[討論] SIENTA是否會影響中型房車市場?
各位覺得SIENTA的推出會擠壓到中型房車市場嗎?
中型房車市場一直是台灣需求最大的一種車型
不論是神A、馬3、CIVIC等等,在街上看到在跑的基本上都是這類車
但是SIENTA的加入可能會把這些銷售數字重新洗牌
過去WISH的營業車感覺可能太重,但現行法規SIENTA這類有拉門的車子
可能沒辦法當成計程車用
再加上滑門的設計與可傾倒椅背,功能性非常高,可以滿足很多種類型的消費者
光這點應該就可以完勝多數四門車房車,五門可能還稍微有一點機會反擊
(但中型房車很少五門)
至於外觀,我只能說大家品味會變,因為這類方正的車子這陣子在日本也出現好多
不知道以後會不會變主流,以上一點SIENTA感想跟大家討論看看
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.171.135.135
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/car/M.1476027878.A.CDD.html
→
10/09 23:46, , 1F
10/09 23:46, 1F
推
10/09 23:47, , 2F
10/09 23:47, 2F
推
10/09 23:48, , 3F
10/09 23:48, 3F
噓
10/09 23:48, , 4F
10/09 23:48, 4F
→
10/09 23:49, , 5F
10/09 23:49, 5F
→
10/09 23:50, , 6F
10/09 23:50, 6F
推
10/09 23:50, , 7F
10/09 23:50, 7F
→
10/09 23:50, , 8F
10/09 23:50, 8F
→
10/09 23:51, , 9F
10/09 23:51, 9F
→
10/09 23:51, , 10F
10/09 23:51, 10F
→
10/09 23:52, , 11F
10/09 23:52, 11F
推
10/10 00:00, , 12F
10/10 00:00, 12F
→
10/10 00:00, , 13F
10/10 00:00, 13F
→
10/10 00:04, , 14F
10/10 00:04, 14F
噓
10/10 00:05, , 15F
10/10 00:05, 15F
推
10/10 00:06, , 16F
10/10 00:06, 16F
→
10/10 00:07, , 17F
10/10 00:07, 17F
推
10/10 00:10, , 18F
10/10 00:10, 18F
→
10/10 00:11, , 19F
10/10 00:11, 19F
推
10/10 00:17, , 20F
10/10 00:17, 20F
→
10/10 00:25, , 21F
10/10 00:25, 21F
推
10/10 00:42, , 22F
10/10 00:42, 22F
→
10/10 00:44, , 23F
10/10 00:44, 23F
→
10/10 00:44, , 24F
10/10 00:44, 24F
推
10/10 00:53, , 25F
10/10 00:53, 25F
→
10/10 00:54, , 26F
10/10 00:54, 26F
→
10/10 00:56, , 27F
10/10 00:56, 27F
→
10/10 00:56, , 28F
10/10 00:56, 28F
→
10/10 00:58, , 29F
10/10 00:58, 29F
→
10/10 00:59, , 30F
10/10 00:59, 30F
→
10/10 00:59, , 31F
10/10 00:59, 31F
→
10/10 01:03, , 32F
10/10 01:03, 32F
噓
10/10 01:11, , 33F
10/10 01:11, 33F
推
10/10 01:11, , 34F
10/10 01:11, 34F
→
10/10 01:13, , 35F
10/10 01:13, 35F
→
10/10 01:13, , 36F
10/10 01:13, 36F
噓
10/10 01:14, , 37F
10/10 01:14, 37F
→
10/10 01:14, , 38F
10/10 01:14, 38F
→
10/10 01:15, , 39F
10/10 01:15, 39F
推
10/10 01:15, , 40F
10/10 01:15, 40F
→
10/10 01:22, , 41F
10/10 01:22, 41F
→
10/10 01:31, , 42F
10/10 01:31, 42F
→
10/10 01:31, , 43F
10/10 01:31, 43F
→
10/10 01:32, , 44F
10/10 01:32, 44F
推
10/10 01:42, , 45F
10/10 01:42, 45F
噓
10/10 02:08, , 46F
10/10 02:08, 46F
推
10/10 02:22, , 47F
10/10 02:22, 47F
→
10/10 02:29, , 48F
10/10 02:29, 48F
推
10/10 02:49, , 49F
10/10 02:49, 49F
→
10/10 02:50, , 50F
10/10 02:50, 50F
→
10/10 03:22, , 51F
10/10 03:22, 51F
推
10/10 03:47, , 52F
10/10 03:47, 52F
→
10/10 03:49, , 53F
10/10 03:49, 53F
推
10/10 06:19, , 54F
10/10 06:19, 54F
→
10/10 06:53, , 55F
10/10 06:53, 55F
推
10/10 08:56, , 56F
10/10 08:56, 56F
→
10/10 08:56, , 57F
10/10 08:56, 57F
→
10/10 08:58, , 58F
10/10 08:58, 58F
→
10/10 08:59, , 59F
10/10 08:59, 59F
原來是這樣,謝謝H大解釋,受教了
推
10/10 10:22, , 60F
10/10 10:22, 60F
→
10/10 10:22, , 61F
10/10 10:22, 61F
推
10/10 11:51, , 62F
10/10 11:51, 62F
推
10/10 13:20, , 63F
10/10 13:20, 63F
推
10/10 15:04, , 64F
10/10 15:04, 64F
→
10/10 15:05, , 65F
10/10 15:05, 65F
推
10/10 15:29, , 66F
10/10 15:29, 66F
→
10/10 15:29, , 67F
10/10 15:29, 67F
推
10/10 17:56, , 68F
10/10 17:56, 68F
→
10/10 17:56, , 69F
10/10 17:56, 69F
→
10/10 19:38, , 70F
10/10 19:38, 70F
→
10/10 19:38, , 71F
10/10 19:38, 71F
推
10/10 21:31, , 72F
10/10 21:31, 72F
推
10/11 05:16, , 73F
10/11 05:16, 73F
→
10/11 09:12, , 74F
10/11 09:12, 74F
推
10/11 12:52, , 75F
10/11 12:52, 75F
→
10/11 12:52, , 76F
10/11 12:52, 76F
※ 編輯: Kaochairman (111.81.37.129), 10/11/2016 15:55:16
推
10/11 16:51, , 77F
10/11 16:51, 77F
→
10/11 16:52, , 78F
10/11 16:52, 78F
推
10/11 19:28, , 79F
10/11 19:28, 79F
→
10/11 19:28, , 80F
10/11 19:28, 80F
噓
10/11 21:39, , 81F
10/11 21:39, 81F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):