[問題] LUXGEN S5 媲美BMW新7系列?
剛剛看到T台的汽車節目，主持人請四位來賓推薦80萬的汽車
結果第一位陳姓來賓馬上推薦 LUXGEN S5 ECO HYPER
因為他說S5的配備，花200萬都不一定買的到
接著以BMW這次改款的7系列來跟S5做比較
所以想請問一下鄉民，這次S5真的有那麼好嗎?
因為看到鄉民對這台的評價好像不是太好
但那些汽車雜誌的權威卻認為S5可以跟BMW 7系列相比
不知道有沒有鄉民是有開過7系列跟S5可以分享一下心得
畢竟這輩子還沒開過7系列，走進展示間業務應該也不會鳥我，更別說試乘了
但如果S5能夠媲美7系列的話，說真的也不用花那麼多錢去買BMW
直接買S5就好，這樣還多出許多預算來
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.41.94.43
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/car/M.1447118007.A.5A4.html
推
11/10 09:15, , 1F
11/10 09:15, 1F
推
11/10 09:16, , 2F
11/10 09:16, 2F
推
11/10 09:16, , 3F
11/10 09:16, 3F
→
11/10 09:16, , 4F
11/10 09:16, 4F
→
11/10 09:17, , 5F
11/10 09:17, 5F
→
11/10 09:18, , 6F
11/10 09:18, 6F
→
11/10 09:21, , 7F
11/10 09:21, 7F
噓
11/10 09:25, , 8F
11/10 09:25, 8F
推
11/10 09:26, , 9F
11/10 09:26, 9F
噓
11/10 09:36, , 10F
11/10 09:36, 10F
推
11/10 09:39, , 11F
11/10 09:39, 11F
推
11/10 09:43, , 12F
11/10 09:43, 12F
推
11/10 09:44, , 13F
11/10 09:44, 13F
推
11/10 09:45, , 14F
11/10 09:45, 14F
→
11/10 09:46, , 15F
11/10 09:46, 15F
噓
11/10 09:47, , 16F
11/10 09:47, 16F
噓
11/10 09:53, , 17F
11/10 09:53, 17F
推
11/10 10:01, , 18F
11/10 10:01, 18F
→
11/10 10:02, , 19F
11/10 10:02, 19F
噓
11/10 10:05, , 20F
11/10 10:05, 20F
推
11/10 10:14, , 21F
11/10 10:14, 21F
→
11/10 10:15, , 22F
11/10 10:15, 22F
推
11/10 10:19, , 23F
11/10 10:19, 23F
→
11/10 10:20, , 24F
11/10 10:20, 24F
推
11/10 10:27, , 25F
11/10 10:27, 25F
→
11/10 10:28, , 26F
11/10 10:28, 26F
推
11/10 10:28, , 27F
11/10 10:28, 27F
推
11/10 10:34, , 28F
11/10 10:34, 28F
→
11/10 10:42, , 29F
11/10 10:42, 29F
推
11/10 10:43, , 30F
11/10 10:43, 30F
推
11/10 10:46, , 31F
11/10 10:46, 31F
→
11/10 10:47, , 32F
11/10 10:47, 32F
噓
11/10 10:51, , 33F
11/10 10:51, 33F
→
11/10 10:51, , 34F
11/10 10:51, 34F
→
11/10 10:52, , 35F
11/10 10:52, 35F
推
11/10 10:54, , 36F
11/10 10:54, 36F
推
11/10 10:56, , 37F
11/10 10:56, 37F
→
11/10 10:56, , 38F
11/10 10:56, 38F
→
11/10 10:56, , 39F
11/10 10:56, 39F
還有 33 則推文
→
11/10 12:12, , 73F
11/10 12:12, 73F
→
11/10 12:12, , 74F
11/10 12:12, 74F
→
11/10 12:13, , 75F
11/10 12:13, 75F
→
11/10 12:13, , 76F
11/10 12:13, 76F
→
11/10 12:13, , 77F
11/10 12:13, 77F
→
11/10 12:19, , 78F
11/10 12:19, 78F
→
11/10 12:26, , 79F
11/10 12:26, 79F
→
11/10 12:30, , 80F
11/10 12:30, 80F
推
11/10 12:30, , 81F
11/10 12:30, 81F
→
11/10 12:31, , 82F
11/10 12:31, 82F
推
11/10 12:45, , 83F
11/10 12:45, 83F
→
11/10 12:47, , 84F
11/10 12:47, 84F
→
11/10 12:47, , 85F
11/10 12:47, 85F
→
11/10 12:48, , 86F
11/10 12:48, 86F
→
11/10 12:50, , 87F
11/10 12:50, 87F
→
11/10 12:52, , 88F
11/10 12:52, 88F
→
11/10 12:53, , 89F
11/10 12:53, 89F
→
11/10 12:55, , 90F
11/10 12:55, 90F
→
11/10 12:55, , 91F
11/10 12:55, 91F
推
11/10 13:11, , 92F
11/10 13:11, 92F
推
11/10 13:16, , 93F
11/10 13:16, 93F
→
11/10 13:21, , 94F
11/10 13:21, 94F
推
11/10 13:42, , 95F
11/10 13:42, 95F
→
11/10 13:43, , 96F
11/10 13:43, 96F
→
11/10 13:43, , 97F
11/10 13:43, 97F
推
11/10 13:55, , 98F
11/10 13:55, 98F
推
11/10 13:58, , 99F
11/10 13:58, 99F
噓
11/10 14:04, , 100F
11/10 14:04, 100F
→
11/10 14:30, , 101F
11/10 14:30, 101F
推
11/10 14:30, , 102F
11/10 14:30, 102F
→
11/10 16:49, , 103F
11/10 16:49, 103F
→
11/10 16:50, , 104F
11/10 16:50, 104F
推
11/10 19:10, , 105F
11/10 19:10, 105F
噓
11/10 19:49, , 106F
11/10 19:49, 106F
推
11/10 19:56, , 107F
11/10 19:56, 107F
推
11/10 20:14, , 108F
11/10 20:14, 108F
推
11/10 20:45, , 109F
11/10 20:45, 109F
推
11/10 21:53, , 110F
11/10 21:53, 110F
→
11/11 02:08, , 111F
11/11 02:08, 111F
推
11/11 06:20, , 112F
11/11 06:20, 112F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先)：
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇)：