[新聞] 低收入戶不能染髮? 女大生傷心回文已回收
蘋果即時
http://m.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/hot/20160922/953594/
低收入戶不能染髮? 女大生傷心回文
人難免都有些刻板印象,但印象未必為真、為實!
女大生就讀大三,她是位低收入戶,卻在學校辦理補助手續時被老師狠狠洗臉,她將經歷
po至《dcard》感嘆「難道我是低收的孩子,我就要每天穿得破破爛爛、樸樸素素的上學
嗎?難道我是清寒的孩子,我就沒有資格打扮自己嗎?」
女大生說當天她在申請時,一旁的老師(非承辦人)看到她有染髮,即連珠砲的追問「同學
,你穿得這麼漂亮還來申請補助喔」、「你的錢是都花去哪裡呀?都拿去染頭髮買衣服是
不是?」、「你穿成這樣,你覺得被贊助補助的委員看到他們會不會不開心?」、「我要
去問一下你們老師,為什麼這樣還能申請補助?」
女大生說,當下,她有解釋染髮是學美髮的朋友贊助的,沒花錢,但那位老師還是沒停止
,讓她心裡覺得很受傷「穿100元的素T,250元的牛仔褲,夜市100元拖鞋,戴朋友的鴨舌
帽,朋友送的牛仔外套,全身不超過500的金額,卻被這樣酸的感覺真的很難受!」
其他網友看到後回文「原po一定是顏值高」、「人美就100元的衣服穿的像1萬元的」;這
篇也引起很多同為低收的回文「我小時候營養午餐費是0元,同學就會就會瘋狂問為什麼
?有時候善意也需要包裝,如果給出需要的東西卻刺痛了當事人的心,那比沒有給更糟糕
」、「我也曾經體會過…親戚朋友送我東西,難道因為我是政府認定的窮不該用?」、「
每次買化妝品衣服鞋子啦,別人就會用一種
不是該存起來嗎?奇怪,我吃的少,有剩餘的錢不能打扮喔」
心得:
不知道大家對這篇的想法是如何呢?
好像確實每一則時事新聞
都有值得我們省思和探討的面向
就看大家是從什麼角度去切入了
但是先入為主的觀念
似乎是大家無可避免的
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 27.247.103.227
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WomenTalk/M.1474522585.A.871.html
噓
09/22 13:39, , 1F
09/22 13:39, 1F
推
09/22 13:39, , 2F
09/22 13:39, 2F
→
09/22 13:39, , 3F
09/22 13:39, 3F
→
09/22 13:40, , 4F
09/22 13:40, 4F
推
09/22 13:40, , 5F
09/22 13:40, 5F
→
09/22 13:40, , 6F
09/22 13:40, 6F
→
09/22 13:41, , 7F
09/22 13:41, 7F
→
09/22 13:41, , 8F
09/22 13:41, 8F
推
09/22 13:41, , 9F
09/22 13:41, 9F
→
09/22 13:42, , 10F
09/22 13:42, 10F
→
09/22 13:42, , 11F
09/22 13:42, 11F
→
09/22 13:42, , 12F
09/22 13:42, 12F
推
09/22 13:43, , 13F
09/22 13:43, 13F
推
09/22 13:43, , 14F
09/22 13:43, 14F
→
09/22 13:43, , 15F
09/22 13:43, 15F
→
09/22 13:43, , 16F
09/22 13:43, 16F
→
09/22 13:43, , 17F
09/22 13:43, 17F
推
09/22 13:45, , 18F
09/22 13:45, 18F
推
09/22 13:45, , 19F
09/22 13:45, 19F
推
09/22 13:46, , 20F
09/22 13:46, 20F
推
09/22 13:46, , 21F
09/22 13:46, 21F
→
09/22 13:46, , 22F
09/22 13:46, 22F
→
09/22 13:46, , 23F
09/22 13:46, 23F
→
09/22 13:46, , 24F
09/22 13:46, 24F
→
09/22 13:47, , 25F
09/22 13:47, 25F
→
09/22 13:47, , 26F
09/22 13:47, 26F
→
09/22 13:48, , 27F
09/22 13:48, 27F
→
09/22 13:48, , 28F
09/22 13:48, 28F
→
09/22 13:48, , 29F
09/22 13:48, 29F
推
09/22 13:49, , 30F
09/22 13:49, 30F
→
09/22 13:49, , 31F
09/22 13:49, 31F
→
09/22 13:49, , 32F
09/22 13:49, 32F
→
09/22 13:49, , 33F
09/22 13:49, 33F
→
09/22 13:49, , 34F
09/22 13:49, 34F
→
09/22 13:49, , 35F
09/22 13:49, 35F
推
09/22 13:50, , 36F
09/22 13:50, 36F
→
09/22 13:50, , 37F
09/22 13:50, 37F
→
09/22 13:50, , 38F
09/22 13:50, 38F
推
09/22 13:51, , 39F
09/22 13:51, 39F
還有 196 則推文
→
09/22 19:30, , 236F
09/22 19:30, 236F
推
09/22 19:34, , 237F
09/22 19:34, 237F
→
09/22 19:34, , 238F
09/22 19:34, 238F
→
09/22 19:34, , 239F
09/22 19:34, 239F
噓
09/22 19:34, , 240F
09/22 19:34, 240F
噓
09/22 19:35, , 241F
09/22 19:35, 241F
推
09/22 19:36, , 242F
09/22 19:36, 242F
→
09/22 19:36, , 243F
09/22 19:36, 243F
→
09/22 19:40, , 244F
09/22 19:40, 244F
→
09/22 19:42, , 245F
09/22 19:42, 245F
噓
09/22 19:49, , 246F
09/22 19:49, 246F
→
09/22 19:49, , 247F
09/22 19:49, 247F
→
09/22 19:49, , 248F
09/22 19:49, 248F
→
09/22 19:49, , 249F
09/22 19:49, 249F
→
09/22 20:03, , 250F
09/22 20:03, 250F
推
09/22 20:03, , 251F
09/22 20:03, 251F
→
09/22 20:03, , 252F
09/22 20:03, 252F
噓
09/22 20:16, , 253F
09/22 20:16, 253F
推
09/22 20:21, , 254F
09/22 20:21, 254F
→
09/22 20:23, , 255F
09/22 20:23, 255F
→
09/22 20:31, , 256F
09/22 20:31, 256F
→
09/22 20:32, , 257F
09/22 20:32, 257F
噓
09/22 20:58, , 258F
09/22 20:58, 258F
推
09/22 21:28, , 259F
09/22 21:28, 259F
推
09/22 21:44, , 260F
09/22 21:44, 260F
→
09/22 21:44, , 261F
09/22 21:44, 261F
推
09/22 21:47, , 262F
09/22 21:47, 262F
→
09/22 21:51, , 263F
09/22 21:51, 263F
推
09/22 22:20, , 264F
09/22 22:20, 264F
推
09/23 00:11, , 265F
09/23 00:11, 265F
→
09/23 00:11, , 266F
09/23 00:11, 266F
噓
09/23 00:29, , 267F
09/23 00:29, 267F
推
09/23 03:42, , 268F
09/23 03:42, 268F
推
09/23 10:51, , 269F
09/23 10:51, 269F
推
09/23 12:02, , 270F
09/23 12:02, 270F
推
09/23 12:59, , 271F
09/23 12:59, 271F
→
09/23 12:59, , 272F
09/23 12:59, 272F
→
09/23 13:00, , 273F
09/23 13:00, 273F
噓
09/23 13:32, , 274F
09/23 13:32, 274F
噓
09/23 14:12, , 275F
09/23 14:12, 275F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):