Re: [問題] 日軍的一號作戰,是成功的嗎?

看板Warfare作者 (百變Q葫蘆娃)時間8年前 (2015/10/01 15:56), 8年前編輯推噓3(307)
留言10則, 7人參與, 最新討論串34/56 (看更多)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Army_Air_Forces The United States Army Air Forces (USAAF or AAF) were the military aviation service of the United States of America during and immediately after World War II, successor to the United States Army Air Corps and the direct predecessor of the United States Air Force. The AAF were a component of the United States Army, which in 1942 was divided functionally by executive order into three autonomous forces: the Army Ground Forces, the Services of Supply (which in 1943 became the Army Service Forces), and the Army Air Forces. Each of these forces had a commanding general who reported directly to the Army Chief of Staff. ------------------ 美國陸軍航空隊是構成美國陸軍的一部分之一。美國陸軍依照1942年的行政命令可分為三 部分:地面部隊、後勤部隊、航空隊,每個部隊都直接聽命於同一位美國陸軍參謀長。 ------------------ 傳教士:兵科跟軍種是一樣的!後勤部隊也是一支獨立軍種! 英文維基亂寫一通,我才是對的! -- ◢◢ 哈哈! 好久沒上來發廢文了! 幹你媽的! 惡雷放了就想跑! ▄▆▆▊▃▃ ◢◣ ───┘ └── ▋▋▋ ▂▂ █◤▎▎ 船長! 這文章有人護航啊! ─▇ ███ XXXX ◢██◣ U-978 ───┘ ◥█████████ ◢█◣ ◥==▁ ▁ ▁ ▁ ▁ ▁ ▁ ▁ ◥ ◤ ▊◥ ▅▄▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▄▅▆ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.240.107.21 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Warfare/M.1443686171.A.020.html ※ 編輯: ronray7799 (111.240.107.21), 10/01/2015 15:57:52

10/01 15:57, , 1F
好大的耳光啊
10/01 15:57, 1F

10/01 16:00, , 2F
ronray7799:所以USMC是海軍才對
10/01 16:00, 2F

10/01 16:01, , 3F
不要跳針 你直接說英文WIKI就是錯的
10/01 16:01, 3F

10/01 16:02, , 4F
而且U.S. Marine Corps中並沒有摻進Navy
10/01 16:02, 4F

10/01 16:04, , 5F
elmotze不覺的爭這個非常沒意義嗎?
10/01 16:04, 5F

10/01 16:04, , 6F
USMC地位是法律特別定義了,如果在台灣或他國,大多都是附
10/01 16:04, 6F

10/01 16:04, , 7F
屬地位,因此用名字來看問題會很大
10/01 16:04, 7F

10/01 16:04, , 8F
傳教大,建議您去細讀一下g.i在wiki的頁面即可
10/01 16:04, 8F

10/01 16:06, , 9F
不只沒有意義,還是獨創到連美國都會不可思議
10/01 16:06, 9F
※ 編輯: ronray7799 (111.240.107.21), 10/01/2015 16:13:41

10/01 17:14, , 10F
就說專有名詞的定義給你看了 某e還再堅持自創分類幹嘛..
10/01 17:14, 10F
文章代碼(AID): #1M3ESR0W (Warfare)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1M3ESR0W (Warfare)