[新聞] 買賣附健檢 王應傑:宣布中古屋得癌症判死刑
內文:
買賣附健檢 王應傑:宣布中古屋得癌症判死刑
內政部次長花敬群今(21)日上午表示,內政部正研擬修法推動30年以上老屋強制健檢
,未來老屋買賣之前,需附健檢証明,讓買方了解房子是否安全,預計立法院本會期就
會提出修法。台北市商業會理事長、東森房屋董事長王應傑回應:如果真的修法實施,
那麼誰來負責健檢?誰來負擔費用?接下來勢必「等於宣布中古屋得癌症、判決死刑!
」
王應傑表示,花敬群研議30年以上老屋強制健檢,未來老屋買賣需附健檢証明,這件事
情,是茲事體大!
王應傑表示,老屋健檢,雖讓房子比較有保障,但是,老屋健檢有沒有法律依據?健檢
的費用由誰來負擔?是政府來付?還是民眾?如果民眾自己負擔,那麼沒有良好配套措
施,那肯定造成民怨,舉國嘩然,未來也可能反映在持有成本上,影響價格與交易量。
王應傑說,這項措施,勢必造成增加仲介市場的負擔,未來屋齡30年以上老屋的委售案
件勢必大減,「等於是宣布中古屋得癌症、判死刑!」將影響其交易量縮減、房價下跌
,建議政府得再邀產官學長期研議,勿貿然上路。
王應傑表示,相信花次長這項措施的用意,是想加速舊屋汰換,加速推動都市更新。可
是第一刻不容緩的要務是都市更新,尤其位於土壤高度潛勢區、或40年屋齡以上沒有地
下室的高齡老屋,才最迫切需要推動優先都更,而並不是先推動老屋健檢,列為第一優
先,這樣才更「擾民」。政府官員不能想到什麼,就做什麼,應該要有完整配套,再開
始推動。
連結:
http://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20160921005817-260410
其他:心得必須在這 並超過二十字 否則視為無效新聞
最近政府一連串出招,感覺愈來愈用力,
先是房地合一稅,
接著是雨遮不計坪,
現在是中古屋要健檢證明才能賣,
以前隨便找個中古屋,作個拉皮工程就可以輕鬆賺的日子看來要一去不返了。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 59.123.171.56
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/home-sale/M.1474459701.A.979.html
推
09/21 20:23, , 1F
09/21 20:23, 1F
推
09/21 20:26, , 2F
09/21 20:26, 2F
推
09/21 20:31, , 3F
09/21 20:31, 3F
推
09/21 20:40, , 4F
09/21 20:40, 4F
推
09/21 20:42, , 5F
09/21 20:42, 5F
推
09/21 20:44, , 6F
09/21 20:44, 6F
推
09/21 20:46, , 7F
09/21 20:46, 7F
推
09/21 20:46, , 8F
09/21 20:46, 8F
推
09/21 20:48, , 9F
09/21 20:48, 9F
→
09/21 20:49, , 10F
09/21 20:49, 10F
推
09/21 20:56, , 11F
09/21 20:56, 11F
→
09/21 20:59, , 12F
09/21 20:59, 12F
推
09/21 21:12, , 13F
09/21 21:12, 13F
推
09/21 21:15, , 14F
09/21 21:15, 14F
→
09/21 21:16, , 15F
09/21 21:16, 15F
推
09/21 21:28, , 16F
09/21 21:28, 16F
推
09/21 21:32, , 17F
09/21 21:32, 17F
推
09/21 21:34, , 18F
09/21 21:34, 18F
推
09/21 21:37, , 19F
09/21 21:37, 19F
推
09/21 21:42, , 20F
09/21 21:42, 20F
推
09/21 21:44, , 21F
09/21 21:44, 21F
→
09/21 21:45, , 22F
09/21 21:45, 22F
推
09/21 21:46, , 23F
09/21 21:46, 23F
推
09/21 21:47, , 24F
09/21 21:47, 24F
→
09/21 21:47, , 25F
09/21 21:47, 25F
→
09/21 21:48, , 26F
09/21 21:48, 26F
推
09/21 21:52, , 27F
09/21 21:52, 27F
→
09/21 21:52, , 28F
09/21 21:52, 28F
推
09/21 21:55, , 29F
09/21 21:55, 29F
→
09/21 21:55, , 30F
09/21 21:55, 30F
推
09/21 22:00, , 31F
09/21 22:00, 31F
→
09/21 22:01, , 32F
09/21 22:01, 32F
推
09/21 22:07, , 33F
09/21 22:07, 33F
→
09/21 22:07, , 34F
09/21 22:07, 34F
→
09/21 22:07, , 35F
09/21 22:07, 35F
→
09/21 22:10, , 36F
09/21 22:10, 36F
推
09/21 22:15, , 37F
09/21 22:15, 37F
→
09/21 22:15, , 38F
09/21 22:15, 38F
→
09/21 22:16, , 39F
09/21 22:16, 39F
還有 42 則推文
推
09/21 22:49, , 82F
09/21 22:49, 82F
→
09/21 22:50, , 83F
09/21 22:50, 83F
→
09/21 22:51, , 84F
09/21 22:51, 84F
推
09/21 22:53, , 85F
09/21 22:53, 85F
推
09/21 22:56, , 86F
09/21 22:56, 86F
推
09/21 23:01, , 87F
09/21 23:01, 87F
→
09/21 23:01, , 88F
09/21 23:01, 88F
推
09/21 23:17, , 89F
09/21 23:17, 89F
推
09/21 23:25, , 90F
09/21 23:25, 90F
推
09/21 23:37, , 91F
09/21 23:37, 91F
→
09/21 23:37, , 92F
09/21 23:37, 92F
→
09/21 23:45, , 93F
09/21 23:45, 93F
推
09/21 23:53, , 94F
09/21 23:53, 94F
→
09/21 23:54, , 95F
09/21 23:54, 95F
推
09/22 01:24, , 96F
09/22 01:24, 96F
推
09/22 01:30, , 97F
09/22 01:30, 97F
推
09/22 01:31, , 98F
09/22 01:31, 98F
→
09/22 02:08, , 99F
09/22 02:08, 99F
→
09/22 02:09, , 100F
09/22 02:09, 100F
推
09/22 07:30, , 101F
09/22 07:30, 101F
→
09/22 07:30, , 102F
09/22 07:30, 102F
推
09/22 08:01, , 103F
09/22 08:01, 103F
推
09/22 08:14, , 104F
09/22 08:14, 104F
→
09/22 08:56, , 105F
09/22 08:56, 105F
→
09/22 10:21, , 106F
09/22 10:21, 106F
推
09/22 10:21, , 107F
09/22 10:21, 107F
→
09/22 10:22, , 108F
09/22 10:22, 108F
→
09/22 10:23, , 109F
09/22 10:23, 109F
推
09/22 12:43, , 110F
09/22 12:43, 110F
推
09/22 12:51, , 111F
09/22 12:51, 111F
推
09/22 13:43, , 112F
09/22 13:43, 112F
→
09/22 13:43, , 113F
09/22 13:43, 113F
推
09/22 13:48, , 114F
09/22 13:48, 114F
→
09/22 13:48, , 115F
09/22 13:48, 115F
→
09/22 13:55, , 116F
09/22 13:55, 116F
推
09/22 16:12, , 117F
09/22 16:12, 117F
→
09/22 16:13, , 118F
09/22 16:13, 118F
推
09/22 18:36, , 119F
09/22 18:36, 119F
→
09/22 18:36, , 120F
09/22 18:36, 120F
推
09/22 18:59, , 121F
09/22 18:59, 121F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):