[討論] RD vs. PM 發展性與待遇
請教各位
在台灣科技業
PM 與RD 都是非常重要的主力職位
由於角色的不同 通常也容易發生對立的情形
不知兩者
在職涯上的 發展性 (or 升官至高階重要職位) 與 待遇上
RD 與 PM 之間的孰優孰劣呢?
不知各位有什麼樣的看法與經驗?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.80.238.61
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Tech_Job/M.1412166622.A.216.html
→
10/01 20:43, , 1F
10/01 20:43, 1F
→
10/01 20:44, , 2F
10/01 20:44, 2F
→
10/01 20:57, , 3F
10/01 20:57, 3F
推
10/01 20:58, , 4F
10/01 20:58, 4F
→
10/01 20:58, , 5F
10/01 20:58, 5F
→
10/01 20:59, , 6F
10/01 20:59, 6F
推
10/01 20:59, , 7F
10/01 20:59, 7F
→
10/01 21:00, , 8F
10/01 21:00, 8F
推
10/01 21:03, , 9F
10/01 21:03, 9F
→
10/01 21:04, , 10F
10/01 21:04, 10F
推
10/01 21:20, , 11F
10/01 21:20, 11F
→
10/01 21:21, , 12F
10/01 21:21, 12F
推
10/01 21:27, , 13F
10/01 21:27, 13F
→
10/01 21:32, , 14F
10/01 21:32, 14F
→
10/01 21:34, , 15F
10/01 21:34, 15F
→
10/01 21:36, , 16F
10/01 21:36, 16F
→
10/01 22:04, , 17F
10/01 22:04, 17F
推
10/01 22:07, , 18F
10/01 22:07, 18F
推
10/01 22:23, , 19F
10/01 22:23, 19F
→
10/01 22:24, , 20F
10/01 22:24, 20F
推
10/01 22:26, , 21F
10/01 22:26, 21F
→
10/01 22:27, , 22F
10/01 22:27, 22F
→
10/01 22:27, , 23F
10/01 22:27, 23F
→
10/01 22:29, , 24F
10/01 22:29, 24F
推
10/01 22:30, , 25F
10/01 22:30, 25F
推
10/01 22:32, , 26F
10/01 22:32, 26F
→
10/01 22:37, , 27F
10/01 22:37, 27F
→
10/01 22:38, , 28F
10/01 22:38, 28F
→
10/01 22:38, , 29F
10/01 22:38, 29F
→
10/01 22:39, , 30F
10/01 22:39, 30F
→
10/01 22:41, , 31F
10/01 22:41, 31F
推
10/01 22:41, , 32F
10/01 22:41, 32F
→
10/01 22:42, , 33F
10/01 22:42, 33F
推
10/01 22:45, , 34F
10/01 22:45, 34F
→
10/01 22:46, , 35F
10/01 22:46, 35F
→
10/01 22:47, , 36F
10/01 22:47, 36F
推
10/01 22:47, , 37F
10/01 22:47, 37F
→
10/01 22:48, , 38F
10/01 22:48, 38F
→
10/01 22:48, , 39F
10/01 22:48, 39F
→
10/01 22:49, , 40F
10/01 22:49, 40F
推
10/01 22:50, , 41F
10/01 22:50, 41F
推
10/01 22:51, , 42F
10/01 22:51, 42F
→
10/01 22:51, , 43F
10/01 22:51, 43F
→
10/01 22:51, , 44F
10/01 22:51, 44F
推
10/01 22:54, , 45F
10/01 22:54, 45F
→
10/01 22:55, , 46F
10/01 22:55, 46F
→
10/01 22:56, , 47F
10/01 22:56, 47F
→
10/01 22:57, , 48F
10/01 22:57, 48F
→
10/01 22:58, , 49F
10/01 22:58, 49F
→
10/01 23:16, , 50F
10/01 23:16, 50F
推
10/01 23:52, , 51F
10/01 23:52, 51F
→
10/02 00:08, , 52F
10/02 00:08, 52F
→
10/02 01:00, , 53F
10/02 01:00, 53F
推
10/02 01:00, , 54F
10/02 01:00, 54F
→
10/02 01:01, , 55F
10/02 01:01, 55F
→
10/02 01:01, , 56F
10/02 01:01, 56F
→
10/02 01:10, , 57F
10/02 01:10, 57F
→
10/02 01:10, , 58F
10/02 01:10, 58F
→
10/02 01:11, , 59F
10/02 01:11, 59F
→
10/02 01:14, , 60F
10/02 01:14, 60F
→
10/02 01:15, , 61F
10/02 01:15, 61F
→
10/02 01:16, , 62F
10/02 01:16, 62F
推
10/02 07:04, , 63F
10/02 07:04, 63F
→
10/02 07:05, , 64F
10/02 07:05, 64F
推
10/02 08:51, , 65F
10/02 08:51, 65F
→
10/02 08:51, , 66F
10/02 08:51, 66F
推
10/02 10:13, , 67F
10/02 10:13, 67F
→
10/02 10:13, , 68F
10/02 10:13, 68F
推
10/02 21:09, , 69F
10/02 21:09, 69F
推
10/03 10:56, , 70F
10/03 10:56, 70F
→
10/03 10:56, , 71F
10/03 10:56, 71F
→
10/03 10:56, , 72F
10/03 10:56, 72F
→
10/03 22:02, , 73F
10/03 22:02, 73F
→
10/03 22:03, , 74F
10/03 22:03, 74F
推
10/04 01:56, , 75F
10/04 01:56, 75F
推
11/03 00:34, , 76F
11/03 00:34, 76F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):