剛剛看到悍馬車的慘劇
就在想 國軍花錢買造價不斐的悍馬
但現代戰爭 陸軍幾乎沒用
因為我們不可能登陸
防守的話也不用太多陸軍
幾乎都是靠空防跟海軍
本人分析後
覺得陸軍應該把錢挹注在那智傑
至於好處如下
1.可扶植台灣本土汽車業 帶動經濟提升
2.城市戰其實一班的車子比較好用
看看isis https://imgur.com/a/Gcwzo
可以偽裝 又行動方便
3.國君可以省下大筆經費
4.能順便培育汽修人才 以利職軍退伍後可銜接社會 發揮本職學能
5.那智傑貴為國產唯一有做過撞評的國產車 且得到優異分數
我覺得真的撞起來也能保障軍士官的安危 減少更多遺憾
希望有人能幫我轉到國防部或總統府 感謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.65.128.45
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/car/M.1514375499.A.8FA.html
推
12/27 19:52, , 1F
12/27 19:52, 1F
推
12/27 19:54, , 2F
12/27 19:54, 2F
推
12/27 19:56, , 3F
12/27 19:56, 3F
→
12/27 19:56, , 4F
12/27 19:56, 4F
推
12/27 19:56, , 5F
12/27 19:56, 5F
推
12/27 19:57, , 6F
12/27 19:57, 6F
噓
12/27 19:57, , 7F
12/27 19:57, 7F
推
12/27 19:58, , 8F
12/27 19:58, 8F
推
12/27 19:58, , 9F
12/27 19:58, 9F
→
12/27 19:59, , 10F
12/27 19:59, 10F
→
12/27 19:59, , 11F
12/27 19:59, 11F
推
12/27 20:01, , 12F
12/27 20:01, 12F
推
12/27 20:01, , 13F
12/27 20:01, 13F
噓
12/27 20:03, , 14F
12/27 20:03, 14F
噓
12/27 20:03, , 15F
12/27 20:03, 15F
推
12/27 20:06, , 16F
12/27 20:06, 16F
→
12/27 20:06, , 17F
12/27 20:06, 17F
→
12/27 20:06, , 18F
12/27 20:06, 18F
推
12/27 20:08, , 19F
12/27 20:08, 19F
噓
12/27 20:10, , 20F
12/27 20:10, 20F
推
12/27 20:13, , 21F
12/27 20:13, 21F
※ 編輯: xiciko (61.65.128.45), 12/27/2017 20:14:48
※ 編輯: xiciko (61.65.128.45), 12/27/2017 20:15:29
推
12/27 20:22, , 22F
12/27 20:22, 22F
→
12/27 20:22, , 23F
12/27 20:22, 23F
噓
12/27 20:23, , 24F
12/27 20:23, 24F
噓
12/27 20:26, , 25F
12/27 20:26, 25F
噓
12/27 20:28, , 26F
12/27 20:28, 26F
噓
12/27 20:29, , 27F
12/27 20:29, 27F
→
12/27 20:29, , 28F
12/27 20:29, 28F
推
12/27 20:30, , 29F
12/27 20:30, 29F
→
12/27 20:33, , 30F
12/27 20:33, 30F
噓
12/27 20:34, , 31F
12/27 20:34, 31F
→
12/27 20:35, , 32F
12/27 20:35, 32F
推
12/27 20:39, , 33F
12/27 20:39, 33F
噓
12/27 20:48, , 34F
12/27 20:48, 34F
→
12/27 20:53, , 35F
12/27 20:53, 35F
→
12/27 20:59, , 36F
12/27 20:59, 36F
推
12/27 21:02, , 37F
12/27 21:02, 37F
噓
12/27 21:02, , 38F
12/27 21:02, 38F
→
12/27 21:03, , 39F
12/27 21:03, 39F
→
12/27 21:03, , 40F
12/27 21:03, 40F
推
12/27 21:08, , 41F
12/27 21:08, 41F
噓
12/27 21:09, , 42F
12/27 21:09, 42F
推
12/27 21:18, , 43F
12/27 21:18, 43F
噓
12/27 21:20, , 44F
12/27 21:20, 44F
推
12/27 21:29, , 45F
12/27 21:29, 45F
噓
12/27 21:37, , 46F
12/27 21:37, 46F
→
12/27 21:49, , 47F
12/27 21:49, 47F
噓
12/27 21:50, , 48F
12/27 21:50, 48F
噓
12/27 22:42, , 49F
12/27 22:42, 49F
推
12/27 22:44, , 50F
12/27 22:44, 50F
噓
12/27 22:47, , 51F
12/27 22:47, 51F
噓
12/27 23:26, , 52F
12/27 23:26, 52F
推
12/27 23:57, , 53F
12/27 23:57, 53F
推
12/28 00:47, , 54F
12/28 00:47, 54F
→
12/28 03:05, , 55F
12/28 03:05, 55F
噓
12/28 04:05, , 56F
12/28 04:05, 56F
→
12/28 07:38, , 57F
12/28 07:38, 57F
推
12/28 07:43, , 58F
12/28 07:43, 58F
→
12/28 09:18, , 59F
12/28 09:18, 59F
推
12/28 19:04, , 60F
12/28 19:04, 60F
噓
12/29 01:28, , 61F
12/29 01:28, 61F
噓
12/29 12:20, , 62F
12/29 12:20, 62F
→
12/29 12:33, , 63F
12/29 12:33, 63F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):