Re: [討論] 你必須要有的覺悟
簡單說越早期治療 效果越好啦
如果你在第二期有機會恢復到第一期
然後持續吃藥不會惡化到第二期以後
有醫學紀錄的十年 只有約1成多的人會惡化
剩餘八成至少是持平或是比吃藥前更好
所以不要在聽啥 吃五年後還是會變地中海
這是少數人的狀況
※ 引述《orz811017 (orz811017)》之銘言：
: 真的很擔心的人就會去看醫生了
: 版友也不是醫生，只是醫生講的話都差不多
: 最近剛剛22 之前問過幾次也是沒甚麼特別的作為
: 直到年初去長庚看完醫生開始吃藥抹藥 目前2期
: 未來打算稱到 碩士班 當兵 25.26歲
: 如果還OK就繼續吃抹 不行就植髮 大概稱到3X歲吧
: 我覺得還是早期發現早期治療
: 18歲 開始的話，大概大三大四、碩士班就可能些微明顯禿髮了
: 像我今年大四 有幾個同學已經有明顯的禿髮了
: 校園中也有不少禿髮的碩博生....(可能工科學生比較可憐QQ
: 這段時光被說禿頭，人生都快變黑白了
: 然後可能到三十歲就進展到4.5期以上
: 在適婚年齡的這個時候根本超吃虧
: 在毛囊還能苟延殘喘的情況下 就能期待未來可能還有一些新療法、新藥物
: (EX:拖很久的Replicel 今年好像進入第二期臨床了)
: 如果沒有毛囊的話，就跟張泰山一樣完全GG了~
: 那何不買個希望的種子呢XD?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 117.80.185.88
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/hair_loss/M.1413707456.A.A8B.html
→
10/19 16:36, , 1F
10/19 16:36, 1F
→
10/19 16:37, , 2F
10/19 16:37, 2F
第三期五年使用狀況
http://www.regrowth.com/remedies/propecia-phase-iii-5-year-hair-loss-results/
http://www.hairlosshelp.com/html/Propecia5yrstudy.cfm
另一個報告 也是五年的研究成果
節路一下重點
The responders were still ahead of the game with respect to the people who
were getting the placebo. If you were a good responder to Propecia, after 5
years of taking it you would still have 40 hairs more than you had when you
started out. In contrast a person who was not on Propecia lost a considerable
amount of hair, on average 220 less than they had started out with. So that
would mean that you would have 260 more hairs than you would have had if you
didn't use Propecia, i.e. 220 that did not fall out, and an additional 40 new
hairs.
推
10/19 16:40, , 3F
10/19 16:40, 3F
→
10/19 16:40, , 4F
10/19 16:40, 4F
※ 編輯: baboosh (1.34.34.44), 10/19/2014 17:06:22
※ 編輯: baboosh (1.34.34.44), 10/19/2014 17:15:50
※ 編輯: baboosh (117.80.185.88), 10/19/2014 17:18:35
→
10/19 18:17, , 5F
10/19 18:17, 5F
→
10/19 18:18, , 6F
10/19 18:18, 6F
→
10/19 18:19, , 7F
10/19 18:19, 7F
→
10/19 18:19, , 8F
10/19 18:19, 8F
→
10/19 18:19, , 9F
10/19 18:19, 9F
→
10/19 18:21, , 10F
10/19 18:21, 10F
→
10/19 18:21, , 11F
10/19 18:21, 11F
→
10/19 18:25, , 12F
10/19 18:25, 12F
→
10/19 18:25, , 13F
10/19 18:25, 13F
→
10/19 18:25, , 14F
10/19 18:25, 14F
→
10/19 18:25, , 15F
10/19 18:25, 15F
→
10/19 18:27, , 16F
10/19 18:27, 16F
→
10/19 18:27, , 17F
10/19 18:27, 17F
→
10/19 18:27, , 18F
10/19 18:27, 18F
→
10/19 18:27, , 19F
10/19 18:27, 19F
→
10/19 18:33, , 20F
10/19 18:33, 20F
→
10/19 18:33, , 21F
10/19 18:33, 21F
http://www.bernsteinmedical.com/answers/does-finasteride-work-long-term/
A: With regard to efficacy, a recent long-term, uncontrolled study by Rossi
et al. reported that the beneficial effects of finasteride on hair growth
continued as time goes on and that a significant proportion of patients,
unchanged after 1 year, improved later on. In addition these patients
maintained a positive trend over time -– up to ten years. When comparing
different age groups, they found that subjects older than 30 years showed a
better hair growth in the long term than those who were younger. Of the 113
patients in the study followed for 10 years, only 14% worsened, whereas the
remaining 86% had benefits.
其實11463那篇都已經有10 YEAR TERM 的PAPER
only 14% worsene whereas the remaining 86% had benefits.
類似的結論自己找都找的到 不是一直跟網友要伸手牌
如果你有10年無效的PAPER 也可以拿出來交流呀
※ 編輯: baboosh (1.34.34.44), 10/19/2014 19:28:11
→
10/19 19:54, , 22F
10/19 19:54, 22F
→
10/19 19:57, , 23F
10/19 19:57, 23F
→
10/19 20:00, , 24F
10/19 20:00, 24F
→
10/19 20:00, , 25F
10/19 20:00, 25F
→
10/19 20:00, , 26F
10/19 20:00, 26F
→
10/19 20:00, , 27F
10/19 20:00, 27F
→
10/19 20:36, , 28F
10/19 20:36, 28F
→
10/19 20:53, , 29F
10/19 20:53, 29F
→
10/19 20:53, , 30F
10/19 20:53, 30F
推
10/19 22:44, , 31F
10/19 22:44, 31F
→
10/19 22:45, , 32F
10/19 22:45, 32F
→
10/19 22:45, , 33F
10/19 22:45, 33F
推
10/19 23:06, , 34F
10/19 23:06, 34F
→
10/19 23:06, , 35F
10/19 23:06, 35F
→
10/19 23:07, , 36F
10/19 23:07, 36F
→
10/19 23:07, , 37F
10/19 23:07, 37F
推
10/21 08:26, , 38F
10/21 08:26, 38F
→
10/21 08:27, , 39F
10/21 08:27, 39F
→
10/21 08:27, , 40F
10/21 08:27, 40F
→
10/21 11:15, , 41F
10/21 11:15, 41F
推
10/21 20:02, , 42F
10/21 20:02, 42F
推
10/23 01:42, , 43F
10/23 01:42, 43F
討論串 (同標題文章)