[外電] Barkley：健康的雷霆是奪冠最大熱門
來源：http://ppt.cc/h4su
翻譯：http://voice.hupu.com/nba/1902952.html
Charles Barkley says a healthy Thunder team will be the favorite to win the
championship.
Charles Barkley認為，只要雷霆保持健康，他們就是最大的奪冠熱門，本賽季沒進季後
賽完全是因為傷病。
Barkley calls the idea of firing coach Scott Brooks “one of the stupidest
things I’ve ever heard.”
Barkley 認為炒掉SB教練是"一件我聽過最愚蠢的事"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TNT analyst Charles Barkley discussed the Oklahoma City Thunder in a
conference call Friday:
Why doesn’t Russell Westbrook deserve consideration for MVP?
問題：為什麼Russell Westbrook不值得當選MVP？
If your next game is not until November, you shouldn’t be in the MVP
conversation.
Barkley：如果你的下一場比賽還在11月，那你就沒資格競選MVP。
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What are the Thunder’s prospects for next season?
雷霆下賽季前景如何？
If you guys keep the team the way it is now and get Westbrook and (Kevin)
Durant healthy, to go with (Enes) Kanter, (Steven) Adams, (Mitch) McGary,
(Serge) Ibaka, in my opinion, you guys will be the favorite to win the
championship. The only reason you guys are out of the playoffs is strictly
because of injuries. You still also made the playoffs missing the MVP. But if
you look at that team on paper, because I love McGary and Adams, and I love
Kanter, and if you put them with Westbrook and Durant, there’s no doubt in
my mind that you guys will be one of the top three teams according to the
sports book. You just got to get healthy. You stole Kanter and I’ve been a
McGary fan since he was at Michigan. Everybody loves Adams. I like Ibaka.
Tell Serge to quit shooting all those threes and take his big butt down on
the box. Maybe you can do that with Adams, McGary and now Kanter. If you get
everybody healthy, your team is awesome. Really to be honest with you, for
the next five years, you guys will be legitimate contenders.
如果這支球隊的人都還在，算上健康的Westbrook、Durant、Kanter、Adams、McGary、
Ibaka，在我看來，你們會是冠軍的最大熱門。你們這賽季沒打進季後賽沒別的原因，就
是因為傷病，你們也讓季後賽少了一個MVP。但是你看看這支球隊紙面上的實力，因為我
喜歡McGary和Adams，我喜歡Kanter，如果你把他們放在Westbrook和Durant身邊，在我看
來你們毫無疑問會是體育史上最強的3支球隊之一，你們要做的就是保持健康。你們偷到
了Kanter，McGary在University of Michigan的時候我就是他球迷了，人人都愛Adams，
我喜歡Ibaka。回去告訴Ibaka，別再投那些三分球了，用好你的大屁股，去低位打打。也
許你可以讓Adams這麼做，讓McGary這麼做，現在輪到Kanter了。如果你們每個人都保持
健康，你們隊簡直太讚了。真的，坦率地講，接下來5年裡，你們都會是冠軍的有力爭奪
者。
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Should the Thunder make a coaching change?
雷霆的教練需要換換嗎？
For some reason, you all want to keep wanting to fire your coach and I have
no idea why. Scott Brooks, man, has done a good job. Anybody else lose the
MVP and is fighting to the end? People forget that Westbrook missed some
games early in the season. And you spent the whole season without the MVP,
the second best basketball player in the world, and you almost made the
playoffs. The only thing I hear is these idiots on television talking about
how Scott Brooks is on the hot seat. I mean that’s just crazy to me.
Everybody knows Scott Brooks lived with me for a minute and he is a friend of
mine, but this has nothing to do with that. For you guys to be without the
MVP basically all season and still almost make the playoffs, I don’t know
what more you all want in Oklahoma City. I really don’t. The notion that you
all are even thinking about firing your coach has got to be one of the
stupidest things I’ve ever heard.
出於某些原因，你們一直想炒掉自己的教練，我也不知道為什麼。Scott Brooks，哥們，
他做得不錯了。會有其他人在失去一位MVP之後戰鬥到最後嗎？人們好像忘了Westbrook在
賽季早期也缺席了不少比賽，而且你們整個賽季都沒有那位MVP，世界上最好的籃球運動
員，而且你們差點就打進了季後賽。我有聽到一些白痴在電視上說Scott Brooks有多麼如
坐針氈，我的意思是，對我來說這太瘋狂了，每個人都知道Scott Brooks是我的朋友，但
是這兩件事之間沒任何關係。對你們來說，整個賽季都沒有那位MVP的情況下險些闖入季
後賽，我不知道你們還有什麼更多的要求。你們甚至還在考慮解雇主教練，這是我聽過最
愚蠢的事情。
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
心得：
1.我覺得雷霆健康，不用什麼複雜戰術也能奪冠。
2.我喜歡SB營造的球隊氣氛和化學反應，雖然他的戰術確實不怎樣。
3.難以想像SB被炒的後遺症會是什麼，若沒有極佳的人選，個人是不希望換教練。
4.有時覺得大家要求太多了，波波維奇只有一個。
5.SB以教練的平均年齡來說，真的很年輕，今年整體也進步很多。
6.想太多還是沒用，最後還是總管決定的唄XD
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.165.115.36
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Thunder/M.1429272262.A.B10.html
推
04/17 20:06, , 1F
04/17 20:06, 1F
推
04/17 20:42, , 2F
04/17 20:42, 2F
推
04/17 21:02, , 3F
04/17 21:02, 3F
→
04/17 21:02, , 4F
04/17 21:02, 4F
推
04/17 23:29, , 5F
04/17 23:29, 5F
→
04/17 23:29, , 6F
04/17 23:29, 6F
→
04/17 23:30, , 7F
04/17 23:30, 7F
→
04/17 23:30, , 8F
04/17 23:30, 8F
推
04/18 11:03, , 9F
04/18 11:03, 9F
→
04/18 11:36, , 10F
04/18 11:36, 10F
→
04/18 11:38, , 11F
04/18 11:38, 11F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇)：