[討論] 為什麼設備可以找外勞不能找文組?消失
設備連外勞都可以作
卻不能找文組
沒有人覺得很奇怪嗎?
在更深度的探討
要問為什麼政府會同意讓外勞去當設備?
那些私校文阻生 在7-11 在麥當勞 在星巴克
為什麼不把設備的工作留給他們?
外勞應該去漁船 或是去那種很熱很臭的傳產工廠
因為那些地方真的沒有本國勞工願意去
科技業都有冷氣 到底憑什麼找外勞?
外勞作業員就算了
你知道嗎?
機況差的時候 設備忙得要死
機況好的時候 大夜外勞設備也是在那邊滑手機
沒人覺得 外勞太氾濫了嗎?
政府怎麼不修法控制?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.177.25.41
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Tech_Job/M.1504419760.A.E5D.html
推
09/03 14:23, , 1F
09/03 14:23, 1F
→
09/03 14:24, , 2F
09/03 14:24, 2F
推
09/03 14:24, , 3F
09/03 14:24, 3F
噓
09/03 14:26, , 4F
09/03 14:26, 4F
推
09/03 14:26, , 5F
09/03 14:26, 5F
推
09/03 14:27, , 6F
09/03 14:27, 6F
噓
09/03 14:27, , 7F
09/03 14:27, 7F
守護本國人的工作權叫歧視 你左膠?
→
09/03 14:27, , 8F
09/03 14:27, 8F
※ 編輯: pled (180.177.25.41), 09/03/2017 14:28:34
推
09/03 14:29, , 9F
09/03 14:29, 9F
噓
09/03 14:33, , 10F
09/03 14:33, 10F
→
09/03 14:35, , 11F
09/03 14:35, 11F
→
09/03 14:36, , 12F
09/03 14:36, 12F
→
09/03 14:43, , 13F
09/03 14:43, 13F
推
09/03 14:44, , 14F
09/03 14:44, 14F
資方就是能給越低的工資越好啊 才不管你本勞外勞
如果火星人工資更低
資方會毫不猶豫的用火星人當員工
所以重點在我們的政策
不應該開放科技業用外勞
就算是大夜
修機PM也是由一個本國的設備工程師
帶一兩個外勞跟著他修
外勞只要聽他指揮就好
站在設備工程師的立場
外勞語言不通
指揮外勞還不如指揮文阻畢業生
我發這篇就是有感
公司只想cost down
跟外勞溝通的麻煩就是基層工程師在受
※ 編輯: pled (180.177.25.41), 09/03/2017 14:51:23
→
09/03 14:45, , 15F
09/03 14:45, 15F
→
09/03 14:47, , 16F
09/03 14:47, 16F
推
09/03 14:50, , 17F
09/03 14:50, 17F
→
09/03 14:50, , 18F
09/03 14:50, 18F
推
09/03 14:51, , 19F
09/03 14:51, 19F
→
09/03 14:52, , 20F
09/03 14:52, 20F
→
09/03 14:55, , 21F
09/03 14:55, 21F
→
09/03 14:55, , 22F
09/03 14:55, 22F
推
09/03 15:09, , 23F
09/03 15:09, 23F
噓
09/03 15:10, , 24F
09/03 15:10, 24F
→
09/03 15:11, , 25F
09/03 15:11, 25F
推
09/03 15:14, , 26F
09/03 15:14, 26F
噓
09/03 15:16, , 27F
09/03 15:16, 27F
→
09/03 15:16, , 28F
09/03 15:16, 28F
→
09/03 15:16, , 29F
09/03 15:16, 29F
→
09/03 15:16, , 30F
09/03 15:16, 30F
→
09/03 15:16, , 31F
09/03 15:16, 31F
推
09/03 15:19, , 32F
09/03 15:19, 32F
→
09/03 15:21, , 33F
09/03 15:21, 33F
→
09/03 15:21, , 34F
09/03 15:21, 34F
噓
09/03 15:22, , 35F
09/03 15:22, 35F
推
09/03 15:22, , 36F
09/03 15:22, 36F
還有 28 則推文
推
09/03 16:04, , 65F
09/03 16:04, 65F
推
09/03 16:05, , 66F
09/03 16:05, 66F
→
09/03 16:06, , 67F
09/03 16:06, 67F
→
09/03 16:09, , 68F
09/03 16:09, 68F
→
09/03 16:09, , 69F
09/03 16:09, 69F
→
09/03 16:09, , 70F
09/03 16:09, 70F
→
09/03 16:10, , 71F
09/03 16:10, 71F
→
09/03 16:11, , 72F
09/03 16:11, 72F
→
09/03 16:11, , 73F
09/03 16:11, 73F
噓
09/03 16:12, , 74F
09/03 16:12, 74F
→
09/03 16:13, , 75F
09/03 16:13, 75F
→
09/03 16:13, , 76F
09/03 16:13, 76F
噓
09/03 16:15, , 77F
09/03 16:15, 77F
噓
09/03 16:15, , 78F
09/03 16:15, 78F
→
09/03 16:15, , 79F
09/03 16:15, 79F
推
09/03 16:16, , 80F
09/03 16:16, 80F
推
09/03 16:17, , 81F
09/03 16:17, 81F
→
09/03 16:17, , 82F
09/03 16:17, 82F
→
09/03 16:19, , 83F
09/03 16:19, 83F
→
09/03 16:19, , 84F
09/03 16:19, 84F
推
09/03 16:24, , 85F
09/03 16:24, 85F
噓
09/03 16:24, , 86F
09/03 16:24, 86F
推
09/03 16:27, , 87F
09/03 16:27, 87F
推
09/03 16:27, , 88F
09/03 16:27, 88F
→
09/03 16:27, , 89F
09/03 16:27, 89F
噓
09/03 16:28, , 90F
09/03 16:28, 90F
→
09/03 16:28, , 91F
09/03 16:28, 91F
推
09/03 16:28, , 92F
09/03 16:28, 92F
推
09/03 16:31, , 93F
09/03 16:31, 93F
推
09/03 16:32, , 94F
09/03 16:32, 94F
→
09/03 16:32, , 95F
09/03 16:32, 95F
→
09/03 16:32, , 96F
09/03 16:32, 96F
→
09/03 16:33, , 97F
09/03 16:33, 97F
噓
09/03 16:34, , 98F
09/03 16:34, 98F
噓
09/03 16:35, , 99F
09/03 16:35, 99F
噓
09/03 16:36, , 100F
09/03 16:36, 100F
噓
09/03 16:37, , 101F
09/03 16:37, 101F
噓
09/03 16:38, , 102F
09/03 16:38, 102F
噓
09/03 16:40, , 103F
09/03 16:40, 103F
噓
09/03 16:42, , 104F
09/03 16:42, 104F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):