[問題] 女孩們覺得,要什麼條件才願意生小孩已回收
台灣近年生育率全球最低
很多人說,因為養不起小孩
不能給小孩好的生活品質的話,不如不要生
有些人覺得,不生小孩的話
夫妻雙薪,可以過很好的生活
可以每年出國,可以常常買想要的東西、吃大餐
要能夠給小孩很好的生活品質,又要能兼顧夫妻的物質需求
對多數人來說確實是很有挑戰性的事情
那麼,到底什麼樣的標準,才是能生小孩的門檻呢?
假設以台北為例,30歲的夫妻雙薪十萬敢生嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.24.33.204
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WomenTalk/M.1471769065.A.D8E.html
推
08/21 16:46, , 1F
08/21 16:46, 1F
推
08/21 16:46, , 2F
08/21 16:46, 2F
推
08/21 16:48, , 3F
08/21 16:48, 3F
推
08/21 16:48, , 4F
08/21 16:48, 4F
推
08/21 16:49, , 5F
08/21 16:49, 5F
→
08/21 16:49, , 6F
08/21 16:49, 6F
推
08/21 16:49, , 7F
08/21 16:49, 7F
→
08/21 16:51, , 8F
08/21 16:51, 8F
→
08/21 16:51, , 9F
08/21 16:51, 9F
推
08/21 16:56, , 10F
08/21 16:56, 10F
推
08/21 16:57, , 11F
08/21 16:57, 11F
→
08/21 16:57, , 12F
08/21 16:57, 12F
看板上常有人批評這心態耶,覺得不能給小孩好的生活的話
只會造成階級複製,很不負責任
所以我才好奇有沒有比較明確的標準或是門檻
推
08/21 17:00, , 13F
08/21 17:00, 13F
→
08/21 17:00, , 14F
08/21 17:00, 14F
→
08/21 17:01, , 15F
08/21 17:01, 15F
→
08/21 17:01, , 16F
08/21 17:01, 16F
→
08/21 17:01, , 17F
08/21 17:01, 17F
推
08/21 17:02, , 18F
08/21 17:02, 18F
→
08/21 17:02, , 19F
08/21 17:02, 19F
→
08/21 17:03, , 20F
08/21 17:03, 20F
→
08/21 17:03, , 21F
08/21 17:03, 21F
→
08/21 17:03, , 22F
08/21 17:03, 22F
推
08/21 17:03, , 23F
08/21 17:03, 23F
→
08/21 17:03, , 24F
08/21 17:03, 24F
→
08/21 17:04, , 25F
08/21 17:04, 25F
推
08/21 17:04, , 26F
08/21 17:04, 26F
推
08/21 17:05, , 27F
08/21 17:05, 27F
推
08/21 17:06, , 28F
08/21 17:06, 28F
→
08/21 17:06, , 29F
08/21 17:06, 29F
→
08/21 17:08, , 30F
08/21 17:08, 30F
推
08/21 17:10, , 31F
08/21 17:10, 31F
→
08/21 17:10, , 32F
08/21 17:10, 32F
民國49年,生育率5.75
民國69年,生育率2.52
最近大概都是1左右吧,所以未必和經濟起飛絕對相關吧?
個人覺得應該是對於物質生活的追求提升很多。
→
08/21 17:13, , 33F
08/21 17:13, 33F
→
08/21 17:17, , 34F
08/21 17:17, 34F
那請問什麼條件才不算是亂養,標準是什麼?
推
08/21 17:17, , 35F
08/21 17:17, 35F
推
08/21 17:18, , 36F
08/21 17:18, 36F
還有 220 則推文
還有 9 段內文
→
08/21 23:46, , 257F
08/21 23:46, 257F
→
08/21 23:46, , 258F
08/21 23:46, 258F
→
08/21 23:46, , 259F
08/21 23:46, 259F
→
08/21 23:49, , 260F
08/21 23:49, 260F
→
08/21 23:51, , 261F
08/21 23:51, 261F
推
08/21 23:53, , 262F
08/21 23:53, 262F
推
08/21 23:57, , 263F
08/21 23:57, 263F
推
08/22 00:12, , 264F
08/22 00:12, 264F
→
08/22 00:14, , 265F
08/22 00:14, 265F
推
08/22 00:32, , 266F
08/22 00:32, 266F
→
08/22 00:32, , 267F
08/22 00:32, 267F
→
08/22 00:32, , 268F
08/22 00:32, 268F
→
08/22 00:32, , 269F
08/22 00:32, 269F
推
08/22 01:10, , 270F
08/22 01:10, 270F
推
08/22 01:27, , 271F
08/22 01:27, 271F
→
08/22 01:27, , 272F
08/22 01:27, 272F
推
08/22 01:42, , 273F
08/22 01:42, 273F
推
08/22 02:10, , 274F
08/22 02:10, 274F
推
08/22 02:55, , 275F
08/22 02:55, 275F
噓
08/22 03:11, , 276F
08/22 03:11, 276F
噓
08/22 03:23, , 277F
08/22 03:23, 277F
推
08/22 05:42, , 278F
08/22 05:42, 278F
推
08/22 07:07, , 279F
08/22 07:07, 279F
推
08/22 08:17, , 280F
08/22 08:17, 280F
→
08/22 08:17, , 281F
08/22 08:17, 281F
推
08/22 09:15, , 282F
08/22 09:15, 282F
推
08/22 09:29, , 283F
08/22 09:29, 283F
→
08/22 09:29, , 284F
08/22 09:29, 284F
推
08/22 10:11, , 285F
08/22 10:11, 285F
→
08/22 10:12, , 286F
08/22 10:12, 286F
→
08/22 10:44, , 287F
08/22 10:44, 287F
推
08/22 10:54, , 288F
08/22 10:54, 288F
噓
08/22 11:06, , 289F
08/22 11:06, 289F
推
08/22 12:38, , 290F
08/22 12:38, 290F
推
08/22 13:05, , 291F
08/22 13:05, 291F
推
08/22 15:38, , 292F
08/22 15:38, 292F
推
08/22 21:50, , 293F
08/22 21:50, 293F
→
08/22 21:50, , 294F
08/22 21:50, 294F
→
08/24 11:41, , 295F
08/24 11:41, 295F
→
08/24 11:42, , 296F
08/24 11:42, 296F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):