[心得] 其實..很多車廠都依價格給安全配備已回收
有時看板上一些文章/推文 似乎認為某些車廠間給安全配備的策略不同
老實說...也沒那麼不同,他們都是按車價給安全配備的
我就來列一下(以置底文為來源資料)
某些價位不具備ESP的車款
[國產車]
TOYOTA: Vios, Yaris, Altis, Wish, Camry, RAV4
HONDA: Fit, City, Civic, CRV
Nissan: March, Bit Tiida, Livina, Super Sentra, Teana
Mitsubishi: ColtPlus, Lancer Fortis, Lancer iO, Outlander
Mazda: 5
Hyundai: Elantra EX, iX35
Luxgen: U6 Turbo, S5 Turbo, U7 Turbo, M7 Turbo
[進口車]
SUZUKI: Swift, SX4
Mazda: 2
Volkswagen: Polo, Vento
全車系具備ESP:
SUBARU: (全車系進口)最低價款82.9萬
FORD: 市售不論國產、進口均配備ESP。最低價款58.8萬
Kia: 依照置底整理文,均配備ESP。最低價款47.9萬
Skoda: (全車系進口)最低價款59.8萬
Peugeot: (全車系進口)最低價款79.8萬
Smart: (全車系進口)最低價款66.0萬
============================================================
該車款均配備ESP,但某些價位未達6SRS
[國產車]
FORD: Fiesta, Focus, Kuga
Hyundai: SantaFe
Kia: Morning
[進口車]
FORD: Juke
Skoda: Citigo
Smart: Fortwo
該車款均配備ESP & 6SRS:
很多...
(最低階就有ESP的車款,很多都是全部價位都給6SRS)
心得:
記得之前看板上一篇文談 Ford Focus,說到即使是Focus也是以價位做出區隔
並不是大放送 所有價位都給你6SRS
回來談板友常討論的和泰。你看上面,有那麼多的車款『某些價位不具備ESP』
如果你我是和泰的高層,要怎麼做決定?
「為了消費者的安全,決定各車款全價位都要有ESP」
當然,原本沒有ESP的車款變成有了之後,售價提高一些些是必然的
結果呢? 會不會發生這種情況:
「消費者跑去買另一廠沒有ESP的車,因為價格比較便宜...」
看銷售報告,如果Altis全價位放上ESP,會不會原本想買雅致版、經典版的
跑去買Sentra... 又不是傻了,銷售數量沒增加反而減少,然後減少的數量
跑到了對手廠「跟我們原本車型很像的車型」...
如果市場的風向就是這樣,理智的高層為什麼要拿磚頭砸自己腳呢?
jack852板友的話很有道理:
還是老話 消費者安全的意識要提升 法規要修改 不然無解
在2018年全部新車都要裝ESP的法令訂下後,其實我這篇只是過時的心得而已..:)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.32.2.214
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/car/M.1416323386.A.440.html
推
11/18 23:13, , 1F
11/18 23:13, 1F
推
11/18 23:14, , 2F
11/18 23:14, 2F
→
11/18 23:15, , 3F
11/18 23:15, 3F
→
11/18 23:17, , 4F
11/18 23:17, 4F
推
11/18 23:26, , 5F
11/18 23:26, 5F
推
11/18 23:27, , 6F
11/18 23:27, 6F
推
11/18 23:30, , 7F
11/18 23:30, 7F
→
11/18 23:33, , 8F
11/18 23:33, 8F
→
11/18 23:35, , 9F
11/18 23:35, 9F
→
11/18 23:36, , 10F
11/18 23:36, 10F
推
11/18 23:38, , 11F
11/18 23:38, 11F
→
11/18 23:39, , 12F
11/18 23:39, 12F
推
11/18 23:42, , 13F
11/18 23:42, 13F
推
11/18 23:53, , 14F
11/18 23:53, 14F
→
11/18 23:54, , 15F
11/18 23:54, 15F
推
11/18 23:55, , 16F
11/18 23:55, 16F
推
11/18 23:56, , 17F
11/18 23:56, 17F
推
11/19 00:04, , 18F
11/19 00:04, 18F
推
11/19 00:05, , 19F
11/19 00:05, 19F
推
11/19 00:06, , 20F
11/19 00:06, 20F
→
11/19 00:06, , 21F
11/19 00:06, 21F
→
11/19 00:06, , 22F
11/19 00:06, 22F
→
11/19 00:10, , 23F
11/19 00:10, 23F
→
11/19 00:10, , 24F
11/19 00:10, 24F
→
11/19 00:11, , 25F
11/19 00:11, 25F
→
11/19 00:11, , 26F
11/19 00:11, 26F
推
11/19 00:20, , 27F
11/19 00:20, 27F
推
11/19 00:55, , 28F
11/19 00:55, 28F
推
11/19 07:29, , 29F
11/19 07:29, 29F
→
11/19 07:29, , 30F
11/19 07:29, 30F
→
11/19 07:31, , 31F
11/19 07:31, 31F
推
11/19 07:53, , 32F
11/19 07:53, 32F
推
11/19 08:05, , 33F
11/19 08:05, 33F
→
11/19 08:43, , 34F
11/19 08:43, 34F
推
11/19 08:58, , 35F
11/19 08:58, 35F
推
11/19 09:12, , 36F
11/19 09:12, 36F
→
11/19 09:13, , 37F
11/19 09:13, 37F
→
11/19 09:14, , 38F
11/19 09:14, 38F
→
11/19 09:32, , 39F
11/19 09:32, 39F
推
11/19 10:39, , 40F
11/19 10:39, 40F
→
11/19 10:41, , 41F
11/19 10:41, 41F
→
11/19 10:43, , 42F
11/19 10:43, 42F
推
11/19 10:52, , 43F
11/19 10:52, 43F
→
11/19 10:53, , 44F
11/19 10:53, 44F
推
11/19 11:12, , 45F
11/19 11:12, 45F
推
11/19 12:24, , 46F
11/19 12:24, 46F
→
11/19 12:25, , 47F
11/19 12:25, 47F
推
11/19 12:29, , 48F
11/19 12:29, 48F
→
11/19 14:42, , 49F
11/19 14:42, 49F
→
11/19 14:42, , 50F
11/19 14:42, 50F
→
11/19 14:43, , 51F
11/19 14:43, 51F
噓
11/19 16:03, , 52F
11/19 16:03, 52F
→
11/19 16:04, , 53F
11/19 16:04, 53F
推
11/19 16:28, , 54F
11/19 16:28, 54F
→
11/19 16:29, , 55F
11/19 16:29, 55F
推
11/19 18:51, , 56F
11/19 18:51, 56F
推
11/19 20:31, , 57F
11/19 20:31, 57F
推
11/20 00:22, , 58F
11/20 00:22, 58F
推
11/20 22:11, , 59F
11/20 22:11, 59F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):