Re: [討論] 想請問老拿皇最大的敗筆在哪(小結論）
: 推 bloodpledge: 其實我是認為征俄說到底就是場爛仗 以拿皇急須取得 03/17 10:20
: → bloodpledge: 戰果的壓力 後果大概相去不遠 帶相對少的部隊也許徹 03/17 10:20
: → bloodpledge: 退時的狀況更慘 說不定也沒第六次反法了 征俄的六十 03/17 10:20
: → bloodpledge: 萬可過半都是盟國 法軍自己也就二十幾萬 03/17 10:21
: 推 reddevilkc: 可以問一下哪裡可以看到征俄大軍團各國軍隊比例的詳細 03/17 11:35
: → reddevilkc: 資料嗎? 我看wiki法軍約55萬 沒有看過法軍只占一半的 03/17 11:36
: → reddevilkc: 說法過@@ 03/17 11:36
19世紀不同作者描述拿皇征俄時，寫出的兵力數據都不相同，兩位提及的數據也都只是說
法之一，沒必要過於鑽研；法軍只佔一半的說法其實還蠻常見的就是，維基百科就有提到
過部分作者如此描述。
然而，總兵力六十萬和法軍二十幾萬來自於不同的說法，b板友這樣把兩個數據湊到一塊
不是很恰當。法軍二十萬通常是包含在「四十萬人渡過尼曼河」的描述中，如果認為渡過
尼曼河的兵力有六十萬人，那麼法軍通常會說是三十萬人以上(至少一半)。
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_invasion_of_Russia#Opposing_forces
[Georges] Lefebvre says that Napoleon crossed the Neman with over 600,000
soldiers, only half of whom were from France, the others being mainly Poles
and Germans.
Richard K. Riehn provides the following figures: 685,000 men marched into
Russia in 1812, of whom around 355,000 were French; 31,000 soldiers marched
out again in some sort of military formation, with perhaps another 35,000
stragglers, for a total of fewer than 70,000 known survivors
http://www.napolun.com/mirror/web2.airmail.net/napoleon/FRENCH_ARMY.htm
William Napier writes: "... the 200,000 French soldiers arrived on the Niemen
in company with 200,000 allies. ... assembled by this wonderful man, all
disciplined warriors, and notwithstanding their different national feelings,
all proud of the unmatched genius of their leader." (Napier - "History of the
War in the Peninsula" Vol III, p 447)
(懶得查書，姑且先看一下網路上的說法就好)
--
The nation which forgets its defenders will be itself forgotten.
～John Calvin Coolidge, Jr.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.171.174.186
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Warfare/M.1489726219.A.C46.html
推
03/17 13:36, , 1F
03/17 13:36, 1F
→
03/17 13:38, , 2F
03/17 13:38, 2F
推
03/17 16:57, , 3F
03/17 16:57, 3F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容：
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 9 篇)：