Re: [心得] 看到iphone 6與6+的感想
※ 引述《sincsnow (sincsnow)》之銘言:
: 今天走進台哥大的門市去看了一下iphone6與6+的展示機了,也用手摸了一下
: 心裡的感想是,iphone的美感不見了。
: 小弟這樣子說純粹是個人的感想,各位看到了請不要見怪。
: 首先,iphone 6+的整體摸起來,好像是塑膠機啊。失去了傳統的金屬光澤與質感。
: 讓我忍不住的去比了一下旁邊htc的m8。m8好像都做得比iphone 6+好。
: 其次,iphone 6與ios8的icon的畫面,看起來好擠啊。連排列的美感都不見了。
: ios 7與8的icon我個人是很不喜歡的。但到了iphone 6,連排列也排得怪怪的。唉
: iphone6與6+摸起來似乎也很脆弱,一旦撞擊的話,好像會發生不測。
: 原本的4s就很耐撞。但iphone6與6+的話,似乎不能保證什麼了。
: 雖然大的iphone 6+看網頁的確是字大了一些,但整體上來說,我個人的感覺
: iphone 6與6+的工藝水平好像沒有達到我個人對iphone的傳統期待。看著我手上的
: 4s,還是覺得有一種奇妙的美學與質感在。我個人對iphone 6與6+感到可惜了。
: 希望iphone 7不要又讓我失望了。嘆。
先前期待iphone6與6 plus,看完只有不斷的搖頭搖頭再搖頭,
6的外型最大的予盾點,就是用了金屬色,但確沒有金屬感,只有濃濃的塑膠感,
6的土豪金與5s的土豪金實在是天壤之別,整體外型質感遠輸於5s太多,
拿在手上時,我甚至懷疑這是iphone嗎?真的要選顏色的話,只有銀色,勉強還算協調。
6的相機鏡頭或許有其考量,但不諱言的,鏡頭設計確實是凸了一塊出來。
6 plus的外觀尺寸若下方要做指紋辯識也就算了,其他部份確是非窄邊,
當時店家放了他牌營幕大小差不多的展示機,外型互相比較,但6plus整體確大隻很多。
隨著6出來,5s降價,以cp值與質感來說,或許5s才是比較正確的選擇!?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 163.27.236.117
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/iPhone/M.1411973433.A.251.html
→
09/29 14:52, , 1F
09/29 14:52, 1F
→
09/29 14:53, , 2F
09/29 14:53, 2F
推
09/29 14:54, , 3F
09/29 14:54, 3F
→
09/29 14:55, , 4F
09/29 14:55, 4F
推
09/29 14:55, , 5F
09/29 14:55, 5F
→
09/29 14:55, , 6F
09/29 14:55, 6F
推
09/29 14:57, , 7F
09/29 14:57, 7F
→
09/29 14:57, , 8F
09/29 14:57, 8F
→
09/29 14:57, , 9F
09/29 14:57, 9F
推
09/29 14:59, , 10F
09/29 14:59, 10F
→
09/29 14:59, , 11F
09/29 14:59, 11F
→
09/29 15:01, , 12F
09/29 15:01, 12F
推
09/29 15:01, , 13F
09/29 15:01, 13F
→
09/29 15:01, , 14F
09/29 15:01, 14F
→
09/29 15:01, , 15F
09/29 15:01, 15F
推
09/29 15:05, , 16F
09/29 15:05, 16F
→
09/29 15:06, , 17F
09/29 15:06, 17F
→
09/29 15:06, , 18F
09/29 15:06, 18F
→
09/29 15:06, , 19F
09/29 15:06, 19F
推
09/29 15:08, , 20F
09/29 15:08, 20F
推
09/29 15:16, , 21F
09/29 15:16, 21F
→
09/29 15:16, , 22F
09/29 15:16, 22F
→
09/29 15:16, , 23F
09/29 15:16, 23F
→
09/29 15:21, , 24F
09/29 15:21, 24F
→
09/29 15:25, , 25F
09/29 15:25, 25F
推
09/29 15:25, , 26F
09/29 15:25, 26F
→
09/29 15:27, , 27F
09/29 15:27, 27F
推
09/29 15:30, , 28F
09/29 15:30, 28F
→
09/29 15:32, , 29F
09/29 15:32, 29F
推
09/29 15:38, , 30F
09/29 15:38, 30F
推
09/29 15:39, , 31F
09/29 15:39, 31F
推
09/29 15:40, , 32F
09/29 15:40, 32F
推
09/29 15:44, , 33F
09/29 15:44, 33F
推
09/29 15:44, , 34F
09/29 15:44, 34F
推
09/29 15:46, , 35F
09/29 15:46, 35F
推
09/29 15:46, , 36F
09/29 15:46, 36F
→
09/29 15:46, , 37F
09/29 15:46, 37F
→
09/29 15:46, , 38F
09/29 15:46, 38F
→
09/29 15:48, , 39F
09/29 15:48, 39F
還有 31 則推文
推
09/29 16:37, , 71F
09/29 16:37, 71F
推
09/29 16:41, , 72F
09/29 16:41, 72F
→
09/29 16:41, , 73F
09/29 16:41, 73F
→
09/29 16:41, , 74F
09/29 16:41, 74F
→
09/29 16:42, , 75F
09/29 16:42, 75F
→
09/29 16:50, , 76F
09/29 16:50, 76F
推
09/29 16:59, , 77F
09/29 16:59, 77F
→
09/29 16:59, , 78F
09/29 16:59, 78F
推
09/29 17:00, , 79F
09/29 17:00, 79F
推
09/29 17:00, , 80F
09/29 17:00, 80F
推
09/29 17:01, , 81F
09/29 17:01, 81F
推
09/29 17:14, , 82F
09/29 17:14, 82F
推
09/29 17:14, , 83F
09/29 17:14, 83F
→
09/29 17:15, , 84F
09/29 17:15, 84F
推
09/29 17:17, , 85F
09/29 17:17, 85F
推
09/29 17:24, , 86F
09/29 17:24, 86F
推
09/29 17:31, , 87F
09/29 17:31, 87F
→
09/29 17:39, , 88F
09/29 17:39, 88F
推
09/29 17:42, , 89F
09/29 17:42, 89F
推
09/29 17:44, , 90F
09/29 17:44, 90F
推
09/29 17:52, , 91F
09/29 17:52, 91F
推
09/29 18:11, , 92F
09/29 18:11, 92F
推
09/29 18:15, , 93F
09/29 18:15, 93F
噓
09/29 18:56, , 94F
09/29 18:56, 94F
推
09/29 19:15, , 95F
09/29 19:15, 95F
→
09/29 19:16, , 96F
09/29 19:16, 96F
→
09/29 19:17, , 97F
09/29 19:17, 97F
→
09/29 19:17, , 98F
09/29 19:17, 98F
→
09/29 19:48, , 99F
09/29 19:48, 99F
推
09/29 20:38, , 100F
09/29 20:38, 100F
→
09/29 20:38, , 101F
09/29 20:38, 101F
推
09/29 22:35, , 102F
09/29 22:35, 102F
→
09/29 22:35, , 103F
09/29 22:35, 103F
推
09/29 22:56, , 104F
09/29 22:56, 104F
→
09/29 22:57, , 105F
09/29 22:57, 105F
→
09/29 22:58, , 106F
09/29 22:58, 106F
→
09/29 23:00, , 107F
09/29 23:00, 107F
→
09/30 00:23, , 108F
09/30 00:23, 108F
→
09/30 00:23, , 109F
09/30 00:23, 109F
推
09/30 01:17, , 110F
09/30 01:17, 110F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 14 之 23 篇):