[討論] 拆封半年的保養品可以要求退換貨嗎?
這幾天在八卦版和黑店板都有這篇文章
有人在SKII專櫃買了美白保養品
結果用了兩三個月覺得沒效就把它束之高閣
又過了三個月想再把它拿出來用時
就發現產品已經氧化變質了
請問大家,如果是你們的話,會因此向專櫃要求退換貨嗎?
如果是我的話
畢竟產品都拆封半年了,之前也用了兩三個月
所以我會自認理虧
而且我覺得保養品這種東西本來就很容易變質
之前買過許多知名品牌的保養品也是
稍有不慎的話,幾個月甚至幾週就變質了
不過該名網友卻因此寄信到我信箱
還寫得落落長(雖然內容跟她的PO文大同小異)
所以我想請教一下各位板友對這件事的看法
是我不懂得爭取自己的權益,還是自己本來就理虧呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.168.12.251
推
09/25 15:45, , 1F
09/25 15:45, 1F
推
09/25 15:45, , 2F
09/25 15:45, 2F
→
09/25 15:45, , 3F
09/25 15:45, 3F
→
09/25 15:45, , 4F
09/25 15:45, 4F
→
09/25 15:46, , 5F
09/25 15:46, 5F
推
09/25 17:54, , 6F
09/25 17:54, 6F
推
09/25 19:15, , 7F
09/25 19:15, 7F
→
09/25 19:29, , 8F
09/25 19:29, 8F
→
09/25 19:29, , 9F
09/25 19:29, 9F
→
09/25 19:30, , 10F
09/25 19:30, 10F
→
09/25 19:30, , 11F
09/25 19:30, 11F
→
09/25 19:31, , 12F
09/25 19:31, 12F
→
09/25 19:31, , 13F
09/25 19:31, 13F
→
09/25 19:32, , 14F
09/25 19:32, 14F
→
09/25 19:33, , 15F
09/25 19:33, 15F
→
09/25 19:33, , 16F
09/25 19:33, 16F
→
09/25 19:34, , 17F
09/25 19:34, 17F
推
09/25 20:02, , 18F
09/25 20:02, 18F
→
09/25 20:02, , 19F
09/25 20:02, 19F
→
09/25 20:02, , 20F
09/25 20:02, 20F
→
09/25 20:03, , 21F
09/25 20:03, 21F
→
09/25 20:03, , 22F
09/25 20:03, 22F
→
09/25 20:04, , 23F
09/25 20:04, 23F
推
09/25 20:26, , 24F
09/25 20:26, 24F
推
09/25 22:58, , 25F
09/25 22:58, 25F
推
09/25 23:51, , 26F
09/25 23:51, 26F
→
09/25 23:51, , 27F
09/25 23:51, 27F
推
09/25 23:59, , 28F
09/25 23:59, 28F
→
09/26 00:26, , 29F
09/26 00:26, 29F
→
09/26 00:45, , 30F
09/26 00:45, 30F
→
09/26 00:46, , 31F
09/26 00:46, 31F
推
09/26 02:34, , 32F
09/26 02:34, 32F
推
09/26 08:08, , 33F
09/26 08:08, 33F
推
09/26 11:18, , 34F
09/26 11:18, 34F
推
09/26 11:37, , 35F
09/26 11:37, 35F
→
09/26 11:37, , 36F
09/26 11:37, 36F
→
09/26 11:38, , 37F
09/26 11:38, 37F
→
09/26 11:42, , 38F
09/26 11:42, 38F
→
09/26 11:43, , 39F
09/26 11:43, 39F
→
09/26 11:43, , 40F
09/26 11:43, 40F
→
09/26 11:44, , 41F
09/26 11:44, 41F
→
09/26 11:45, , 42F
09/26 11:45, 42F
→
09/26 11:45, , 43F
09/26 11:45, 43F
→
09/26 14:41, , 44F
09/26 14:41, 44F
→
09/26 14:41, , 45F
09/26 14:41, 45F
→
09/26 14:42, , 46F
09/26 14:42, 46F
→
09/26 14:43, , 47F
09/26 14:43, 47F
→
09/26 14:44, , 48F
09/26 14:44, 48F
→
09/26 14:45, , 49F
09/26 14:45, 49F
→
09/26 14:45, , 50F
09/26 14:45, 50F
推
09/26 16:31, , 51F
09/26 16:31, 51F
→
09/26 16:32, , 52F
09/26 16:32, 52F
推
09/26 22:06, , 53F
09/26 22:06, 53F
→
09/27 00:33, , 54F
09/27 00:33, 54F
→
09/27 00:34, , 55F
09/27 00:34, 55F
→
09/27 00:46, , 56F
09/27 00:46, 56F
推
09/27 01:08, , 57F
09/27 01:08, 57F
→
09/27 01:08, , 58F
09/27 01:08, 58F
→
09/27 01:09, , 59F
09/27 01:09, 59F
→
09/27 01:09, , 60F
09/27 01:09, 60F
推
09/27 01:14, , 61F
09/27 01:14, 61F
推
09/27 01:40, , 62F
09/27 01:40, 62F
→
09/27 01:41, , 63F
09/27 01:41, 63F
→
09/27 01:41, , 64F
09/27 01:41, 64F
→
09/27 01:43, , 65F
09/27 01:43, 65F
→
09/27 01:43, , 66F
09/27 01:43, 66F
→
09/27 02:00, , 67F
09/27 02:00, 67F
→
09/27 02:00, , 68F
09/27 02:00, 68F
推
09/27 20:13, , 69F
09/27 20:13, 69F
→
09/27 20:14, , 70F
09/27 20:14, 70F
→
09/27 20:15, , 71F
09/27 20:15, 71F
→
09/27 20:17, , 72F
09/27 20:17, 72F
→
09/27 20:18, , 73F
09/27 20:18, 73F
→
09/27 20:19, , 74F
09/27 20:19, 74F
→
09/27 20:19, , 75F
09/27 20:19, 75F
→
09/27 20:20, , 76F
09/27 20:20, 76F
→
09/27 20:21, , 77F
09/27 20:21, 77F
→
09/27 20:21, , 78F
09/27 20:21, 78F
→
09/27 20:22, , 79F
09/27 20:22, 79F
→
09/27 20:23, , 80F
09/27 20:23, 80F
→
09/27 20:24, , 81F
09/27 20:24, 81F
推
09/27 20:26, , 82F
09/27 20:26, 82F
→
09/27 20:27, , 83F
09/27 20:27, 83F
→
09/27 20:27, , 84F
09/27 20:27, 84F
→
09/27 20:28, , 85F
09/27 20:28, 85F
→
09/27 20:29, , 86F
09/27 20:29, 86F
→
09/27 20:40, , 87F
09/27 20:40, 87F
→
09/27 20:40, , 88F
09/27 20:40, 88F
推
09/29 13:52, , 89F
09/29 13:52, 89F
推
10/07 16:27, , 90F
10/07 16:27, 90F
→
10/08 09:15, , 91F
10/08 09:15, 91F
→
10/08 09:15, , 92F
10/08 09:15, 92F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):