[問題] 女性覺得要求不多,為何單身比例還是不低
看板WomenTalk作者jeromeshih (以謹慎態度來面對問題)時間6年前 (2017/07/12 12:48)推噓72(91推 19噓 193→)留言303則, 144人參與討論串1/12 (看更多)
大家都知道台灣未婚比率算是蠻高的
不過其實看許多女性的要求條件也不多,不過都找不到理想的另一半
一般開的的條件類似
1.陽光好聊,有眼緣
2.170-175以上,BMI正常
3.有穩定的職業以及安全感
附加的加分條件
i.不希望和父母同住
ii.家事男女平等應該一起做
iii.個性好的好男性
這時都還沒提到房&車&出國
覺得一般的條件不多,但似乎能滿足條件的是否也沒那麼多(畢竟如果兩邊契合交往和結婚比例就會提升)
因此目前算是下面哪一種狀況
a.一般條件即使很合理,找不到只是樣本不夠多,並非要求太高
b.女性可能高估自己市場價值,一般條件其實有點嚴苛
c.男女失衡在亞洲是趨勢,因此提高標準也是合理
d.外國人和本國人不同,標準可以再調整
是否有人可以說明一下
-----
Sent from JPTT on my Sony D6653.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.137.206.208
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WomenTalk/M.1499834907.A.9D2.html
→
07/12 12:49, , 1F
07/12 12:49, 1F
推
07/12 12:51, , 2F
07/12 12:51, 2F
→
07/12 12:51, , 3F
07/12 12:51, 3F
推
07/12 12:55, , 4F
07/12 12:55, 4F
→
07/12 12:56, , 5F
07/12 12:56, 5F
→
07/12 12:56, , 6F
07/12 12:56, 6F
噓
07/12 12:56, , 7F
07/12 12:56, 7F
→
07/12 12:56, , 8F
07/12 12:56, 8F
推
07/12 12:56, , 9F
07/12 12:56, 9F
→
07/12 12:57, , 10F
07/12 12:57, 10F
→
07/12 12:57, , 11F
07/12 12:57, 11F
→
07/12 12:57, , 12F
07/12 12:57, 12F
→
07/12 12:58, , 13F
07/12 12:58, 13F
推
07/12 12:58, , 14F
07/12 12:58, 14F
→
07/12 12:58, , 15F
07/12 12:58, 15F
推
07/12 12:58, , 16F
07/12 12:58, 16F
→
07/12 12:59, , 17F
07/12 12:59, 17F
→
07/12 12:59, , 18F
07/12 12:59, 18F
→
07/12 12:59, , 19F
07/12 12:59, 19F
→
07/12 13:00, , 20F
07/12 13:00, 20F
→
07/12 13:00, , 21F
07/12 13:00, 21F
→
07/12 13:00, , 22F
07/12 13:00, 22F
→
07/12 13:00, , 23F
07/12 13:00, 23F
→
07/12 13:02, , 24F
07/12 13:02, 24F
推
07/12 13:02, , 25F
07/12 13:02, 25F
推
07/12 13:03, , 26F
07/12 13:03, 26F
→
07/12 13:03, , 27F
07/12 13:03, 27F
→
07/12 13:03, , 28F
07/12 13:03, 28F
→
07/12 13:03, , 29F
07/12 13:03, 29F
→
07/12 13:03, , 30F
07/12 13:03, 30F
→
07/12 13:03, , 31F
07/12 13:03, 31F
→
07/12 13:03, , 32F
07/12 13:03, 32F
→
07/12 13:03, , 33F
07/12 13:03, 33F
→
07/12 13:03, , 34F
07/12 13:03, 34F
→
07/12 13:04, , 35F
07/12 13:04, 35F
推
07/12 13:05, , 36F
07/12 13:05, 36F
→
07/12 13:06, , 37F
07/12 13:06, 37F
噓
07/12 13:06, , 38F
07/12 13:06, 38F
→
07/12 13:06, , 39F
07/12 13:06, 39F
還有 224 則推文
→
07/12 21:53, , 264F
07/12 21:53, 264F
→
07/12 21:53, , 265F
07/12 21:53, 265F
推
07/12 21:53, , 266F
07/12 21:53, 266F
→
07/12 21:53, , 267F
07/12 21:53, 267F
→
07/12 21:54, , 268F
07/12 21:54, 268F
→
07/12 21:54, , 269F
07/12 21:54, 269F
→
07/12 21:55, , 270F
07/12 21:55, 270F
→
07/12 21:55, , 271F
07/12 21:55, 271F
→
07/12 21:56, , 272F
07/12 21:56, 272F
→
07/12 21:57, , 273F
07/12 21:57, 273F
→
07/12 21:58, , 274F
07/12 21:58, 274F
→
07/12 21:59, , 275F
07/12 21:59, 275F
噓
07/12 22:21, , 276F
07/12 22:21, 276F
推
07/12 22:27, , 277F
07/12 22:27, 277F
→
07/12 22:45, , 278F
07/12 22:45, 278F
噓
07/13 00:04, , 279F
07/13 00:04, 279F
噓
07/13 00:29, , 280F
07/13 00:29, 280F
→
07/13 00:29, , 281F
07/13 00:29, 281F
推
07/13 01:31, , 282F
07/13 01:31, 282F
→
07/13 01:31, , 283F
07/13 01:31, 283F
→
07/13 01:33, , 284F
07/13 01:33, 284F
→
07/13 01:33, , 285F
07/13 01:33, 285F
→
07/13 03:37, , 286F
07/13 03:37, 286F
→
07/13 04:54, , 287F
07/13 04:54, 287F
→
07/13 04:54, , 288F
07/13 04:54, 288F
→
07/13 04:54, , 289F
07/13 04:54, 289F
→
07/13 04:54, , 290F
07/13 04:54, 290F
→
07/13 09:07, , 291F
07/13 09:07, 291F
推
07/13 09:56, , 292F
07/13 09:56, 292F
→
07/13 11:46, , 293F
07/13 11:46, 293F
→
07/13 11:47, , 294F
07/13 11:47, 294F
→
07/13 11:49, , 295F
07/13 11:49, 295F
→
07/13 11:50, , 296F
07/13 11:50, 296F
→
07/13 11:51, , 297F
07/13 11:51, 297F
→
07/13 11:53, , 298F
07/13 11:53, 298F
→
07/13 11:54, , 299F
07/13 11:54, 299F
推
07/13 12:20, , 300F
07/13 12:20, 300F
→
07/13 12:20, , 301F
07/13 12:20, 301F
→
07/15 09:40, , 302F
07/15 09:40, 302F
→
07/15 09:43, , 303F
07/15 09:43, 303F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 12 篇):