Re: [BOX ] Spurs 97:111 Thunder
我覺得Pop也許可以嘗試一下,讓Boban代替TD打先發頭五分鐘
防守端這兩人現在其實差不多,腳步跟不太上,再不濟也是吃犯規,
Boban勝在防守籃板比較好
以及Westbrook大概很難克制可以單挑巨人一對一的渴望,讓其他人看戲
進攻端TD中距離根本不出手也不打低位,Boban在肘區還有河田美紀男那招"轉身不跳投"
最重要的是Boban造犯規的能力其實相當好,
在開賽就製造對方禁區球員的犯規麻煩進而減少對方的上場時間
不然我還真看不出來用Agg + West 是要怎麼在籃板上搶贏
Adams/Ibaka/Kanter/Durant這種平均6'11的前場?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.233.93.6
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Spurs/M.1462761876.A.7D2.html
→
05/09 10:45, , 1F
05/09 10:45, 1F
TD也跟不上,West稍微跟得上然後禁區被二次進攻打爆,這...?
推
05/09 10:46, , 2F
05/09 10:46, 2F
這幾場幾乎都放投Ibaka
→
05/09 10:46, , 3F
05/09 10:46, 3F
重點是要讓對方禁區一開始就有犯規麻煩,就像我們這場碰到的依樣
→
05/09 10:47, , 4F
05/09 10:47, 4F
→
05/09 10:47, , 5F
05/09 10:47, 5F
推
05/09 10:48, , 6F
05/09 10:48, 6F
對對,故意讓西河一開始就進入自幹狀態XD
→
05/09 10:50, , 7F
05/09 10:50, 7F
※ 編輯: eureka98 (118.233.93.6), 05/09/2016 10:52:14
推
05/09 10:51, , 8F
05/09 10:51, 8F
→
05/09 10:51, , 9F
05/09 10:51, 9F
推
05/09 10:53, , 10F
05/09 10:53, 10F
是啊,只是覺得Agg在攻守兩端都負荷太大了
推
05/09 10:56, , 11F
05/09 10:56, 11F
→
05/09 10:57, , 12F
05/09 10:57, 12F
→
05/09 10:57, , 13F
05/09 10:57, 13F
→
05/09 10:58, , 14F
05/09 10:58, 14F
推
05/09 11:01, , 15F
05/09 11:01, 15F
→
05/09 11:07, , 16F
05/09 11:07, 16F
推
05/09 11:12, , 17F
05/09 11:12, 17F
→
05/09 11:13, , 18F
05/09 11:13, 18F
今年3/26,Agg,KL,TP休息,Boban先發搭配Diaw
看Box沒什麼感覺,不過youtube有剪該場Boban的表現(4分多鐘)
重點是有一個play是這個 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2deeioJRhT0
Boban撿到進攻籃板後在Adams/Ibaka/Roberson三個人包夾中硬灌
這個play出現在今天多好XD
推
05/09 11:22, , 19F
05/09 11:22, 19F
→
05/09 11:23, , 20F
05/09 11:23, 20F
推
05/09 11:25, , 21F
05/09 11:25, 21F
推
05/09 11:29, , 22F
05/09 11:29, 22F
推
05/09 11:29, , 23F
05/09 11:29, 23F
→
05/09 11:29, , 24F
05/09 11:29, 24F
→
05/09 11:29, , 25F
05/09 11:29, 25F
→
05/09 11:30, , 26F
05/09 11:30, 26F
推
05/09 11:30, , 27F
05/09 11:30, 27F
→
05/09 11:31, , 28F
05/09 11:31, 28F
→
05/09 11:31, , 29F
05/09 11:31, 29F
→
05/09 11:32, , 30F
05/09 11:32, 30F
→
05/09 11:32, , 31F
05/09 11:32, 31F
※ 編輯: eureka98 (118.233.93.6), 05/09/2016 11:33:09
還有 78 則推文
推
05/09 14:53, , 110F
05/09 14:53, 110F
→
05/09 14:53, , 111F
05/09 14:53, 111F
噓
05/09 15:53, , 112F
05/09 15:53, 112F
推
05/09 15:57, , 113F
05/09 15:57, 113F
推
05/09 16:25, , 114F
05/09 16:25, 114F
推
05/09 16:53, , 115F
05/09 16:53, 115F
→
05/09 16:54, , 116F
05/09 16:54, 116F
→
05/09 16:55, , 117F
05/09 16:55, 117F
→
05/09 16:57, , 118F
05/09 16:57, 118F
推
05/09 16:58, , 119F
05/09 16:58, 119F
→
05/09 16:58, , 120F
05/09 16:58, 120F
推
05/09 17:03, , 121F
05/09 17:03, 121F
→
05/09 17:07, , 122F
05/09 17:07, 122F
→
05/09 17:07, , 123F
05/09 17:07, 123F
推
05/09 17:13, , 124F
05/09 17:13, 124F
→
05/09 17:15, , 125F
05/09 17:15, 125F
→
05/09 17:16, , 126F
05/09 17:16, 126F
→
05/09 17:18, , 127F
05/09 17:18, 127F
推
05/09 17:18, , 128F
05/09 17:18, 128F
→
05/09 17:18, , 129F
05/09 17:18, 129F
→
05/09 17:20, , 130F
05/09 17:20, 130F
→
05/09 17:21, , 131F
05/09 17:21, 131F
推
05/09 17:34, , 132F
05/09 17:34, 132F
推
05/09 17:37, , 133F
05/09 17:37, 133F
→
05/09 17:38, , 134F
05/09 17:38, 134F
推
05/09 17:51, , 135F
05/09 17:51, 135F
→
05/09 17:51, , 136F
05/09 17:51, 136F
→
05/09 17:52, , 137F
05/09 17:52, 137F
噓
05/09 19:41, , 138F
05/09 19:41, 138F
推
05/09 20:51, , 139F
05/09 20:51, 139F
→
05/09 20:51, , 140F
05/09 20:51, 140F
→
05/09 20:51, , 141F
05/09 20:51, 141F
→
05/09 20:51, , 142F
05/09 20:51, 142F
→
05/09 20:51, , 143F
05/09 20:51, 143F
推
05/09 21:55, , 144F
05/09 21:55, 144F
推
05/09 22:00, , 145F
05/09 22:00, 145F
→
05/10 00:15, , 146F
05/10 00:15, 146F
推
05/10 12:14, , 147F
05/10 12:14, 147F
→
05/10 12:14, , 148F
05/10 12:14, 148F
推
05/10 14:23, , 149F
05/10 14:23, 149F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):