[討論] 碩(學)士畢業新鮮人工程師多久年薪破百萬
周末輕鬆討論的話題~
此命題固然有未詳盡的條件敘述,
什麼產業? 哪家公司? 什麼職務? 進公司什麼職等?職稱? 跳槽?
年薪(包含所有)百萬也只是一個數字基準
所以先鎖定新鮮人,就是任何年資0
碩士優先討論,學士歡迎補充
以一個稱為工程師 Engineer
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%B7%A5%E7%A8%8B%E5%B8%88
工程師(英語:Engineer)是指那些在工程專業領域的人,他們使用科學知識來駕馭技術
以解決實際問題,並以此為職業。6月6日為工程師節。
為職業的人,在台灣這個年代,多久年薪破百呢?
--
作者 booker12 (布克) 看板 Gossiping
標題 [爆卦] 剛剛罵哭了反服貿的智能同學
時間 Sat Mar 22 12:42:27 2014
→
03/22 12:42,
03/22 12:42
→
03/22 12:42,
03/22 12:42
→
03/22 12:42,
03/22 12:42
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.165.112.51
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Tech_Job/M.1416040980.A.51D.html
推
11/15 16:44, , 1F
11/15 16:44, 1F
推
11/15 16:45, , 2F
11/15 16:45, 2F
→
11/15 16:54, , 3F
11/15 16:54, 3F
噓
11/15 16:57, , 4F
11/15 16:57, 4F
推
11/15 17:02, , 5F
11/15 17:02, 5F
推
11/15 17:04, , 6F
11/15 17:04, 6F
推
11/15 17:08, , 7F
11/15 17:08, 7F
推
11/15 17:32, , 8F
11/15 17:32, 8F
→
11/15 17:32, , 9F
11/15 17:32, 9F
推
11/15 17:34, , 10F
11/15 17:34, 10F
推
11/15 17:36, , 11F
11/15 17:36, 11F
→
11/15 17:46, , 12F
11/15 17:46, 12F
→
11/15 18:01, , 13F
11/15 18:01, 13F
→
11/15 18:01, , 14F
11/15 18:01, 14F
→
11/15 18:08, , 15F
11/15 18:08, 15F
→
11/15 18:20, , 16F
11/15 18:20, 16F
推
11/15 18:35, , 17F
11/15 18:35, 17F
→
11/15 18:42, , 18F
11/15 18:42, 18F
推
11/15 18:49, , 19F
11/15 18:49, 19F
推
11/15 18:57, , 20F
11/15 18:57, 20F
推
11/15 19:05, , 21F
11/15 19:05, 21F
→
11/15 19:18, , 22F
11/15 19:18, 22F
推
11/15 19:31, , 23F
11/15 19:31, 23F
→
11/15 19:34, , 24F
11/15 19:34, 24F
→
11/15 19:34, , 25F
11/15 19:34, 25F
噓
11/15 19:48, , 26F
11/15 19:48, 26F
噓
11/15 19:55, , 27F
11/15 19:55, 27F
噓
11/15 19:56, , 28F
11/15 19:56, 28F
→
11/15 19:56, , 29F
11/15 19:56, 29F
→
11/15 19:57, , 30F
11/15 19:57, 30F
噓
11/15 19:58, , 31F
11/15 19:58, 31F
→
11/15 19:59, , 32F
11/15 19:59, 32F
→
11/15 20:23, , 33F
11/15 20:23, 33F
噓
11/15 20:25, , 34F
11/15 20:25, 34F
也可說 未來願意爬文翻到這些文章 也可少問點 現在薪水就是這樣
有沒有那個資格給他拿
噓
11/15 20:29, , 35F
11/15 20:29, 35F
→
11/15 20:57, , 36F
11/15 20:57, 36F
推
11/15 21:11, , 37F
11/15 21:11, 37F
噓
11/15 21:49, , 38F
11/15 21:49, 38F
推
11/15 21:52, , 39F
11/15 21:52, 39F
→
11/15 22:24, , 40F
11/15 22:24, 40F
→
11/15 22:24, , 41F
11/15 22:24, 41F
→
11/15 22:41, , 42F
11/15 22:41, 42F
→
11/15 22:41, , 43F
11/15 22:41, 43F
→
11/15 23:00, , 44F
11/15 23:00, 44F
噓
11/16 00:01, , 45F
11/16 00:01, 45F
推
11/16 00:07, , 46F
11/16 00:07, 46F
推
11/16 00:07, , 47F
11/16 00:07, 47F
→
11/16 00:12, , 48F
11/16 00:12, 48F
※ 編輯: MeiHS (118.165.24.67), 11/16/2014 00:15:48
噓
11/16 00:24, , 49F
11/16 00:24, 49F
→
11/16 00:29, , 50F
11/16 00:29, 50F
然後工作基薪越高 可投資基數就越多 同個案子傳的分%就有可能越多 邏輯有錯?
※ 編輯: MeiHS (118.165.24.67), 11/16/2014 00:40:53
推
11/16 02:52, , 51F
11/16 02:52, 51F
→
11/16 03:01, , 52F
11/16 03:01, 52F
推
11/16 03:02, , 53F
11/16 03:02, 53F
推
11/16 07:57, , 54F
11/16 07:57, 54F
噓
11/16 12:20, , 55F
11/16 12:20, 55F
推
11/16 23:12, , 56F
11/16 23:12, 56F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 11 篇):