[情報] Yuri Pasholok Q&A

看板Wargaming作者tai33ru (磁磚大)時間8年前 (2015/11/03 02:28)推噓27(27推 0噓 8→)

留言35則, 21人參與討論串2/2 (看更多)

無意間發現的另一個經營WG／WT／AW等遊戲的網站這份Q&A在Status Report上也有，但是這裡的提問脈絡比較清楚這次翻翻看這個，大家可以比較看看有沒有不同 Translated by Alex. Thanks! Q: What can you tell us about the M4/FL10 and Waffentrager Leopard? Is it possible to introduce them in to the game? A: The M4/FL10 is being looked at as a potential candidate to be introduced, there are no problems with the machine, but the main question is where do we put it? There is no certainty about an Arabian crew. Regarding the Waffentrager Leopard, this machine never existed. There was a 105mm SPG project based on it and work got to a full size wooden mock up, but our feelings towards premium artillery aren’t enthusiastic. There are also real projects that reached the prototyping stages. Q：說說看搭載FL-10（AMX-13砲塔）的M4還有WT-Leopard的消息，他們有可能加入遊戲中嗎？ A：前者有作為潛在候選車推出的機會，車輛本身沒有問題，但要把它放在哪才是問題，而目前沒有推出阿拉伯組員的可能。而再看WT-Leo，這台車根本不存在，是有一個搭載105mm的自走砲計畫，並進展到1:1木製模型的階段。但我們並不想推出金幣 SPG，其他可能候選則也還有一些已經有原型車階段的計畫。 M4/FL-10：http://wot-news.com/uploads/img/112015/pa_1.jpg

Q: Is there a possibility of a super-heavy tank branch for the Soviets, like the Japanese? Like the T-39 or T-100Z? A: A super-heavy branch is unlikely, but a heavy branch has some possibilities. Q：蘇聯還有機會向日本線一樣推出超重坦線嗎？把T-39或T-100Z搞出來之類的？ A：超重坦線沒甚麼指望，但一般重坦線還有可能性。 Q: Did the T-34-85 ever carry a 100mm gun historically? A: Yes, in 1945 they managed to fit a 100mm gun in the T-34-85 turret, but the design struggled. Q：T-34/85在史實上有搭載過100mm炮嗎？ A：有，1945年曾將100炮弄到T-34/85的砲塔，但設計案最後廢棄了。 Q: How many hulls did the T-44 have, and which was the most armoured? A: Minimum 3. The hull that was put in to serial production was the most protected. Q：T-44到底有幾個車體設計？哪一個裝甲最好？ A：最少有三個，最後投入量產的就是裝甲最好的。 Q: Were there any tank destroyers based on the T-28 chassis? A: No, by the end of the ’30s the T-28 was obsolete. Q：有任何TD是基於T-28設計的嗎？ A：都沒有，30年代末期T-28就已經過時了。 Q: Were there any projects on the KV chassis other than the KV-7 and SU-152? A: My favourite, the U-19 armed with the 203mm B-4. Otherwise I wrote a whole book about them. Q：那麼基於KV底盤，除了KV-7以及SU-152的TD呢？ A：不得不提我的最愛：U-19，搭載了B-4 203炮的玩意兒，我有寫一本關於他們譜系的書。（譯更正：U-19並非wiki上所述的是S-51） U-19：http://wot-news.com/uploads/img/112015/pa_3a.jpg

Q: Did any research projects exist that used the M-34 aircraft engine? A: T-100 and SMK. Q：有任何研究計畫使用到M-34航空引擎的嗎？ A：T-100跟SMK。 T-100圖：http://wot-news.com/uploads/img/112015/pa_4a.jpg

SMK圖：http://wot-news.com/uploads/img/112015/pa_4b.jpg

Q: Does the in-game IS-6 have a historical top speed? A: This question goes to the balance department! Q：遊戲中IS-6的速度是符合史實的嗎？ A：這個問題你得問平衡部門！ Q: What do you think about an E-25 with a 88mm gun? A: The hamster will burst. (In other words, fake/not possible) Q：E-25搭載一門88炮的話你怎麼看？ A：不可能的。（譯：前面不會翻...留著原文大家意會就好） Q: Where did the Grille 15 come from, didn’t the schematics show us something resembling a GW Panther? A: In reality, the name GW Panther is provisional, some of the variants on that chassis were named like the Grille 15. The GW Tiger was called Grille 17. Q：Grille 15這台車怎麼來的？之前沒有像是GWP一樣的相關的示意圖釋出啊？ A：講真的，GW豹是暫時名稱，該衍生型相關的命名是叫做Grille 15，而GW虎則是稱作Grille 17。 Q: Are there any machines left to add new MT branches to existing nations? A: There are some possibilities but not Soviet. Q：有任何可能的中坦線能夠加到現存的國家線裡嗎？ A：有一些可能性但蘇聯沒有。 Q: Are there any machines left to add new LT branches to existing nations? A: There are also some possibilities but it’s too early to tell. Q：（承上）那麼輕坦呢？ A：也有一些可能但現在要談還太早。 Q: In Company of Heros 2, the ISU-152 has concrete-piercing rounds. In WoT they’re called armour-piercing, or does it have both types of rounds? A: A general greeting to the CoH consultants, that’s all I can say. The armour-piercing rounds for the ML-20S were developed in 1943 and that’s when they went in to service. Q：在COH2中，ISU-152配了「碉堡剋星」彈藥，在WOT中他被稱為穿甲彈，還是說這是兩種不同的彈藥？ A：幫我向COH的顧問問好，就這樣。ML-20S主炮的穿甲彈是在1943年開發並在同年發配使用。 Q: What are your comments on the fact that, in-game, the SP. IC has a mass of 9+ton, but IRL, it has a mass of less than 7ton? A: …And again the question goes to the balance department! Q：你對於SPIC在遊戲中重逾九噸，但在現實中他竟少於七噸這件事情有什麼要說的？ A：...老話一句，問平衡部門去。 Q: What is the most unusual super-heavy tank project you’ve seen? What country did it come from, and do we need such machine in the game? A: In Kazakhstan there was a proposal for a 14,000 ton vibro-tank (it moved using vibration), made of steel reinforced concrete. Are you sure you need this in Randoms? Q：有甚麼超重坦計畫是你們看過最特別的？從哪來的？在遊戲中推出可能嗎？ A：在哈薩克有一個14,000噸的諧振運動型車輛計畫，由鋼筋混凝土構成，你確定你想要在隨機戰鬥中看到這玩意兒...？（譯：圖在下方留言區） Q: Why does the T-34s ZiS-2 have 112mm of penetration, measured at 90 degrees, but the Pz.Kpfw. IIIs KwK39/L60 have 67mm of penetration, measured at 30 degrees? Because at 90 degrees and 100 meters the KwK39 L/60 should have 90-98mm of penetration. What are the reasons for using penetration measurements taken at different angles? A: Again, the question goes to the balance department. Q：為什麼T-34家族的ZiS-2（57mm）在90度下有112mm穿深，但三號的KwK 39（5cm）在30度下卻是67mm，換算下來90度、100公尺距離下的KwK 39應該有90-98mm的穿深，所以使用不同角度出來的穿深數據來套用的理由是？ A：還是一樣，去問平衡部門。 Q: What can you say about the replacement of the FV215b? How is the Super Conqueror better or worse than the Chieftain? A: For example, the Chieftain isn’t classified as a heavy tank. Q：對於FV215b取代案你的看法是？超級征服者跟酋長比起來孰好孰爛？ A：這樣說，酋長的分類並不是重坦喔！（譯：意思是不能比啦。） Q: Is there enough tanks for an alternative MT branch for the Americans? The Patton III is a great tank but a bit of a barn. Is there anything smaller? A: There aren’t enough tanks. Q：美國中坦線有足夠的替代車嗎？M48巴頓是不錯啦但有點太肥，有其他更小台的嗎？ A：車輛不足，謝謝指教。 Q: Is the T-84 concept by P.P. Vasilyev a fake or were there schematics? In my opinion it seems like it would fit as a replacement for the Obj. 430 since the concept continues the branch (rear turret MT). A: I don’t think it will pull up to a tier 10. What for anyway? Q：T-84 Concept是假的還是有圖紙？在我看來她好像能夠成為Object.430的替代車，而且能夠延續這條線的特色（砲塔後置）。 A：我不認為他能夠被拉到十階去，而且為什麼要這麼做呢？ T-84 1949圖：http://wot-news.com/uploads/img/112015/pa_6.jpg

Q: Is the game model of the T110E5 historical? Because on the schematics the front plates were flat and highly angled, but in-game they are rounded, and there was a different gun mantlet. A: What’s historical about paper drawings and a mock up? To be honest, I wouldn’t want to get in to a discussion about the historicity of the whole concept. Q：遊戲中的T110E5模型符合史實嗎？在圖紙上前裝甲看起來很平而且角度很大，然而遊戲中它比較圓，而且炮盾也長的不一樣。 A：你對圖紙跟模型要求什麼史實？我實在不想要開啟有關這個關於「史實與否」的話題。 Q: In your livejournal you mentioned that the T110 project had near 10 variants, we only have 3 in-game. Is the introduction of the rest a reality, as alternatives or separate branches from tier 8? A: There’s no sense in doing that. Q：在你的日誌中曾提到T110計畫有將近10種衍生型，遊戲中只有三種，其他衍生型有可能成為若干條從T8接續的線嗎？ A：沒必要。 Q: You’ve talked before about replacing the T28 at tier 8, because technically the tier 8 and 9 are the same machine. What projects are there to replace it, since the T28 HTC is already in the game? A: We’ve found and counted up 6 variants of the T28/T95. Q：你曾經提過有關T28的取代可能，因為T8跟T9本質上是同台車，但T28 HTC已經在遊戲裡了，那麼會是用甚麼計畫去取代它呢？ A：我們已經找到超過6個T28/T95的衍生型。 Q: The British have development concepts for 3 tank series, FV300 (light), FV200 (medium-heavy) and FV100 (super-heavy). What is known about 300 and 100 series projects? We only have one 300 series project (an arty) and no 100 series projects. A: We are thinking about 300 series. Nothing about 100s at the moment. Q：英國發展了大約三個系列的車輛概念：FV300輕坦計畫、FV200中重坦計畫與FV100 超重坦計畫，那麼有關FV300跟FV100的計畫是什麼？我們目前只有一台300計畫而沒有任何100計畫的車。 A：我們有在考慮300計畫，100計畫目前則無。 Q: What is your personal opinion about the T-14 Armata? A: If it going into serial production then we will have something to talk about, nothing to talk about for now. And yeah, Norinco knows the sense in crew hatches, I saw myself in Paris. Q：你個人對T-14阿瑪塔有什麼評論？ A：如果他進入量產階段那就有比較多可以討論的，現在則沒辦法說什麼。而肯定的是中國北方工業知道成員艙的秘密，而我自己在巴黎有看到。 Q: There have been mentions of mounting a BL-10 in an IS-7, is this truth or a fake concept? A: Not BL-10 152mm but BL-13 122mm, and also there was an Obj. 705A with a M51 152mm gun. Q：曾經有多個消息提到IS-7裝配BL-10，這個說法是真的還假的？ A：是BL-13而非BL-10，同時也還有個Object.705A計畫裝的是M51 152mm主炮。 IS-7裝BL-13圖：http://wot-news.com/uploads/img/112015/pa_7.jpg

似乎可理解成IS-7後置砲塔型 M51 152mm在Obj.705A上的圖：http://wot-news.com/uploads/img/112015/pa_7a.jpg

Q: Were there real plans to mount a 10.5cm Pak L/52 on the JagdPanther? A: That was a balance decision. Q：確實有獵豹上裝105mm L/52的計畫嗎？ A：這是為了平衡的考量。 Q: Which classes of tanks could we expect, apart from MTs, in the Czechoslovakian tree? A: Apart from HTs, the other classes fill up adequately. Q：除了中坦外，我們還可以期待有哪些車輛加入捷克斯洛伐克線？ A：除了重坦之外的都能夠完整加入。 Q: Is it legal to give the 150mm gun of the Grille 15 an accuracy of 0.268? It works out to the caliber of the round is 1.5 times smaller than the spread of the weapon, and how was such a powerful and heavy gun stabilised? A: You definitely want to talk about realism in a game about tanks? Q：給Grille 15一隻準度0.268的15公分炮，這還有王法嘛！這對口徑比括圈小1.5倍的炮是行得通啦，但這種又重又有威力的炮還是這麼穩？ A：你想在遊戲中跟我討論真實對吧？ Q: Are there any TDs or SPGs on the basis of the T-54/T-55 other than the SU-122-54 (D-49 gun) or SU-122-54 (M-62 gun planned)? A: Personally, I haven’t seen any. Q：除了SU-122-54的兩種計畫外，有任何TD或SPG是基於T-54/T-55開發的嗎？ A：個人經驗來說，我還沒看過其他的。 Q: In-game there is the SU-122-44 with a 122mm D-25, were there any plans to mount a D-10T? A: Work didn’t go past a concept, and no discussions about other guns. Q：遊戲中我們有一台122mm D-25炮的SU-122-44，有計畫推出搭載100mm D-10T的版本嗎？ A：過去沒有提到這個概念，也沒有關於其他主炮的討論。 Q: Are you consulted about historical battles, opreations, etc? A: They ask – I consult. Q：你有諮詢過其他有關歷史戰鬥、營運等情況嗎？ A：他們提問，我做顧問。 Q: The SU-100 had a variant that mounted a D-25T, and it seems like this system went well during testing – how come this machine was refused? A: Because it didn’t actually go that well. Q：SU-100有過個衍生型配122主炮，而且測試看起來也不錯，但為什麼這計畫後來廢棄了？ A：因為實際上它運作的沒那麼好。 Q: Yuri, were there any Waffentrager projects on the Tiger chassis, I or II? A: Grille 17. Q：Yuri有任何其他以虎式底盤做的WT計畫嗎？用虎一還虎二做的？ A：Grille 17就是了。 Q: How many actual concepts were spawned from the American T95 medium tank chassis? A: I honestly haven’t counted. For those that want to count I recommend reading works by Richard Hunnicutt. Q：有多少發想與概念是基於美國T95中坦底盤衍生出來的？ A：我其實沒有算過，對那些想要算的人我推薦你們去讀Hunnicutt的書。 Q: How do you feel about the T-34-100 being in the Czech tree? A: What’s the problem? It’s a completely different machine compared to the one developed here. Q：你對於T-34-100放在捷克線的看法是？ A：有問題嗎？那台車跟原本的（蘇聯的）相比完全不同。 Q: How temperamental was the T-64 engine? A: There are very opposing views on this topic. （譯：問T-64引擎的材質，不重要） Q: Why did the USSR reject the Obj. 416? Was it too difficult to manufacture or there are other causes? A: It’s really a TD, but Morozov made a kind of tank, it’s strange and something simpler was required. Q：為什麼Object.416被蘇聯取消了？是因為太難製造還是有其他因素？ A：它就是台TD，但Morozov製造局製作太多種車，416太怪異而且需要其他更簡單的車種。 Q: In terms of general characteristics, what is better – T-10M or IS-7? A: Shashmurin thought the T-10, as a simplified realisation of the Obj. 260. Q：以數據上來看，T-10M跟IS-7哪台比較好？ A：Shashmurin認為T-10作為Object.260概念的簡化，它比較好。 Q: Did the GW E100 exist in reality? Did it have any other guns in project stages? Can WG change the gun to something else? A: The only project on the E-100 chassis was an assault SPG. I hope the answer to the question is understood. Q：GW E-100在現實中存在嗎？在這個計畫層級上還有其他主砲可能嗎？WG有辦法把它的炮換成其他的嗎？ A：基於E-100底盤所開發的唯一計畫是台突擊自走砲，我希望這個解答不難懂。 Q: What projects do you know of on the T-100 chassis? A: T-100H – The first SPG project based on the T-100. T-100U – SPG, constructed in metal. T-100Z – T-100 with a new turret and 152mm field gun M-10. The turret was made and installed in a bunker. T-103 – Coastal defence tank with 130mm gun. Q：你知道有什麼其他關於T-100底盤的計畫嗎？ A：T-100H，第一個基於T-100底盤的自走砲；T-100U，鋼鐵製自走砲；T-100Z，搭載新式砲塔與一門152mm M-10榴炮，砲塔之前設計裝在碉堡上；T-103，搭載130mm炮的海岸巡防車。 T-103圖：http://wot-news.com/uploads/img/112015/pa_8.jpg

Q: Last time there was a question about a 120mm gun on the Lorraine 40t – they must of been talking about this (pic: imagine Foch on Lorraine chassis) can you tell us about it? A: There is not much to tell here. They built it, tested it, didn’t like it. Potentially there’s no issues with making this tank, we know the base. The question is about protection, this isn’t a Foch. Q：上次有一個關於洛琳40T搭載120mm炮的問題，他們必須被提及（譯：諸位可以想像一下Foch裝在洛琳底盤上的樣子），你可以談談嗎？ A：沒甚麼好說的，他們做好它、測試它，但不喜歡它，可能在製造上沒問題，但防護力不行，畢竟這不是台Foch。（譯：正面防護有問題之類） Lorraine 40T w/ 120mm圖：http://wot-news.com/uploads/img/112015/pa_9.jpg

Q: What TDs and SPGs are there based on the T-62? A: T-62 is a TD, technically a simplified version of the IT-1. At the beginning, “Object 166” was being developed as a new medium tank, with plans to develop/test it between 1959-1960 and put in to serial production in 1961. But in February of 1959 the topic changed to “… tank destroyer with a new, powerful, smooth-bore gun, with dual plane stabilisation, using the new ‘Molot’ and ‘Rapira’ guns”. There were plans to build 50 “Object 166” TDs. Q：有任何基於T-62底盤衍生的TD或SPG嗎？ A：T-62其實是台TD，技術上是簡化版本的IT-1（譯：蘇聯開發的飛彈戰車）。剛開始Object.166被發展為一種新的中坦，計畫在1959年到1960年間投入開發與測試，並於1961年投入量產。但在1959年二月計畫變更為「...搭載新型、威力更強的滑膛炮，輔以水平/垂直穩定器，並裝上Rapira 100mm滑膛炮與Molot槍械。曾經計畫建造 50台的Object.166 TD。這篇落落長...有很多東西我也不是很懂，有錯麻煩版友不吝指正。原文網址：http://thearmoredpatrol.com/2015/11/02/yuri-pasholok-qa-6/ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.36.75.126 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Wargaming/M.1446488912.A.64E.html

推

nicokelly

11/03 03:32, , 1^F

11/03 03:32, 1^F

推

titantang

11/03 06:32, , 2^F

11/03 06:32, 2^F

推

greedxu3

11/03 07:07, , 3^F

11/03 07:07, 3^F