Fw: [討論] 佔領可以擁有很多種方式

看板historia作者goenitzx時間8年前 (2015/10/31 22:02)推噓6(6推 0噓 24→)

留言30則, 14人參與討論串1/3 (看更多)

可能相關討論，提供參考 ※ [本文轉錄自 PublicIssue 看板 #1MDCN8zX ] 作者: saveme (hihi) 看板: PublicIssue 標題: [討論] 佔領可以擁有很多種方式時間: Sat Oct 31 21:44:33 2015 http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1951v07p1/pg_406 Formosa: Malik shifted the conversation to Formosa, inquiring how the United States occupation of Formosa could do other than cause the Chinese Communists to hate the United States. He Seemed to believe this is the principal reason for the Chinese Communist intervention. He was unperturbed by Cory`s mention of the fact that last fall Mr.Dulles had expressly told the UN that there were only 42 American soldiers in Formosa. Malik continued to insist that the United States occupies Formosa, adducing as additional proof the recent establishment of an American Military Advisory Group for Formosa. At the point, Tsarapkin came into the coversation to observe that there were various forms of occupation and the United States could occupy Formosa without many Americans being present. (From the tenor of the conversation, it seems possible that Tsarapkin was assuming that the United States occuppies Formosa with few Americans being present in much the same way that the USSR managed to control North Korea with relatively few Russians in the country.) 福爾摩沙: Malik轉移話題到台灣,詢問美國如何佔領台灣除了導致中國共產黨討厭美國. 他似乎相信這是中國共產黨介入主要的理由.他鎮定的由Cory提及的事實在最後的秋天杜勒斯先生明顯的告訴UN那裡只有42名美國士兵在福爾摩沙.Malik繼續堅決認為美國佔領台灣,援引額外的證據如最近在台灣的美軍顧問團.在此,Tsarapkin來到了這個話題評論那裡有多種佔領的方式且美國能不需要許多美國人在場就可以佔領台灣(從話題的大意 ,Tsarapkin認為美國只有少許美國人在場就可占領台灣在大致相同的方式於USSR相當於少數的俄羅斯人在國家裡設法控制北韓.) ______________________________________________ 佔領不一定要派很多軍人在佔領地,就可以佔領該地. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 39.13.157.103 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PublicIssue/M.1446299080.A.F61.html

推

goenitzx

10/31 21:50, , 1^F

10/31 21:50, 1^F

轉啊~ ※ 編輯: saveme (39.13.157.103), 10/31/2015 21:58:21 ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ※ 轉錄者: goenitzx (220.134.41.80), 10/31/2015 22:02:27 ※ 編輯: goenitzx (220.134.41.80), 10/31/2015 22:03:17

推

wlcaroline

10/31 22:07, , 2^F

10/31 22:07, 2^F

→

wlcaroline

10/31 22:08, , 3^F

10/31 22:08, 3^F

推

YYOO

10/31 22:14, , 4^F

10/31 22:14, 4^F