[討論] 林志傑真的沒有在NBA坐板凳的實力嗎
先別看標題急著噓
之前在SBL雖然很殺
但因為聯盟層級不高 所以不能代表什麼
但現在到CBA打球了
漸漸的有一些前NBA球員了
像Alston 馬大少 Bonzi Wells Smush Parker...等等
以同樣在CBA的成績比較
林志傑繳出的成績應該也不輸吧?
有些人其實在離開NBA時
好說歹說也至少還有替補實力吧
如果是不論"有沒有機會進NBA"
畢竟NBA能進去的人本來就是鳳毛麟角
也沒球隊會想特別去挖角龍套實力的球員
而是論"有沒有NBA板凳中的板凳的實力"
他有機會嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.173.161.68
推
04/03 12:20, , 1F
04/03 12:20, 1F
推
04/03 12:21, , 2F
04/03 12:21, 2F
推
04/03 12:25, , 3F
04/03 12:25, 3F
→
04/03 12:25, , 4F
04/03 12:25, 4F
→
04/03 12:30, , 5F
04/03 12:30, 5F
→
04/03 12:30, , 6F
04/03 12:30, 6F
推
04/03 12:34, , 7F
04/03 12:34, 7F
推
04/03 12:35, , 8F
04/03 12:35, 8F
→
04/03 12:45, , 9F
04/03 12:45, 9F
推
04/03 12:47, , 10F
04/03 12:47, 10F
→
04/03 12:48, , 11F
04/03 12:48, 11F
推
04/03 12:53, , 12F
04/03 12:53, 12F
推
04/03 13:02, , 13F
04/03 13:02, 13F
→
04/03 13:02, , 14F
04/03 13:02, 14F
→
04/03 13:09, , 15F
04/03 13:09, 15F
推
04/03 13:15, , 16F
04/03 13:15, 16F
推
04/03 13:21, , 17F
04/03 13:21, 17F
推
04/03 13:35, , 18F
04/03 13:35, 18F
推
04/03 13:43, , 19F
04/03 13:43, 19F
推
04/03 13:47, , 20F
04/03 13:47, 20F
推
04/03 13:55, , 21F
04/03 13:55, 21F
推
04/03 13:55, , 22F
04/03 13:55, 22F
→
04/03 14:06, , 23F
04/03 14:06, 23F
推
04/03 14:09, , 24F
04/03 14:09, 24F
推
04/03 14:10, , 25F
04/03 14:10, 25F
→
04/03 14:10, , 26F
04/03 14:10, 26F
推
04/03 14:20, , 27F
04/03 14:20, 27F
→
04/03 14:20, , 28F
04/03 14:20, 28F
推
04/03 14:37, , 29F
04/03 14:37, 29F
推
04/03 14:52, , 30F
04/03 14:52, 30F
推
04/03 14:53, , 31F
04/03 14:53, 31F
推
04/03 15:42, , 32F
04/03 15:42, 32F
推
04/03 15:52, , 33F
04/03 15:52, 33F
→
04/03 15:52, , 34F
04/03 15:52, 34F
→
04/03 15:52, , 35F
04/03 15:52, 35F
→
04/03 15:53, , 36F
04/03 15:53, 36F
推
04/03 16:24, , 37F
04/03 16:24, 37F
推
04/03 16:32, , 38F
04/03 16:32, 38F
推
04/03 17:01, , 39F
04/03 17:01, 39F
→
04/03 17:02, , 40F
04/03 17:02, 40F
→
04/03 17:02, , 41F
04/03 17:02, 41F
推
04/03 17:05, , 42F
04/03 17:05, 42F
→
04/03 17:06, , 43F
04/03 17:06, 43F
→
04/03 17:07, , 44F
04/03 17:07, 44F
→
04/03 17:07, , 45F
04/03 17:07, 45F
→
04/03 17:09, , 46F
04/03 17:09, 46F
→
04/03 17:10, , 47F
04/03 17:10, 47F
→
04/03 17:10, , 48F
04/03 17:10, 48F
推
04/03 17:14, , 49F
04/03 17:14, 49F
→
04/03 17:14, , 50F
04/03 17:14, 50F
推
04/03 17:26, , 51F
04/03 17:26, 51F
→
04/03 17:26, , 52F
04/03 17:26, 52F
推
04/03 18:33, , 53F
04/03 18:33, 53F
→
04/03 18:33, , 54F
04/03 18:33, 54F
→
04/03 18:53, , 55F
04/03 18:53, 55F
→
04/03 18:54, , 56F
04/03 18:54, 56F
→
04/03 18:54, , 57F
04/03 18:54, 57F
推
04/03 19:02, , 58F
04/03 19:02, 58F
→
04/03 19:04, , 59F
04/03 19:04, 59F
推
04/03 19:31, , 60F
04/03 19:31, 60F
推
04/03 20:16, , 61F
04/03 20:16, 61F
→
04/03 20:17, , 62F
04/03 20:17, 62F
→
04/03 20:18, , 63F
04/03 20:18, 63F
→
04/03 20:58, , 64F
04/03 20:58, 64F
推
04/03 22:20, , 65F
04/03 22:20, 65F
→
04/03 22:24, , 66F
04/03 22:24, 66F
推
04/03 23:54, , 67F
04/03 23:54, 67F
→
04/03 23:54, , 68F
04/03 23:54, 68F
推
04/04 07:45, , 69F
04/04 07:45, 69F
→
04/04 07:46, , 70F
04/04 07:46, 70F
→
04/04 07:47, , 71F
04/04 07:47, 71F
→
04/04 07:48, , 72F
04/04 07:48, 72F
→
04/04 07:50, , 73F
04/04 07:50, 73F
→
04/04 07:51, , 74F
04/04 07:51, 74F
→
04/04 07:52, , 75F
04/04 07:52, 75F
→
04/04 16:16, , 76F
04/04 16:16, 76F
→
04/06 14:50, , 77F
04/06 14:50, 77F
→
04/06 14:50, , 78F
04/06 14:50, 78F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):