[請益] 個性保守還是愛風險人比較容易賺錢
我想問在金融市場,
你們自已或是周遭朋友同事當中,
到底是愛冒風險的人還是說生性保守的人,
比較能夠賺得到錢?
我也不清楚我的個性到底是比較保守還是比較愛冒風險?
大概只有在期貨市場這地方願意冒比較大的風險而已,
我從事的休閒活動都是靜態為主。
不愛做飆車、爬山、攀岩、到世界各地冒險等比較高風險的
娛樂活動。
或是看新聞或是網路上,有的人會去和老虎、鱷魚拍照時,
我都覺得這些人超猛的。
所以個性反映在投資策略上面,就是採取穩健成長,連op都很少碰。
不曉得你們呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.25.254.190
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Stock/M.1482161930.A.D2D.html
※ 編輯: acbwanatha (114.25.254.190), 12/19/2016 23:39:34
→
12/19 23:47, , 1F
12/19 23:47, 1F
推
12/19 23:50, , 2F
12/19 23:50, 2F
推
12/19 23:51, , 3F
12/19 23:51, 3F
推
12/19 23:53, , 4F
12/19 23:53, 4F
→
12/19 23:53, , 5F
12/19 23:53, 5F
推
12/19 23:56, , 6F
12/19 23:56, 6F
推
12/19 23:57, , 7F
12/19 23:57, 7F
→
12/19 23:57, , 8F
12/19 23:57, 8F
推
12/19 23:58, , 9F
12/19 23:58, 9F
推
12/19 23:58, , 10F
12/19 23:58, 10F
→
12/19 23:58, , 11F
12/19 23:58, 11F
→
12/19 23:58, , 12F
12/19 23:58, 12F
→
12/19 23:59, , 13F
12/19 23:59, 13F
→
12/19 23:59, , 14F
12/19 23:59, 14F
推
12/20 00:01, , 15F
12/20 00:01, 15F
→
12/20 00:01, , 16F
12/20 00:01, 16F
→
12/20 00:02, , 17F
12/20 00:02, 17F
→
12/20 00:03, , 18F
12/20 00:03, 18F
→
12/20 00:03, , 19F
12/20 00:03, 19F
推
12/20 00:05, , 20F
12/20 00:05, 20F
推
12/20 00:07, , 21F
12/20 00:07, 21F
推
12/20 00:08, , 22F
12/20 00:08, 22F
推
12/20 00:11, , 23F
12/20 00:11, 23F
→
12/20 00:12, , 24F
12/20 00:12, 24F
→
12/20 00:14, , 25F
12/20 00:14, 25F
推
12/20 00:15, , 26F
12/20 00:15, 26F
→
12/20 00:16, , 27F
12/20 00:16, 27F
→
12/20 00:17, , 28F
12/20 00:17, 28F
推
12/20 00:21, , 29F
12/20 00:21, 29F
→
12/20 00:21, , 30F
12/20 00:21, 30F
→
12/20 00:21, , 31F
12/20 00:21, 31F
→
12/20 00:21, , 32F
12/20 00:21, 32F
→
12/20 00:26, , 33F
12/20 00:26, 33F
→
12/20 00:27, , 34F
12/20 00:27, 34F
推
12/20 00:47, , 35F
12/20 00:47, 35F

→
12/20 00:47, , 36F
12/20 00:47, 36F
推
12/20 00:55, , 37F
12/20 00:55, 37F
→
12/20 01:01, , 38F
12/20 01:01, 38F
推
12/20 01:02, , 39F
12/20 01:02, 39F
噓
12/20 01:16, , 40F
12/20 01:16, 40F
推
12/20 01:25, , 41F
12/20 01:25, 41F
推
12/20 01:46, , 42F
12/20 01:46, 42F
→
12/20 01:47, , 43F
12/20 01:47, 43F
推
12/20 01:53, , 44F
12/20 01:53, 44F
噓
12/20 02:13, , 45F
12/20 02:13, 45F
→
12/20 02:13, , 46F
12/20 02:13, 46F
→
12/20 02:14, , 47F
12/20 02:14, 47F
→
12/20 02:14, , 48F
12/20 02:14, 48F
→
12/20 02:15, , 49F
12/20 02:15, 49F
推
12/20 04:35, , 50F
12/20 04:35, 50F
→
12/20 05:40, , 51F
12/20 05:40, 51F
推
12/20 08:25, , 52F
12/20 08:25, 52F
→
12/20 08:54, , 53F
12/20 08:54, 53F
→
12/20 08:55, , 54F
12/20 08:55, 54F
→
12/20 08:56, , 55F
12/20 08:56, 55F
推
12/20 09:01, , 56F
12/20 09:01, 56F
→
12/20 09:01, , 57F
12/20 09:01, 57F
→
12/20 09:04, , 58F
12/20 09:04, 58F
→
12/20 09:04, , 59F
12/20 09:04, 59F
→
12/20 09:06, , 60F
12/20 09:06, 60F
→
12/20 09:19, , 61F
12/20 09:19, 61F
推
12/20 11:37, , 62F
12/20 11:37, 62F
推
12/20 12:05, , 63F
12/20 12:05, 63F
推
12/20 12:15, , 64F
12/20 12:15, 64F
→
12/20 12:15, , 65F
12/20 12:15, 65F
→
12/20 14:09, , 66F
12/20 14:09, 66F
推
12/20 14:11, , 67F
12/20 14:11, 67F
推
12/20 16:56, , 68F
12/20 16:56, 68F
推
12/20 17:50, , 69F
12/20 17:50, 69F
推
12/20 21:43, , 70F
12/20 21:43, 70F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):