[問題] 代書跟房仲不應該是水幫魚,魚幫水嗎?已回收
小弟因為allpost看到K大發的文章
進而接觸到此版,小弟身旁有房仲的球友
不外乎有新一輩地政系的同學
考取地政士及不動產經紀人資格
借問
代書和房仲不應該是互相幫忙的嗎
代書的收入來源,除了簽店的案子
不也論件計酬
還是其實這職務和房仲有什麼利害關係
應該兩者都會知悉成交價格吧
個人覺得房仲折佣也不是什麼大新聞了
房市炒作,似乎兩者也並無關聯
其實如果服務好
收取合理的報酬我想也是合情合理
如果服務無價,該職業也並無存在的必要性
二來討論的是,既然兩者應該是魚幫水,水幫魚的職業
又K大為何會如此排斥仲介(先說小弟只是路過
也買不起房子),我想K大如果站在代書的角度而言
還是第一次聽到反仲介的
正確來說,以角色扮演的立場來看
應是買方以及賣方,甚至是長期和房仲配合的投資客
才會有cost down的想法
小弟不才,也無買房市經驗
北市小鄉民,純粹好奇點在哪
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.250.115.250
推
06/14 09:30, , 1F
06/14 09:30, 1F
→
06/14 09:31, , 2F
06/14 09:31, 2F
→
06/14 09:32, , 3F
06/14 09:32, 3F
→
06/14 09:35, , 4F
06/14 09:35, 4F
→
06/14 09:36, , 5F
06/14 09:36, 5F
→
06/14 09:40, , 6F
06/14 09:40, 6F
→
06/14 09:45, , 7F
06/14 09:45, 7F
→
06/14 09:45, , 8F
06/14 09:45, 8F
→
06/14 09:47, , 9F
06/14 09:47, 9F
→
06/14 09:59, , 10F
06/14 09:59, 10F
→
06/14 10:00, , 11F
06/14 10:00, 11F
推
06/14 10:01, , 12F
06/14 10:01, 12F
→
06/14 10:01, , 13F
06/14 10:01, 13F
→
06/14 10:01, , 14F
06/14 10:01, 14F
→
06/14 10:02, , 15F
06/14 10:02, 15F
→
06/14 10:02, , 16F
06/14 10:02, 16F
→
06/14 10:04, , 17F
06/14 10:04, 17F
→
06/14 10:04, , 18F
06/14 10:04, 18F
→
06/14 10:05, , 19F
06/14 10:05, 19F
→
06/14 10:07, , 20F
06/14 10:07, 20F
→
06/14 10:07, , 21F
06/14 10:07, 21F
→
06/14 10:07, , 22F
06/14 10:07, 22F
推
06/14 10:35, , 23F
06/14 10:35, 23F
→
06/14 10:36, , 24F
06/14 10:36, 24F
→
06/14 10:36, , 25F
06/14 10:36, 25F
推
06/14 10:41, , 26F
06/14 10:41, 26F
→
06/14 10:41, , 27F
06/14 10:41, 27F
→
06/14 10:41, , 28F
06/14 10:41, 28F
推
06/14 10:48, , 29F
06/14 10:48, 29F
→
06/14 10:57, , 30F
06/14 10:57, 30F
→
06/14 10:57, , 31F
06/14 10:57, 31F
→
06/14 10:58, , 32F
06/14 10:58, 32F
推
06/14 11:11, , 33F
06/14 11:11, 33F
推
06/14 11:15, , 34F
06/14 11:15, 34F
推
06/14 11:16, , 35F
06/14 11:16, 35F
推
06/14 11:37, , 36F
06/14 11:37, 36F
推
06/14 11:38, , 37F
06/14 11:38, 37F
推
06/14 11:49, , 38F
06/14 11:49, 38F
→
06/14 11:52, , 39F
06/14 11:52, 39F
推
06/14 11:53, , 40F
06/14 11:53, 40F
推
06/14 11:57, , 41F
06/14 11:57, 41F
推
06/14 11:57, , 42F
06/14 11:57, 42F
推
06/14 12:08, , 43F
06/14 12:08, 43F
→
06/14 12:10, , 44F
06/14 12:10, 44F
→
06/14 12:17, , 45F
06/14 12:17, 45F
→
06/14 12:18, , 46F
06/14 12:18, 46F
→
06/14 12:18, , 47F
06/14 12:18, 47F
推
06/14 12:19, , 48F
06/14 12:19, 48F
→
06/14 12:20, , 49F
06/14 12:20, 49F
→
06/14 12:21, , 50F
06/14 12:21, 50F
→
06/14 12:22, , 51F
06/14 12:22, 51F
→
06/14 12:23, , 52F
06/14 12:23, 52F
→
06/14 12:39, , 53F
06/14 12:39, 53F
→
06/14 12:40, , 54F
06/14 12:40, 54F
→
06/14 12:41, , 55F
06/14 12:41, 55F
→
06/14 12:41, , 56F
06/14 12:41, 56F
→
06/14 12:42, , 57F
06/14 12:42, 57F
→
06/14 12:48, , 58F
06/14 12:48, 58F
→
06/14 12:50, , 59F
06/14 12:50, 59F
→
06/14 12:50, , 60F
06/14 12:50, 60F
→
06/14 13:10, , 61F
06/14 13:10, 61F
推
06/14 13:11, , 62F
06/14 13:11, 62F
→
06/14 13:12, , 63F
06/14 13:12, 63F
→
06/14 13:13, , 64F
06/14 13:13, 64F
推
06/14 14:07, , 65F
06/14 14:07, 65F
→
06/14 14:40, , 66F
06/14 14:40, 66F
→
06/14 15:50, , 67F
06/14 15:50, 67F
→
06/14 15:51, , 68F
06/14 15:51, 68F
→
06/14 15:54, , 69F
06/14 15:54, 69F
→
06/14 15:56, , 70F
06/14 15:56, 70F
推
06/14 17:05, , 71F
06/14 17:05, 71F
推
06/14 17:10, , 72F
06/14 17:10, 72F
推
06/14 17:12, , 73F
06/14 17:12, 73F
→
06/14 17:16, , 74F
06/14 17:16, 74F
→
06/14 17:17, , 75F
06/14 17:17, 75F
→
06/14 17:20, , 76F
06/14 17:20, 76F
→
06/14 21:14, , 77F
06/14 21:14, 77F
→
06/14 21:14, , 78F
06/14 21:14, 78F
→
06/14 21:15, , 79F
06/14 21:15, 79F
→
06/14 21:16, , 80F
06/14 21:16, 80F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):