[問題] 假如西班牙對上巴西!?
全世界都知道巴西的森巴式足球兼具
華麗球風及高超技巧兩項優點
傳球及控球能力也是頂尖
但小弟在看完"德西"和"荷西"大戰之後
深深覺得西班牙的控球及默契實在好得沒話說
不管是在中場 甚至全場, 球幾乎都在西班牙的腳下
尤其西德之戰更是只看到德國疲於奔命的追著球跑.....
這種情況在德英和德阿之戰都不曾見過@~@
荷蘭靠著"超積極"的防守對西班牙施壓及羅本的超人速度
才沒有陷入德國的窘境, 但還是在延長賽失守,敗下陣來
不禁想請教若"巴西"之戰打起來, 哪隊會比較有控球優勢啊??
會看到巴西和德國一樣整場追著球跑嗎@@~?
最後, 想幫荷蘭說點話, 除了延長賽下半場看到睡著...
最後被GOAL聲驚醒之外 整場比賽都有看
在"技不如人"(控球及默契)的情況下, 荷蘭想獲勝唯一的辦法
就是在防守上給西班牙施加心理壓力,不要重蹈德國的覆轍
讓西班牙輕鬆接球 帶球 傳球...再配合防守反擊或西班牙的失誤
例如羅本就有兩球單刀的機會, 這種策略其實是正確且合理的
任何一隊看到德國被電之後都會採取這種戰術
重點在於"尺度"的拿捏, 除了穿心腿(這真的應該給紅牌...)之外
大概也只有一兩球太跨張而已, 畢竟這是冠軍戰 打侵略性足球無可厚非
且高水準的比賽到最後本來就是在打肉搏戰
看過NBA季後賽的鄉民應該都很了解這點,
足球只是換種方式呈現罷了,
不過,本屆世足的整體實力西班牙的確是"名符其實"的第一名!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.25.136.31
→
07/13 12:29, , 1F
07/13 12:29, 1F
推
07/13 12:30, , 2F
07/13 12:30, 2F
推
07/13 12:30, , 3F
07/13 12:30, 3F
推
07/13 12:31, , 4F
07/13 12:31, 4F
推
07/13 12:31, , 5F
07/13 12:31, 5F
推
07/13 12:31, , 6F
07/13 12:31, 6F
推
07/13 12:31, , 7F
07/13 12:31, 7F
推
07/13 12:31, , 8F
07/13 12:31, 8F
→
07/13 12:31, , 9F
07/13 12:31, 9F
推
07/13 12:32, , 10F
07/13 12:32, 10F
→
07/13 12:32, , 11F
07/13 12:32, 11F
推
07/13 12:32, , 12F
07/13 12:32, 12F
→
07/13 12:33, , 13F
07/13 12:33, 13F
→
07/13 12:33, , 14F
07/13 12:33, 14F
→
07/13 12:33, , 15F
07/13 12:33, 15F
推
07/13 12:37, , 16F
07/13 12:37, 16F
→
07/13 12:38, , 17F
07/13 12:38, 17F
推
07/13 12:38, , 18F
07/13 12:38, 18F
→
07/13 12:38, , 19F
07/13 12:38, 19F
推
07/13 12:40, , 20F
07/13 12:40, 20F
推
07/13 12:44, , 21F
07/13 12:44, 21F
→
07/13 12:44, , 22F
07/13 12:44, 22F
→
07/13 12:48, , 23F
07/13 12:48, 23F
→
07/13 12:49, , 24F
07/13 12:49, 24F
推
07/13 12:50, , 25F
07/13 12:50, 25F
→
07/13 12:52, , 26F
07/13 12:52, 26F
→
07/13 12:53, , 27F
07/13 12:53, 27F
→
07/13 12:53, , 28F
07/13 12:53, 28F
→
07/13 12:54, , 29F
07/13 12:54, 29F
→
07/13 12:57, , 30F
07/13 12:57, 30F
推
07/13 12:57, , 31F
07/13 12:57, 31F
→
07/13 12:58, , 32F
07/13 12:58, 32F
→
07/13 12:59, , 33F
07/13 12:59, 33F
→
07/13 12:59, , 34F
07/13 12:59, 34F
→
07/13 13:00, , 35F
07/13 13:00, 35F
→
07/13 13:00, , 36F
07/13 13:00, 36F
→
07/13 13:01, , 37F
07/13 13:01, 37F
推
07/13 13:02, , 38F
07/13 13:02, 38F
→
07/13 13:03, , 39F
07/13 13:03, 39F
→
07/13 13:03, , 40F
07/13 13:03, 40F
→
07/13 13:04, , 41F
07/13 13:04, 41F
→
07/13 13:04, , 42F
07/13 13:04, 42F
推
07/13 13:06, , 43F
07/13 13:06, 43F
→
07/13 13:06, , 44F
07/13 13:06, 44F
→
07/13 13:07, , 45F
07/13 13:07, 45F
推
07/13 13:08, , 46F
07/13 13:08, 46F
→
07/13 13:09, , 47F
07/13 13:09, 47F
→
07/13 13:09, , 48F
07/13 13:09, 48F
→
07/13 13:10, , 49F
07/13 13:10, 49F
→
07/13 13:10, , 50F
07/13 13:10, 50F
→
07/13 13:11, , 51F
07/13 13:11, 51F
→
07/13 13:11, , 52F
07/13 13:11, 52F
→
07/13 13:12, , 53F
07/13 13:12, 53F
→
07/13 13:12, , 54F
07/13 13:12, 54F
→
07/13 13:13, , 55F
07/13 13:13, 55F
→
07/13 13:14, , 56F
07/13 13:14, 56F
→
07/13 13:16, , 57F
07/13 13:16, 57F
推
07/13 13:16, , 58F
07/13 13:16, 58F
→
07/13 13:17, , 59F
07/13 13:17, 59F
→
07/13 13:17, , 60F
07/13 13:17, 60F
→
07/13 13:17, , 61F
07/13 13:17, 61F
→
07/13 13:18, , 62F
07/13 13:18, 62F
→
07/13 13:19, , 63F
07/13 13:19, 63F
推
07/13 13:23, , 64F
07/13 13:23, 64F
→
07/13 13:25, , 65F
07/13 13:25, 65F
推
07/13 13:26, , 66F
07/13 13:26, 66F
→
07/13 13:28, , 67F
07/13 13:28, 67F
→
07/13 13:38, , 68F
07/13 13:38, 68F
→
07/13 13:38, , 69F
07/13 13:38, 69F
→
07/13 13:58, , 70F
07/13 13:58, 70F
→
07/13 14:00, , 71F
07/13 14:00, 71F
→
07/13 14:04, , 72F
07/13 14:04, 72F
→
07/13 14:04, , 73F
07/13 14:04, 73F
→
07/13 14:05, , 74F
07/13 14:05, 74F
推
07/13 14:05, , 75F
07/13 14:05, 75F
→
07/13 14:07, , 76F
07/13 14:07, 76F
→
07/13 14:09, , 77F
07/13 14:09, 77F
→
07/13 14:10, , 78F
07/13 14:10, 78F
推
07/13 14:20, , 79F
07/13 14:20, 79F
推
07/13 15:01, , 80F
07/13 15:01, 80F
→
07/13 15:02, , 81F
07/13 15:02, 81F
→
07/13 15:03, , 82F
07/13 15:03, 82F
→
07/13 15:17, , 83F
07/13 15:17, 83F
推
07/13 15:19, , 84F
07/13 15:19, 84F
噓
07/13 15:31, , 85F
07/13 15:31, 85F
推
07/13 15:31, , 86F
07/13 15:31, 86F
推
07/13 16:52, , 87F
07/13 16:52, 87F
→
07/13 16:52, , 88F
07/13 16:52, 88F
→
07/13 21:17, , 89F
07/13 21:17, 89F
討論串 (同標題文章)