Re: [討論] 對Sepat雙眼牆的見解(From國外學者)
※ 引述《ryanlin311 (ryan)》之銘言:
: 國外也注意到聖帕持續很長一段的雙眼牆觀測
: 以下是NRL(Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, USA)
: 的一些看法,其中聖帕內眼牆是否完全崩潰,在強度上可能也些
: 有不同的變化.其中Katrina就是很好的例子
: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
: Sepat provides another stunning example of the quandary facing the TC
: warning community.
面對熱帶氣旋警報上,有關令人困惑的現象,Sepat提供了另一個漂亮的例子
: 1. Double eyewalls create a secondary wind max, potentially at a much
: larger radius than the original single eyewall.
在雙眼牆結構上,在風力分布上有另一個強風區,可能在原來的眼牆外
有另一個半徑更大眼牆
: 2. If the inner eye collapses, the radius of max winds makes a step jump
: to a much larger radius.
若內眼牆崩潰,強風區的分布半徑會跳躍到外眼牆上
: 3. Even if the inner eye does not collapse, it typically becomes much
: weaker.
即使內眼牆沒崩潰,也會趨於減弱
: In both scenarios, the secondary eyewall and its associated high winds
: present a radically expanded wind field for those in its path during
: landfall. Coastal warnings, preparations and the expectations of all
: folks in the landfall region must realize that max winds will NOT be
: contained within the "typical" small inner core that encompasses 10s of
: km, but now can be multiple times larger in size.
在這兩個案例中,外眼牆和伴隨的環狀風場在登錄過程中,會讓警報和登陸地區的
民眾會發現到,最強的風力並不是環繞在數十公里大的內眼牆上,而是原先預期數
倍大
: Hurricane Katrina is the classic case, since it was in double eyewall
: mode at landfall and did NOT collapse the inner eye AND shrink the 2nd
: eyewall back to replace the inner eye prior to landfall.
颶風Katrina是一精典例子,在登陸時,內眼牆並沒崩潰且外眼牆也沒收縮而取代原
先的眼牆
: Thus, not only are we faced with the usual landfall timing and max
: intensity dilemmas, our need has now advanced to "what eyewall cycle
: stage will the storm be in at landfall"? This presents fascinating
: opportunities for research efforts on multiple fronts.
因此,不只我們要面對登陸的時機和強度的難題,並要思考在登陸時眼牆的結構
是哪樣?這議題是個迷人的機會去研究相關效應
: Best wishes to our friends in Taiwan.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.115.205.209
推
08/18 01:31, , 1F
08/18 01:31, 1F
推
08/18 01:32, , 2F
08/18 01:32, 2F
→
08/18 01:32, , 3F
08/18 01:32, 3F
推
08/18 01:34, , 4F
08/18 01:34, 4F
推
08/18 01:38, , 5F
08/18 01:38, 5F
XD手滑了 按錯了
→
08/18 01:39, , 6F
08/18 01:39, 6F
→
08/18 01:58, , 7F
08/18 01:58, 7F
※ 編輯: IanLi 來自: 140.115.205.209 (08/18 02:36)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 3 篇):