[心得] 你還在幻想陸資可以改變薪資結構?已回收
看到一大堆人在說 學生在反什麼,等到陸資來,到時候挖角開高薪,爽到的是他們
然後這些人又會說 反什麼服貿,台灣市場那麼小,根本沒辦法做生意,不去大陸
等著吃屎
每次看到這個我都覺得很奇怪,如果這是真的,這個自己人都鄙棄的小市場,
就常理判斷,根本就不會有人進來投資
論工資:大陸那邊的工人比你便宜
論土地:大陸那邊的土地也沒比你貴,又比你大
論環評:大陸那邊有在做環評嗎? 這邊還會有環保人士出來跟你抗爭
論市場:一邊是13億人口,一邊2000多萬人口
論國際化:一個上海就足夠打趴你台北和高雄
你看吧,台灣自己人都巴不得趕快過去對岸做生意,那怎麼會有人相信大量陸資會來台,
開公司,開工廠?????
還是大陸老闆腦袋想的都跟台灣老闆不一樣? 台灣老闆嫌棄的東西大陸老闆搶著要?
你說台灣有人才?
那我想問問看,到底是什麼樣的人才台灣有而大陸絕對找不到? 有可能嗎?
就算有這種人才好了,難道不會高薪挖到對岸去工作嗎?
為什麼一定要來台設公司工廠才可以用台灣的人才?
服貿開放陸資可以投資台灣,所以這樣就一定會有大量陸資來台?
我從來不知道這兩者是等號關係
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.198.188.143
噓
03/24 10:15, , 1F
03/24 10:15, 1F
推
03/24 10:15, , 2F
03/24 10:15, 2F
噓
03/24 10:15, , 3F
03/24 10:15, 3F
→
03/24 10:16, , 4F
03/24 10:16, 4F
→
03/24 10:16, , 5F
03/24 10:16, 5F
→
03/24 10:17, , 6F
03/24 10:17, 6F
→
03/24 10:18, , 7F
03/24 10:18, 7F
→
03/24 10:18, , 8F
03/24 10:18, 8F
所以我的論點是 那些贊成服貿的人深信台灣會被陸資大力投資 人人領高薪
然後股票上萬點 不是一件很奇怪的事情嗎?
我是反對服貿的 我不是689 謝謝
※ 編輯: tancos 來自: 114.198.188.143 (03/24 10:20)
→
03/24 10:19, , 9F
03/24 10:19, 9F
→
03/24 10:19, , 10F
03/24 10:19, 10F
→
03/24 10:19, , 11F
03/24 10:19, 11F
→
03/24 10:21, , 12F
03/24 10:21, 12F
推
03/24 10:22, , 13F
03/24 10:22, 13F
→
03/24 10:22, , 14F
03/24 10:22, 14F
→
03/24 10:22, , 15F
03/24 10:22, 15F
→
03/24 10:23, , 16F
03/24 10:23, 16F
→
03/24 10:23, , 17F
03/24 10:23, 17F
噓
03/24 10:27, , 18F
03/24 10:27, 18F
推
03/24 10:27, , 19F
03/24 10:27, 19F
推
03/24 10:33, , 20F
03/24 10:33, 20F
噓
03/24 10:34, , 21F
03/24 10:34, 21F
噓
03/24 10:34, , 22F
03/24 10:34, 22F
推
03/24 10:36, , 23F
03/24 10:36, 23F
→
03/24 10:36, , 24F
03/24 10:36, 24F
推
03/24 10:37, , 25F
03/24 10:37, 25F
推
03/24 10:38, , 26F
03/24 10:38, 26F
推
03/24 10:38, , 27F
03/24 10:38, 27F
→
03/24 10:38, , 28F
03/24 10:38, 28F
→
03/24 10:39, , 29F
03/24 10:39, 29F
→
03/24 10:40, , 30F
03/24 10:40, 30F
推
03/24 10:43, , 31F
03/24 10:43, 31F
→
03/24 10:43, , 32F
03/24 10:43, 32F
→
03/24 10:43, , 33F
03/24 10:43, 33F
→
03/24 10:45, , 34F
03/24 10:45, 34F
→
03/24 10:45, , 35F
03/24 10:45, 35F
→
03/24 10:46, , 36F
03/24 10:46, 36F
→
03/24 10:46, , 37F
03/24 10:46, 37F
推
03/24 10:47, , 38F
03/24 10:47, 38F
噓
03/24 10:49, , 39F
03/24 10:49, 39F
→
03/24 10:51, , 40F
03/24 10:51, 40F
推
03/24 10:51, , 41F
03/24 10:51, 41F
推
03/24 10:54, , 42F
03/24 10:54, 42F
推
03/24 10:56, , 43F
03/24 10:56, 43F
→
03/24 10:57, , 44F
03/24 10:57, 44F
→
03/24 10:58, , 45F
03/24 10:58, 45F
噓
03/24 11:07, , 46F
03/24 11:07, 46F
→
03/24 11:16, , 47F
03/24 11:16, 47F
→
03/24 11:18, , 48F
03/24 11:18, 48F
推
03/24 11:37, , 49F
03/24 11:37, 49F
→
03/24 11:40, , 50F
03/24 11:40, 50F
噓
03/24 11:43, , 51F
03/24 11:43, 51F
→
03/24 11:45, , 52F
03/24 11:45, 52F
→
03/24 11:45, , 53F
03/24 11:45, 53F
推
03/24 11:51, , 54F
03/24 11:51, 54F
→
03/24 11:53, , 55F
03/24 11:53, 55F
→
03/24 11:54, , 56F
03/24 11:54, 56F
→
03/24 11:55, , 57F
03/24 11:55, 57F
→
03/24 11:55, , 58F
03/24 11:55, 58F
推
03/24 11:57, , 59F
03/24 11:57, 59F
→
03/24 11:57, , 60F
03/24 11:57, 60F
→
03/24 11:58, , 61F
03/24 11:58, 61F
→
03/24 11:58, , 62F
03/24 11:58, 62F
→
03/24 11:58, , 63F
03/24 11:58, 63F
推
03/24 12:03, , 64F
03/24 12:03, 64F
→
03/24 12:03, , 65F
03/24 12:03, 65F
→
03/24 12:14, , 66F
03/24 12:14, 66F
→
03/24 12:15, , 67F
03/24 12:15, 67F
→
03/24 12:52, , 68F
03/24 12:52, 68F
噓
03/24 13:06, , 69F
03/24 13:06, 69F
→
03/24 15:17, , 70F
03/24 15:17, 70F
推
03/24 16:52, , 71F
03/24 16:52, 71F
→
03/24 16:52, , 72F
03/24 16:52, 72F
推
03/24 16:55, , 73F
03/24 16:55, 73F
→
03/24 16:55, , 74F
03/24 16:55, 74F
推
03/24 19:26, , 75F
03/24 19:26, 75F
推
03/24 22:47, , 76F
03/24 22:47, 76F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 12 篇):