[情報] 藍帖關於"塞拉摩事件很無聊"的回應
來源一樣是mmo
http://www.mmo-champion.com/content/
不逐字翻
簡單來講就是他們以為玩家怕事件太長，而且希望事件能重複刷所以做的很短，
不過他們發現這錯了，因此以後的事件會放更多劇情。
下面是原文:
Scenarios Feedback
how about the fact that NONE of this is explained properly? we dont see
rhonin die, we dont see how jaina survived and we dont see WHY it happened
This is actually a concern the Developers addressed in a recent Developer Q&A
session over at the Best Buy site. Here is what they had to say:
Q: The story of Tides of War is really interesting. I don't think players can
get engaged if they have no idea what's happening, the bomb dropping is
really anticlimactic. I felt a bit disappointed so little got included in the
scenario. Was this because of lack of time, of developers or because you
rather keep all that info in the novels.
A: I've been watching the Theramore feedback closely, and this comment seems
pretty universal. We tried to keep everything all in the scenario, to make it
really self-contained, but not burden it with lots of story that you have to
slog through every time you played the scenario. It's pretty clear from the
feedback that people wanted more story. We should've surrounded the scenarios
with more quests or explanations to help round out the story for the people
who wanted to know what exactly was happening. Lesson learned!
As you can probably get from this, we acknowledge that we didn't put in the
level of context that people expected, and this is an important lesson we
will keep in mind when working on future scenarios.
We want scenarios to be repayable, so we are concerned about burdening
players with too much story that feels mandatory to wade through, but we can
of course see from all the feedback we got from you guys that is also an
issue if there is not enough story. We realise that Theramore could have
benefited from one or more one-time quests on either end of the scenario,
perhaps it could even have been a part of a one-time quest chain.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.170.188.118
→
09/21 20:13, , 1F
09/21 20:13, 1F
→
09/21 20:16, , 2F
09/21 20:16, 2F
→
09/21 20:19, , 3F
09/21 20:19, 3F
推
09/21 20:19, , 4F
09/21 20:19, 4F
→
09/21 20:23, , 5F
09/21 20:23, 5F
→
09/21 20:24, , 6F
09/21 20:24, 6F
推
09/21 20:29, , 7F
09/21 20:29, 7F
→
09/21 20:29, , 8F
09/21 20:29, 8F
→
09/21 20:33, , 9F
09/21 20:33, 9F
推
09/21 20:36, , 10F
09/21 20:36, 10F
推
09/21 20:57, , 11F
09/21 20:57, 11F
推
09/21 21:37, , 12F
09/21 21:37, 12F
推
09/21 21:49, , 13F
09/21 21:49, 13F
→
09/21 21:53, , 14F
09/21 21:53, 14F
推
09/21 22:03, , 15F
09/21 22:03, 15F
→
09/21 22:43, , 16F
09/21 22:43, 16F
推
09/21 23:35, , 17F
09/21 23:35, 17F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文：
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 7 篇)：