/12 20:54, , 460F
09/12 20:54, 460F
推
09/12 20:56, , 461F
09/12 20:56, 461F
推
09/12 20:59, , 462F
09/12 20:59, 462F
→
09/12 20:59, , 463F
09/12 20:59, 463F
推
09/12 21:00, , 464F
09/12 21:00, 464F
推
09/12 21:05, , 465F
09/12 21:05, 465F
推
09/12 21:07, , 466F
09/12 21:07, 466F
推
09/12 21:11, , 467F
09/12 21:11, 467F
→
09/12 21:11, , 468F
09/12 21:11, 468F
→
09/12 21:11, , 469F
09/12 21:11, 469F
推
09/12 21:15, , 470F
09/12 21:15, 470F
噓
09/12 21:38, , 471F
09/12 21:38, 471F
→
09/12 21:53, , 472F
09/12 21:53, 472F
推
09/12 21:57, , 473F
09/12 21:57, 473F
噓
09/12 21:59, , 474F
09/12 21:59, 474F
推
09/12 22:02, , 475F
09/12 22:02, 475F
推
09/12 22:13, , 476F
09/12 22:13, 476F
推
09/12 22:14, , 477F
09/12 22:14, 477F
→
09/12 22:14, , 478F
09/12 22:14, 478F
推
09/12 22:21, , 479F
09/12 22:21, 479F
推
09/12 22:29, , 480F
09/12 22:29, 480F
推
09/12 22:29, , 481F
09/12 22:29, 481F
推
09/12 22:56, , 482F
09/12 22:56, 482F
推
09/12 23:19, , 483F
09/12 23:19, 483F
推
09/12 23:27, , 484F
09/12 23:27, 484F
推
09/12 23:27, , 485F
09/12 23:27, 485F
推
09/13 00:18, , 486F
09/13 00:18, 486F
推
09/13 00:19, , 487F
09/13 00:19, 487F
→
09/13 00:19, , 488F
09/13 00:19, 488F
→
09/13 00:21, , 489F
09/13 00:21, 489F
推
09/13 00:35, , 490F
09/13 00:35, 490F
噓
09/13 00:42, , 491F
09/13 00:42, 491F
推
09/13 00:53, , 492F
09/13 00:53, 492F
推
09/13 00:59, , 493F
09/13 00:59, 493F
推
09/13 01:30, , 494F
09/13 01:30, 494F
推
09/13 01:51, , 495F
09/13 01:51, 495F
推
09/13 02:57, , 496F
09/13 02:57, 496F
推
09/13 03:23, , 497F
09/13 03:23, 497F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):