Re: [情報] David Kim與玩家社群對遊戲平衡的問答
看板StarCraft作者berlinch2000 (壓抑自身威能)時間10年前 (2014/03/14 22:21)推噓48(55推 7噓 112→)留言174則, 42人參與討論串2/2 (看更多)
老實說
大家常常會罵大圍巾
但其實sc2其實已經很成功了
想想目前三族都有活著的空間
雖然每個時期的平衡都有所不同
但無可否認的是sc2確實有著sc1特色的新遊戲
這點我們需要給bz一些掌聲
但一直以來的缺點也不能忽視
1.部分單位的無用化(蟲族三本、航母、人類三本)
2.目前過度著重在保護發展至後期
3.蟲族單位操作性太低
sc2特別好的優點如下
1.追獵者、不朽、鳳凰、風暴雖然不夠全面,但整體設計都比前一代兵種好
2.胖胖雖然有點強,但也算是設計優秀的單位
3.醫療艇設計的十分優秀
4.感染蟲雖然改弱了,但就設計上來說十分cool
5.百生蟲及寄生王蟲都相當好,可惜後者平衡度相當難以調整
請大家給予這個時代相當難以生存的rts一些掌聲
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 219.85.170.105
推
03/14 22:22, , 1F
03/14 22:22, 1F
推
03/14 22:22, , 2F
03/14 22:22, 2F
→
03/14 22:23, , 3F
03/14 22:23, 3F
推
03/14 22:23, , 4F
03/14 22:23, 4F
推
03/14 22:24, , 5F
03/14 22:24, 5F
推
03/14 22:24, , 6F
03/14 22:24, 6F
噓
03/14 22:24, , 7F
03/14 22:24, 7F
其實我是蟲族玩家
可惜我真心覺得蟲族的設計沒有其他兩族來得有意思
噓
03/14 22:24, , 8F
03/14 22:24, 8F
還好,在我眼中其實SC2算很不錯了
→
03/14 22:25, , 9F
03/14 22:25, 9F
我覺得你說的對,但SC2也算不錯了
※ 編輯: berlinch2000 來自: 219.85.170.105 (03/14 22:27)
→
03/14 22:26, , 10F
03/14 22:26, 10F
→
03/14 22:28, , 11F
03/14 22:28, 11F
→
03/14 22:29, , 12F
03/14 22:29, 12F
推
03/14 22:29, , 13F
03/14 22:29, 13F
→
03/14 22:30, , 14F
03/14 22:30, 14F
噓
03/14 22:33, , 15F
03/14 22:33, 15F
推
03/14 22:36, , 16F
03/14 22:36, 16F
推
03/14 22:40, , 17F
03/14 22:40, 17F
→
03/14 22:42, , 18F
03/14 22:42, 18F
噓
03/14 22:46, , 19F
03/14 22:46, 19F
推
03/14 22:47, , 20F
03/14 22:47, 20F
→
03/14 22:47, , 21F
03/14 22:47, 21F
→
03/14 22:47, , 22F
03/14 22:47, 22F
推
03/14 22:56, , 23F
03/14 22:56, 23F
推
03/14 22:58, , 24F
03/14 22:58, 24F
推
03/14 22:58, , 25F
03/14 22:58, 25F
感染蟲的設計很好啊
技能
1.無消耗戰鬥單位
2.AOE攻擊定身技能
3.2人口換對方N人口 15秒
設計跟平衡是兩回事
你不能否定感染蟲很有特色
但平衡目前需要改善
噓
03/14 23:07, , 26F
03/14 23:07, 26F
→
03/14 23:07, , 27F
03/14 23:07, 27F
推
03/14 23:10, , 28F
03/14 23:10, 28F
噓
03/14 23:10, , 29F
03/14 23:10, 29F
→
03/14 23:11, , 30F
03/14 23:11, 30F
→
03/14 23:11, , 31F
03/14 23:11, 31F
※ 編輯: berlinch2000 來自: 219.85.170.105 (03/14 23:14)
→
03/14 23:12, , 32F
03/14 23:12, 32F
推
03/14 23:13, , 33F
03/14 23:13, 33F
推
03/14 23:15, , 34F
03/14 23:15, 34F
還有 100 則推文
推
03/15 11:33, , 135F
03/15 11:33, 135F
推
03/15 11:34, , 136F
03/15 11:34, 136F
→
03/15 11:35, , 137F
03/15 11:35, 137F
→
03/15 11:36, , 138F
03/15 11:36, 138F
→
03/15 11:38, , 139F
03/15 11:38, 139F
→
03/15 11:39, , 140F
03/15 11:39, 140F
→
03/15 11:40, , 141F
03/15 11:40, 141F
→
03/15 11:42, , 142F
03/15 11:42, 142F
→
03/15 11:42, , 143F
03/15 11:42, 143F
推
03/15 12:03, , 144F
03/15 12:03, 144F
推
03/15 12:08, , 145F
03/15 12:08, 145F
→
03/15 12:09, , 146F
03/15 12:09, 146F
→
03/15 12:10, , 147F
03/15 12:10, 147F
→
03/15 12:10, , 148F
03/15 12:10, 148F
→
03/15 12:11, , 149F
03/15 12:11, 149F
→
03/15 12:11, , 150F
03/15 12:11, 150F
→
03/15 12:11, , 151F
03/15 12:11, 151F
→
03/15 12:12, , 152F
03/15 12:12, 152F
→
03/15 12:12, , 153F
03/15 12:12, 153F
→
03/15 12:12, , 154F
03/15 12:12, 154F
→
03/15 12:14, , 155F
03/15 12:14, 155F
→
03/15 12:14, , 156F
03/15 12:14, 156F
→
03/15 12:14, , 157F
03/15 12:14, 157F
推
03/15 12:32, , 158F
03/15 12:32, 158F
→
03/15 12:34, , 159F
03/15 12:34, 159F
→
03/15 12:35, , 160F
03/15 12:35, 160F
→
03/15 12:36, , 161F
03/15 12:36, 161F
→
03/15 12:38, , 162F
03/15 12:38, 162F
→
03/15 12:38, , 163F
03/15 12:38, 163F
→
03/15 12:39, , 164F
03/15 12:39, 164F
→
03/15 12:39, , 165F
03/15 12:39, 165F
推
03/15 12:48, , 166F
03/15 12:48, 166F
推
03/15 12:48, , 167F
03/15 12:48, 167F
推
03/15 13:53, , 168F
03/15 13:53, 168F
→
03/15 13:53, , 169F
03/15 13:53, 169F
→
03/15 13:54, , 170F
03/15 13:54, 170F
→
03/15 13:55, , 171F
03/15 13:55, 171F
→
03/15 13:56, , 172F
03/15 13:56, 172F
→
03/15 22:42, , 173F
03/15 22:42, 173F
噓
03/16 13:30, , 174F
03/16 13:30, 174F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):