Re: [三國] 6.8XD的甄姬
※ 引述《whsh3310 (QQTTQQ)》之銘言:
: 甄姬在目前版本(XD6.x)裡面是個偏弱的近敏,這已經被大家討論過很多次了。
: 吃兵賺錢=>袁紹完勝
: 壓線能力=>毒標優勢就是短CD、緩速,方便甄姬追擊。但是同樣擁有傷害技能的馬超、
: 大橋,甚至會長推的趙雲壓線能力都不會輸給甄姬。
: 天生體質=>馬超、袁紹完勝,連有魔抗的大橋在法師秒殺盛行之下,都比甄姬硬。
: 逃跑技能=>小橋、馬超完勝,甚至徐盛無視地形的衝鋒都比甄姬的閃光可靠。閃光瞬移
: 除了要有小兵英雄才能瞬移之外,更常發生的就是瞬移到小兵之中被卡住的悲劇。
: 被動大決=>袁紹的爆擊完勝,而且袁紹還有其他兩招傷害技能可以開,瞬傷比甄姬高非常
: 多。在人品低落的時候,連徐盛的大決都比甄姬可靠。
: 甄姬是個非常需要與人對著幹的英雄,天生沒保命跑速,遇到人想跑也跑不掉,只能硬幹
: 祈禱人品發動秒人。
: 在目前法傷盛行的XD6系列中,甄姬的36%閃避效益不高,配合需要人品發動的大決,要
: 秒人更顯困難。在同樣等級金錢之下,趙雲袁紹馬超樂進跟甄姬PK幾乎都樂勝。
: 甄姬現在的囧況就是單殺殺不到,會戰幫不上,自high賺不多。
把每個英雄長處拿來打甄姬臉好像不大對
機動性贏過袁紹趙雲,賺錢贏過馬超徐盛(不用冒著人出去的危險),體質贏小喬
36%閃避在高法傷時代,是不是代表她更能專注撐血和玄靈而不太需要撐防?
這樣看起來好像又有點強?
三國畢竟還是團體遊戲,但在討論英雄優劣時大多都用單殺角度在看。
在有隊友配合情況下,穩穩賺錢後裝備撐起來優勢也很大。(廢話!)
甄姬的問題在於現在沒多少人喜歡輔助等她長大...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.113.122.90
→
09/13 17:09, , 1F
09/13 17:09, 1F
→
09/13 17:09, , 2F
09/13 17:09, 2F
→
09/13 17:09, , 3F
09/13 17:09, 3F
→
09/13 17:10, , 4F
09/13 17:10, 4F
→
09/13 17:10, , 5F
09/13 17:10, 5F
→
09/13 17:11, , 6F
09/13 17:11, 6F
推
09/13 17:11, , 7F
09/13 17:11, 7F
→
09/13 17:15, , 8F
09/13 17:15, 8F
→
09/13 17:16, , 9F
09/13 17:16, 9F
→
09/13 17:18, , 10F
09/13 17:18, 10F
推
09/13 17:18, , 11F
09/13 17:18, 11F
→
09/13 17:19, , 12F
09/13 17:19, 12F
→
09/13 17:19, , 13F
09/13 17:19, 13F
推
09/13 18:16, , 14F
09/13 18:16, 14F
→
09/13 18:17, , 15F
09/13 18:17, 15F
→
09/13 18:18, , 16F
09/13 18:18, 16F
→
09/13 18:19, , 17F
09/13 18:19, 17F
推
09/13 18:22, , 18F
09/13 18:22, 18F
→
09/13 19:32, , 19F
09/13 19:32, 19F
→
09/13 19:33, , 20F
09/13 19:33, 20F
推
09/13 20:55, , 21F
09/13 20:55, 21F
推
09/13 21:50, , 22F
09/13 21:50, 22F
→
09/13 21:51, , 23F
09/13 21:51, 23F
推
09/13 22:01, , 24F
09/13 22:01, 24F
推
09/13 22:10, , 25F
09/13 22:10, 25F
→
09/13 22:12, , 26F
09/13 22:12, 26F
推
09/13 22:13, , 27F
09/13 22:13, 27F
推
09/13 22:15, , 28F
09/13 22:15, 28F
推
09/13 22:15, , 29F
09/13 22:15, 29F
→
09/13 22:16, , 30F
09/13 22:16, 30F
推
09/13 22:18, , 31F
09/13 22:18, 31F
→
09/13 22:19, , 32F
09/13 22:19, 32F
→
09/13 22:20, , 33F
09/13 22:20, 33F
推
09/13 22:23, , 34F
09/13 22:23, 34F
→
09/13 22:24, , 35F
09/13 22:24, 35F
→
09/13 22:24, , 36F
09/13 22:24, 36F
→
09/13 22:25, , 37F
09/13 22:25, 37F
→
09/13 22:26, , 38F
09/13 22:26, 38F
→
09/13 22:42, , 39F
09/13 22:42, 39F
→
09/13 22:58, , 40F
09/13 22:58, 40F
→
09/13 23:13, , 41F
09/13 23:13, 41F
→
09/13 23:14, , 42F
09/13 23:14, 42F
推
09/13 23:21, , 43F
09/13 23:21, 43F
推
09/13 23:53, , 44F
09/13 23:53, 44F
→
09/14 05:49, , 45F
09/14 05:49, 45F
→
09/14 05:49, , 46F
09/14 05:49, 46F
→
09/14 05:51, , 47F
09/14 05:51, 47F
→
09/14 05:51, , 48F
09/14 05:51, 48F
推
09/14 05:54, , 49F
09/14 05:54, 49F
→
09/14 05:56, , 50F
09/14 05:56, 50F
→
09/14 08:22, , 51F
09/14 08:22, 51F
推
09/14 09:41, , 52F
09/14 09:41, 52F
推
09/14 09:43, , 53F
09/14 09:43, 53F
→
09/14 10:07, , 54F
09/14 10:07, 54F
推
09/14 10:10, , 55F
09/14 10:10, 55F
推
09/14 10:26, , 56F
09/14 10:26, 56F
推
09/14 12:19, , 57F
09/14 12:19, 57F
→
09/14 12:19, , 58F
09/14 12:19, 58F
→
09/14 12:30, , 59F
09/14 12:30, 59F
→
09/14 12:31, , 60F
09/14 12:31, 60F
→
09/14 12:32, , 61F
09/14 12:32, 61F
→
09/14 12:34, , 62F
09/14 12:34, 62F
→
09/14 12:35, , 63F
09/14 12:35, 63F
推
09/14 16:14, , 64F
09/14 16:14, 64F
推
09/14 17:07, , 65F
09/14 17:07, 65F
→
09/14 18:02, , 66F
09/14 18:02, 66F
推
09/14 18:05, , 67F
09/14 18:05, 67F
推
09/14 18:06, , 68F
09/14 18:06, 68F
推
09/14 18:19, , 69F
09/14 18:19, 69F
推
09/14 19:18, , 70F
09/14 19:18, 70F
推
09/14 19:56, , 71F
09/14 19:56, 71F
→
09/14 19:59, , 72F
09/14 19:59, 72F
推
09/14 20:00, , 73F
09/14 20:00, 73F
→
09/14 20:01, , 74F
09/14 20:01, 74F
→
09/14 20:15, , 75F
09/14 20:15, 75F
推
09/15 05:07, , 76F
09/15 05:07, 76F
→
09/15 05:08, , 77F
09/15 05:08, 77F
推
09/15 09:25, , 78F
09/15 09:25, 78F
推
09/15 11:03, , 79F
09/15 11:03, 79F
討論串 (同標題文章)