[討論] 微軟“去Nokia化”後的第一槍:打向低端
看板WindowsPhone作者ReitaHey (ReitaHey)時間11年前 (2014/11/09 13:56)推噓43(45推 2噓 198→)留言245則, 34人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)
"微軟今年的手機產品線細分讓人看得著實有點眼花繚亂,不過如果你能理解以下這句話的話,一定能看懂微軟的套路:一線品牌做生態,二線品牌拼覆蓋。
當然這並不是說微軟就不是一線品牌,而是繼承了Nokia產品線覆蓋戰略的微軟,暫時還沒能夠在所有自家推出的 Windows Phone 找到那麼一個爆款。因此,對於今年已經發佈過 Lumia 930、Lumia 830 兩款旗艦手機的微軟來說,用覆蓋產品線的做法來拼市場份額的每一個百分點,看來還是更可取一些。"
原文:http://ppt.cc/C4A7
-------------------------------------
心得:反正只會有一些人搞不清楚狀況就說"燃燒的平台2"或者"不離不棄,被當北七"
假設今年底出旗艦機假日銷售期一定會被iPhone 6壓著打,所以年底賣低端衝市占率才是正確的
喔對,微軟壓根沒買下Nokia的所有,只買了裝置與服務部門
而且Nokia給的品牌授權也只有一年,為什麼要幫別人養品牌
有些人也只會看台媒文章來酸微軟而已
--
Sent from my Windows
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 119.14.132.193
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WindowsPhone/M.1415512604.A.F71.html
推
11/09 14:07, , 1F
11/09 14:07, 1F
推
11/09 14:10, , 2F
11/09 14:10, 2F
→
11/09 14:10, , 3F
11/09 14:10, 3F
→
11/09 14:12, , 4F
11/09 14:12, 4F
推
11/09 14:15, , 5F
11/09 14:15, 5F
推
11/09 14:16, , 6F
11/09 14:16, 6F
→
11/09 14:18, , 7F
11/09 14:18, 7F
→
11/09 14:18, , 8F
11/09 14:18, 8F
→
11/09 14:19, , 9F
11/09 14:19, 9F
→
11/09 14:19, , 10F
11/09 14:19, 10F
推
11/09 14:37, , 11F
11/09 14:37, 11F
→
11/09 14:39, , 12F
11/09 14:39, 12F
→
11/09 14:39, , 13F
11/09 14:39, 13F
推
11/09 14:41, , 14F
11/09 14:41, 14F
→
11/09 14:41, , 15F
11/09 14:41, 15F
推
11/09 14:42, , 16F
11/09 14:42, 16F
→
11/09 14:42, , 17F
11/09 14:42, 17F
推
11/09 14:48, , 18F
11/09 14:48, 18F
→
11/09 14:48, , 19F
11/09 14:48, 19F
→
11/09 14:51, , 20F
11/09 14:51, 20F
→
11/09 14:59, , 21F
11/09 14:59, 21F
推
11/09 15:00, , 22F
11/09 15:00, 22F
推
11/09 15:01, , 23F
11/09 15:01, 23F
→
11/09 15:01, , 24F
11/09 15:01, 24F
→
11/09 15:02, , 25F
11/09 15:02, 25F
→
11/09 15:03, , 26F
11/09 15:03, 26F
→
11/09 15:03, , 27F
11/09 15:03, 27F
→
11/09 15:04, , 28F
11/09 15:04, 28F
推
11/09 15:08, , 29F
11/09 15:08, 29F
→
11/09 15:09, , 30F
11/09 15:09, 30F
噓
11/09 15:17, , 31F
11/09 15:17, 31F
推
11/09 15:19, , 32F
11/09 15:19, 32F
→
11/09 15:19, , 33F
11/09 15:19, 33F
推
11/09 15:21, , 34F
11/09 15:21, 34F
→
11/09 15:22, , 35F
11/09 15:22, 35F
→
11/09 15:22, , 36F
11/09 15:22, 36F
→
11/09 15:22, , 37F
11/09 15:22, 37F
→
11/09 15:24, , 38F
11/09 15:24, 38F
→
11/09 15:24, , 39F
11/09 15:24, 39F
還有 166 則推文
→
11/09 19:05, , 206F
11/09 19:05, 206F
→
11/09 19:06, , 207F
11/09 19:06, 207F
→
11/09 19:07, , 208F
11/09 19:07, 208F
→
11/09 19:14, , 209F
11/09 19:14, 209F
推
11/09 19:39, , 210F
11/09 19:39, 210F
→
11/09 19:40, , 211F
11/09 19:40, 211F
→
11/09 19:41, , 212F
11/09 19:41, 212F
→
11/09 19:41, , 213F
11/09 19:41, 213F
推
11/09 20:09, , 214F
11/09 20:09, 214F
→
11/09 20:09, , 215F
11/09 20:09, 215F
推
11/09 20:27, , 216F
11/09 20:27, 216F
→
11/09 20:28, , 217F
11/09 20:28, 217F
→
11/09 20:28, , 218F
11/09 20:28, 218F
→
11/09 20:29, , 219F
11/09 20:29, 219F
→
11/09 20:29, , 220F
11/09 20:29, 220F
推
11/09 21:09, , 221F
11/09 21:09, 221F
推
11/09 21:12, , 222F
11/09 21:12, 222F
推
11/09 21:17, , 223F
11/09 21:17, 223F
→
11/09 21:18, , 224F
11/09 21:18, 224F
→
11/09 21:18, , 225F
11/09 21:18, 225F
→
11/09 21:19, , 226F
11/09 21:19, 226F
→
11/09 21:21, , 227F
11/09 21:21, 227F
推
11/09 21:25, , 228F
11/09 21:25, 228F
→
11/09 21:25, , 229F
11/09 21:25, 229F
→
11/09 21:27, , 230F
11/09 21:27, 230F
推
11/10 01:41, , 231F
11/10 01:41, 231F
→
11/10 01:42, , 232F
11/10 01:42, 232F
→
11/10 01:42, , 233F
11/10 01:42, 233F
→
11/10 01:43, , 234F
11/10 01:43, 234F
→
11/10 01:44, , 235F
11/10 01:44, 235F
→
11/10 01:46, , 236F
11/10 01:46, 236F
推
11/10 01:51, , 237F
11/10 01:51, 237F
→
11/10 01:51, , 238F
11/10 01:51, 238F
→
11/10 02:14, , 239F
11/10 02:14, 239F
推
11/10 03:17, , 240F
11/10 03:17, 240F
→
11/10 03:18, , 241F
11/10 03:18, 241F
→
11/10 03:18, , 242F
11/10 03:18, 242F
推
11/10 03:29, , 243F
11/10 03:29, 243F
推
11/10 12:51, , 244F
11/10 12:51, 244F
→
11/10 17:13, , 245F
11/10 17:13, 245F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):