[討論] 老一輩的人都不注重主被動安全?
大家豪
ukkk我是個大學生,平常沒事就在家裡看看Go車誌的試車影片
長久下來也累積了對於汽車主被動安全的觀念
目前開的車是家裡破15年里程22萬公里的拖鞋
那天載家人去買菜,家人考慮買新車給我開,問我二手車價大概是多少
不過我認為目前拖鞋還是可以開,就回答車還可以開,唯一缺點是沒有安全氣囊
而且要買的話就乾脆買新車了,現在很多新的安全科技配備
講完只聽到
呿~(冷笑一聲)
安全氣囊根本沒用,不用想那些東西,自己開好車就好了
請問有沒有老一輩都比較不注重主被動安全的傾向?
若是真的如此是不是該買內建驅逐他車功能的小鴨呢
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.72.173.42
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/car/M.1454820572.A.0EB.html
推
02/07 12:50, , 1F
02/07 12:50, 1F
推
02/07 12:53, , 2F
02/07 12:53, 2F
推
02/07 12:53, , 3F
02/07 12:53, 3F
推
02/07 12:56, , 4F
02/07 12:56, 4F
→
02/07 12:56, , 5F
02/07 12:56, 5F
應該說,家人要買二手的"新"車給我
不過我個人想說要買就買新車,就回絕掉囉
推
02/07 12:57, , 6F
02/07 12:57, 6F
推
02/07 12:59, , 7F
02/07 12:59, 7F
推
02/07 13:03, , 8F
02/07 13:03, 8F
※ 編輯: UkZong (42.72.173.42), 02/07/2016 13:08:08
→
02/07 13:07, , 9F
02/07 13:07, 9F
推
02/07 13:07, , 10F
02/07 13:07, 10F
→
02/07 13:08, , 11F
02/07 13:08, 11F
→
02/07 13:08, , 12F
02/07 13:08, 12F
→
02/07 13:09, , 13F
02/07 13:09, 13F
推
02/07 13:17, , 14F
02/07 13:17, 14F
推
02/07 13:17, , 15F
02/07 13:17, 15F
推
02/07 13:19, , 16F
02/07 13:19, 16F
→
02/07 13:21, , 17F
02/07 13:21, 17F
推
02/07 13:22, , 18F
02/07 13:22, 18F
→
02/07 13:22, , 19F
02/07 13:22, 19F
推
02/07 13:38, , 20F
02/07 13:38, 20F
推
02/07 13:43, , 21F
02/07 13:43, 21F
→
02/07 13:43, , 22F
02/07 13:43, 22F
→
02/07 13:47, , 23F
02/07 13:47, 23F
→
02/07 13:48, , 24F
02/07 13:48, 24F
→
02/07 13:48, , 25F
02/07 13:48, 25F
→
02/07 13:49, , 26F
02/07 13:49, 26F
→
02/07 13:49, , 27F
02/07 13:49, 27F
→
02/07 13:50, , 28F
02/07 13:50, 28F
推
02/07 13:57, , 29F
02/07 13:57, 29F
推
02/07 13:58, , 30F
02/07 13:58, 30F
→
02/07 13:59, , 31F
02/07 13:59, 31F
噓
02/07 14:01, , 32F
02/07 14:01, 32F
推
02/07 14:03, , 33F
02/07 14:03, 33F
推
02/07 14:04, , 34F
02/07 14:04, 34F
→
02/07 14:04, , 35F
02/07 14:04, 35F
推
02/07 14:07, , 36F
02/07 14:07, 36F
→
02/07 14:20, , 37F
02/07 14:20, 37F
推
02/07 14:36, , 38F
02/07 14:36, 38F
→
02/07 14:37, , 39F
02/07 14:37, 39F
噓
02/07 14:41, , 40F
02/07 14:41, 40F
推
02/07 14:42, , 41F
02/07 14:42, 41F
推
02/07 14:44, , 42F
02/07 14:44, 42F
噓
02/07 14:45, , 43F
02/07 14:45, 43F
→
02/07 14:45, , 44F
02/07 14:45, 44F
噓
02/07 14:54, , 45F
02/07 14:54, 45F
→
02/07 14:57, , 46F
02/07 14:57, 46F
推
02/07 15:20, , 47F
02/07 15:20, 47F
推
02/07 15:34, , 48F
02/07 15:34, 48F
→
02/07 15:34, , 49F
02/07 15:34, 49F
→
02/07 15:34, , 50F
02/07 15:34, 50F
推
02/07 15:50, , 51F
02/07 15:50, 51F
→
02/07 16:24, , 52F
02/07 16:24, 52F
→
02/07 16:39, , 53F
02/07 16:39, 53F
推
02/07 16:43, , 54F
02/07 16:43, 54F
推
02/07 16:49, , 55F
02/07 16:49, 55F
→
02/07 16:49, , 56F
02/07 16:49, 56F
推
02/07 17:02, , 57F
02/07 17:02, 57F
→
02/07 17:05, , 58F
02/07 17:05, 58F
→
02/07 17:05, , 59F
02/07 17:05, 59F
推
02/07 18:27, , 60F
02/07 18:27, 60F
推
02/07 20:01, , 61F
02/07 20:01, 61F
→
02/07 20:01, , 62F
02/07 20:01, 62F
推
02/08 17:10, , 63F
02/08 17:10, 63F
→
02/08 17:10, , 64F
02/08 17:10, 64F
推
02/08 17:18, , 65F
02/08 17:18, 65F
→
02/08 17:18, , 66F
02/08 17:18, 66F
→
02/10 00:44, , 67F
02/10 00:44, 67F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):
討論
28
67