[問題] CX-9和odyssey該選哪台好 ?
這兩台車皆看過試駕過了....但陷入了天人交戰
我們家使用這台車時平常出門正常坐車的人數會是6人,含2個小孩坐汽座。
依據以往的經驗,這台車會使用15年以上,也就是最少會是使用到老大高中畢業。
目前的想法配置是如下:
CX-9 odyssey 7人坐
小孩小時 第二排1個大人1個小孩 第二排2個大人
第三排1個大人1個小孩 第三排2個小孩 (中間有走道大人可過去)
小孩大時 男生老大和媽媽坐第二排 第三排也算寬敞,可以隨便坐
女生老二和老婆坐第三排
(但即使是女生長途第三排也不好坐)
就以上空間表現應是 O >> CX-9
但問題是CX-9 的 安全性、性能、隔音和行車的穩定性 皆>>> odyssey
嗯...油耗和停車是O > CX-9
使我們陷入了不知道選哪台的窘境....
不知各位有經驗的大大有沒有什麼建議呢?
並請問妥善率和零件的維修金額哪者較佳呢?
謝謝
--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.236.20.139
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/car/M.1502551062.A.C0C.html
推
08/12 23:18, , 1F
08/12 23:18, 1F
推
08/12 23:19, , 2F
08/12 23:19, 2F
忘了說,其實我們出遊還蠻常爬山的.....這也是需求之一
推
08/12 23:19, , 3F
08/12 23:19, 3F
推
08/12 23:19, , 4F
08/12 23:19, 4F
推
08/12 23:19, , 5F
08/12 23:19, 5F
→
08/12 23:20, , 6F
08/12 23:20, 6F
在台灣的後勤應是O較佳吧!?
推
08/12 23:22, , 7F
08/12 23:22, 7F
推
08/12 23:22, , 8F
08/12 23:22, 8F
→
08/12 23:23, , 9F
08/12 23:23, 9F
→
08/12 23:23, , 10F
08/12 23:23, 10F
→
08/12 23:24, , 11F
08/12 23:24, 11F
推
08/12 23:26, , 12F
08/12 23:26, 12F
推
08/12 23:27, , 13F
08/12 23:27, 13F
推
08/12 23:27, , 14F
08/12 23:27, 14F
→
08/12 23:27, , 15F
08/12 23:27, 15F
推
08/12 23:27, , 16F
08/12 23:27, 16F
→
08/12 23:29, , 17F
08/12 23:29, 17F
推
08/12 23:30, , 18F
08/12 23:30, 18F
→
08/12 23:30, , 19F
08/12 23:30, 19F
價差有點多......
推
08/12 23:30, , 20F
08/12 23:30, 20F
推
08/12 23:31, , 21F
08/12 23:31, 21F
推
08/12 23:33, , 22F
08/12 23:33, 22F
那天剛好沒試到第三排(不太敢帶皮小孩去試,怕出了什麼差錯....><)
但第二排是CX-9比O穩蠻多的...
→
08/12 23:34, , 23F
08/12 23:34, 23F
推
08/12 23:36, , 24F
08/12 23:36, 24F
推
08/12 23:38, , 25F
08/12 23:38, 25F
請問哪裡會銹?
※ 編輯: icrt1000 (36.236.20.139), 08/12/2017 23:41:02
推
08/12 23:42, , 26F
08/12 23:42, 26F
推
08/12 23:44, , 27F
08/12 23:44, 27F
→
08/12 23:45, , 28F
08/12 23:45, 28F
請問有推薦更適合C/P值更高可坐六人的車嗎? 謝謝~~
→
08/12 23:45, , 29F
08/12 23:45, 29F
→
08/12 23:46, , 30F
08/12 23:46, 30F
推
08/12 23:49, , 31F
08/12 23:49, 31F
→
08/12 23:50, , 32F
08/12 23:50, 32F
???
還有 54 則推文
還有 8 段內文
→
08/13 01:27, , 87F
08/13 01:27, 87F
推
08/13 01:27, , 88F
08/13 01:27, 88F
→
08/13 01:42, , 89F
08/13 01:42, 89F
→
08/13 01:43, , 90F
08/13 01:43, 90F
推
08/13 02:03, , 91F
08/13 02:03, 91F
→
08/13 02:03, , 92F
08/13 02:03, 92F
噓
08/13 05:18, , 93F
08/13 05:18, 93F
→
08/13 07:06, , 94F
08/13 07:06, 94F
推
08/13 07:13, , 95F
08/13 07:13, 95F
→
08/13 08:03, , 96F
08/13 08:03, 96F
推
08/13 08:06, , 97F
08/13 08:06, 97F
推
08/13 08:11, , 98F
08/13 08:11, 98F
→
08/13 08:15, , 99F
08/13 08:15, 99F
推
08/13 08:16, , 100F
08/13 08:16, 100F
→
08/13 08:16, , 101F
08/13 08:16, 101F
推
08/13 08:27, , 102F
08/13 08:27, 102F
推
08/13 08:27, , 103F
08/13 08:27, 103F
推
08/13 08:37, , 104F
08/13 08:37, 104F
推
08/13 08:59, , 105F
08/13 08:59, 105F
→
08/13 08:59, , 106F
08/13 08:59, 106F
推
08/13 09:48, , 107F
08/13 09:48, 107F
推
08/13 09:49, , 108F
08/13 09:49, 108F
推
08/13 10:25, , 109F
08/13 10:25, 109F
推
08/13 10:31, , 110F
08/13 10:31, 110F
推
08/13 10:32, , 111F
08/13 10:32, 111F
推
08/13 11:19, , 112F
08/13 11:19, 112F
推
08/13 12:38, , 113F
08/13 12:38, 113F
→
08/13 12:38, , 114F
08/13 12:38, 114F
推
08/13 13:12, , 115F
08/13 13:12, 115F
→
08/13 13:31, , 116F
08/13 13:31, 116F
推
08/13 13:38, , 117F
08/13 13:38, 117F
推
08/13 14:06, , 118F
08/13 14:06, 118F
→
08/13 14:07, , 119F
08/13 14:07, 119F
推
08/13 14:24, , 120F
08/13 14:24, 120F
推
08/13 15:18, , 121F
08/13 15:18, 121F
推
08/13 16:22, , 122F
08/13 16:22, 122F
推
08/13 17:32, , 123F
08/13 17:32, 123F
推
08/13 20:11, , 124F
08/13 20:11, 124F
→
08/13 22:17, , 125F
08/13 22:17, 125F
→
08/16 01:04, , 126F
08/16 01:04, 126F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):