Re: [爆卦] 遊覽車安不安全 最大因素是人
※ 引述《chandler0227 (錢德勒)》之銘言:
: 先說結論,除了駕駛因素外,台灣的大客車法規也是頗畸形
: 話說這輛是1998年出廠的,但台灣的大客車結構法規似乎是2004年左右才出現
: 台灣的大客車結構強度測試標準基本上是抄 ECE Regulation No. 66
: https://goo.gl/MYuZE3
: 修正後的R66是要通過"實際測試",拿台遊覽車來實際翻覆看看結構強度夠不夠
想問大家下交流道的大灣大家都開多少勒
我已經是特慢車惹下交流道例如新店大灣還是會開到40踩很輕喔OB
然後後面有追車我會很緊張
想必開到60一定有很多吧!
60的離心力有很大嘛?
那那些賽車兩百的離心力是不是嚇死人
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 27.147.45.93
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/car/M.1487049478.A.412.html
推
02/14 13:19, , 1F
02/14 13:19, 1F
→
02/14 13:20, , 2F
02/14 13:20, 2F
→
02/14 13:20, , 3F
02/14 13:20, 3F
推
02/14 13:27, , 4F
02/14 13:27, 4F
推
02/14 13:31, , 5F
02/14 13:31, 5F
推
02/14 13:35, , 6F
02/14 13:35, 6F
→
02/14 13:35, , 7F
02/14 13:35, 7F
推
02/14 13:40, , 8F
02/14 13:40, 8F
→
02/14 13:40, , 9F
02/14 13:40, 9F
→
02/14 13:45, , 10F
02/14 13:45, 10F
推
02/14 13:45, , 11F
02/14 13:45, 11F
→
02/14 13:46, , 12F
02/14 13:46, 12F
→
02/14 13:47, , 13F
02/14 13:47, 13F
推
02/14 14:02, , 14F
02/14 14:02, 14F
→
02/14 14:29, , 15F
02/14 14:29, 15F
推
02/14 15:00, , 16F
02/14 15:00, 16F
→
02/14 15:01, , 17F
02/14 15:01, 17F
推
02/14 15:01, , 18F
02/14 15:01, 18F
→
02/14 15:02, , 19F
02/14 15:02, 19F
推
02/14 15:40, , 20F
02/14 15:40, 20F
推
02/14 15:44, , 21F
02/14 15:44, 21F
推
02/14 15:44, , 22F
02/14 15:44, 22F
推
02/14 16:06, , 23F
02/14 16:06, 23F
→
02/14 16:06, , 24F
02/14 16:06, 24F
→
02/14 16:06, , 25F
02/14 16:06, 25F
→
02/14 16:07, , 26F
02/14 16:07, 26F
→
02/14 16:07, , 27F
02/14 16:07, 27F
推
02/14 16:15, , 28F
02/14 16:15, 28F
推
02/14 16:36, , 29F
02/14 16:36, 29F
噓
02/14 16:37, , 30F
02/14 16:37, 30F
推
02/14 16:50, , 31F
02/14 16:50, 31F
推
02/14 17:00, , 32F
02/14 17:00, 32F
→
02/14 17:00, , 33F
02/14 17:00, 33F
→
02/14 17:00, , 34F
02/14 17:00, 34F
→
02/14 17:05, , 35F
02/14 17:05, 35F
推
02/14 17:09, , 36F
02/14 17:09, 36F
推
02/14 19:13, , 37F
02/14 19:13, 37F
推
02/14 19:55, , 38F
02/14 19:55, 38F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 4 篇):