[新聞] 傻眼!車停家門前 6天遭開40罰單車主怒
原文連結:
http://news.tvbs.com.tw/local/770563
原文內容:
傻眼!車停家門前 6天遭開40罰單車主怒
2017/09/15 11:33
記者 楊雅琳 / 攝影 廖宗慶 報導
桃園一位車主在自家門前停車,但卻遭人每2個小時拍照檢舉,6天吃上40張罰單,得罰3
萬多元罰鍰,讓車主很生氣投訴,只不過住家門前是紅線,警方勘查現場後,確認有違規
,開罰沒有疑慮。
記者vs.車主家屬:「有汽車、有機車。」
紅單一張一張放在桌上,數量多到讓人傻眼。
車主陳茂枝:「我突然之間,(郵差)叫我拿印章,我說我用簽的就好了,他說你簽不了
這麼多。」
車主陳茂枝:「我也覺得很奇怪啊,應該是今天中華民國破紀錄的。」
郵差一次送一疊罰單來,車主很生氣,因為看看這些被舉發的照片,早中晚不同時間同個
角度,幾乎隔兩個小時,就被人檢舉。
讓他在8月16到21日,這6天被開罰40張罰單,機車跟汽車都有,加起來得繳三萬多元的罰
鍰。
車主陳茂枝:「假如是說全社區裡面的,你都舉發我還沒話講,你針對著我,2個小時、2
個半小時就照一張。」
車主說住家門口先前交通混亂,為了不讓其他車輛亂停,他申請畫紅線,但明明是停自家
車卻屢屢遭到檢舉,質疑是被人惡意針對,想要申請將紅線剃除。
交大執法組長陳國煌:「就算剃除(紅線)之後,因為它屬於轉角處,依法規規定,轉角
10公尺內還是不能停車,仍然違反相關法令。」
不過民眾檢舉如果屬實,每個兩小時可以再舉發一次,因此就法規上並沒有問題,雖然很
不甘心,但還是只得乖乖繳費。
心得/說明:
其實已經畫紅線上去了就不應該有投機取巧的心態,不管是不是針對,本來就不應該在紅
線停車了,更何況還是在轉角處。
如果照他說的申請紅線剃除後,有別的車輛來停,他就會比較開心嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.40.13.39
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/car/M.1505466743.A.E8B.html
推
09/15 17:14, , 1F
09/15 17:14, 1F
噓
09/15 17:14, , 2F
09/15 17:14, 2F
→
09/15 17:14, , 3F
09/15 17:14, 3F
→
09/15 17:15, , 4F
09/15 17:15, 4F
→
09/15 17:15, , 5F
09/15 17:15, 5F
推
09/15 17:16, , 6F
09/15 17:16, 6F
推
09/15 17:16, , 7F
09/15 17:16, 7F
推
09/15 17:16, , 8F
09/15 17:16, 8F
→
09/15 17:17, , 9F
09/15 17:17, 9F
推
09/15 17:18, , 10F
09/15 17:18, 10F
推
09/15 17:18, , 11F
09/15 17:18, 11F
噓
09/15 17:18, , 12F
09/15 17:18, 12F
推
09/15 17:21, , 13F
09/15 17:21, 13F
推
09/15 17:23, , 14F
09/15 17:23, 14F
推
09/15 17:23, , 15F
09/15 17:23, 15F
推
09/15 17:23, , 16F
09/15 17:23, 16F
推
09/15 17:23, , 17F
09/15 17:23, 17F
推
09/15 17:23, , 18F
09/15 17:23, 18F
推
09/15 17:25, , 19F
09/15 17:25, 19F
推
09/15 17:26, , 20F
09/15 17:26, 20F
推
09/15 17:28, , 21F
09/15 17:28, 21F
推
09/15 17:28, , 22F
09/15 17:28, 22F
推
09/15 17:28, , 23F
09/15 17:28, 23F
→
09/15 17:29, , 24F
09/15 17:29, 24F
推
09/15 17:31, , 25F
09/15 17:31, 25F
噓
09/15 17:31, , 26F
09/15 17:31, 26F
→
09/15 17:32, , 27F
09/15 17:32, 27F
推
09/15 17:32, , 28F
09/15 17:32, 28F
→
09/15 17:34, , 29F
09/15 17:34, 29F
推
09/15 17:34, , 30F
09/15 17:34, 30F
推
09/15 17:42, , 31F
09/15 17:42, 31F
推
09/15 17:43, , 32F
09/15 17:43, 32F
→
09/15 17:43, , 33F
09/15 17:43, 33F
推
09/15 17:52, , 34F
09/15 17:52, 34F
推
09/15 17:52, , 35F
09/15 17:52, 35F
噓
09/15 17:52, , 36F
09/15 17:52, 36F
推
09/15 17:53, , 37F
09/15 17:53, 37F
推
09/15 17:55, , 38F
09/15 17:55, 38F
推
09/15 17:55, , 39F
09/15 17:55, 39F
還有 93 則推文
噓
09/15 22:12, , 133F
09/15 22:12, 133F
推
09/15 22:15, , 134F
09/15 22:15, 134F
推
09/15 23:27, , 135F
09/15 23:27, 135F
推
09/15 23:30, , 136F
09/15 23:30, 136F
推
09/16 00:04, , 137F
09/16 00:04, 137F
推
09/16 00:19, , 138F
09/16 00:19, 138F
→
09/16 00:21, , 139F
09/16 00:21, 139F
推
09/16 00:23, , 140F
09/16 00:23, 140F
→
09/16 00:55, , 141F
09/16 00:55, 141F
推
09/16 00:56, , 142F
09/16 00:56, 142F
推
09/16 01:14, , 143F
09/16 01:14, 143F
推
09/16 01:46, , 144F
09/16 01:46, 144F
→
09/16 06:45, , 145F
09/16 06:45, 145F
推
09/16 07:22, , 146F
09/16 07:22, 146F
→
09/16 08:12, , 147F
09/16 08:12, 147F
推
09/16 08:42, , 148F
09/16 08:42, 148F
推
09/16 11:54, , 149F
09/16 11:54, 149F
推
09/16 14:44, , 150F
09/16 14:44, 150F
推
09/16 15:06, , 151F
09/16 15:06, 151F
推
09/16 15:10, , 152F
09/16 15:10, 152F
推
09/16 15:11, , 153F
09/16 15:11, 153F
推
09/16 15:56, , 154F
09/16 15:56, 154F
推
09/16 18:12, , 155F
09/16 18:12, 155F
推
09/17 02:47, , 156F
09/17 02:47, 156F
推
09/17 06:54, , 157F
09/17 06:54, 157F
推
09/17 11:28, , 158F
09/17 11:28, 158F
→
09/17 11:28, , 159F
09/17 11:28, 159F
推
09/17 13:42, , 160F
09/17 13:42, 160F
噓
09/17 13:48, , 161F
09/17 13:48, 161F
推
09/17 15:03, , 162F
09/17 15:03, 162F
→
09/17 15:03, , 163F
09/17 15:03, 163F
→
09/17 15:03, , 164F
09/17 15:03, 164F
推
09/17 17:22, , 165F
09/17 17:22, 165F
→
09/17 17:23, , 166F
09/17 17:23, 166F
推
09/17 18:51, , 167F
09/17 18:51, 167F
推
09/17 20:46, , 168F
09/17 20:46, 168F
→
09/17 22:56, , 169F
09/17 22:56, 169F
→
09/17 22:57, , 170F
09/17 22:57, 170F
推
09/18 00:04, , 171F
09/18 00:04, 171F
推
09/18 08:08, , 172F
09/18 08:08, 172F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):