Re: [LIVE] At Trail Blazers
保羅保羅保羅 馬刺迷還是帕克迷有需要常常拿保羅來當榜樣嗎?
保羅入行是什麼聲勢? 逼近狀元的聲勢
帕克入行是什麼聲勢? 首輪末端不知名的一"撿"
保羅保證頂薪續約 帕克被馬刺殺價續約
成長? 進步? 數字都在下面了 自個兒看
得分助攻幾乎是年年穩定上升
跳投命中率雖不出色 但也算堪用 而且命中數也有上升
我不大清楚 要求一個入行八年幾乎年年有進步的球員還要更進一步 是怎麼回事?
是愛的教育嗎? 還是望子成龍望女成鳳?
如果有什麼明星球員在入行第八年 扣掉得分助攻都變多外 跳投還能大幅變準
麻煩請告訴我一下 我再恭恭敬敬地波一篇文 表示我的孤陋寡聞
YR G GS MIN FG% 3P% FT% STL BLK TO PF OFF DEF TOT AST PTS
01-02 77 72 29.4 .419 .323 .675 1.2 0.1 2.0 2.2 0.4 2.1 2.5 4.3 9.2
02-03 82 82 33.8 .464 .337 .755 0.9 0.0 2.4 2.1 0.4 2.2 2.6 5.3 15.5
03-04 75 75 34.4 .447 .312 .702 0.8 0.1 2.4 2.0 0.6 2.6 3.2 5.5 14.7
04-05 80 80 34.2 .482 .276 .650 1.2 0.1 2.7 2.1 0.6 3.1 3.7 6.1 16.6
05-06 80 80 33.9 .548 .306 .707 1.0 0.1 3.1 2.0 0.5 2.8 3.3 5.8 18.9
06-07 77 77 32.5 .520 .395 .783 1.1 0.1 2.5 1.8 0.4 2.8 3.2 5.5 18.6
07-08 69 68 33.5 .494 .258 .715 0.8 0.1 2.4 1.3 0.4 2.8 3.2 6.0 18.8
08-09 47 45 33.9 .481 .333 .805 0.9 0.1 2.5 1.3 0.5 2.5 2.9 6.7 20.5
02-03
By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts
Game 5.9 12.7 .464 .501 35% 5% 2.7 15.4
Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts
Jump 67% .428 40% 4% 7.3
Close 32% .647 29% 7% 5.3
Dunk 0% 1.000 67% 0% 0.1
Tips 0% 1.000 0% 0% 0.0
Inside 33% .651 30% 6% 5.4
03-04
By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts
Game 5.6 12.6 .448 .480 38% 5% 2.6 14.7
Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts
Jump 68% .398 48% 2% 6.8
Close 32% .649 26% 10% 5.3
Dunk 0% 1.000 100% 0% 0.0
Tips 0% 1.000 0% 0% 0.0
Inside 32% .651 26% 10% 5.3
04-05
By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts
Game 6.7 14.0 .482 .502 36% 7% 2.6 16.6
Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts
Jump 58% .405 45% 4% 6.5
Close 42% .633 30% 10% 7.4
Dunk 0% 1.000 0% 0% 0.0
Tips 0% .500 0% 0% 0.0
Inside 42% .633 29% 10% 7.5
05-06
By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts
Game 7.8 14.2 .548 .554 33% 7% 3.2 18.9
Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts
Jump 51% .415 41% 3% 6.0
Close 49% .699 28% 11% 9.7
Dunk 0% 1.000 0% 0% 0.1
Tips 0% .000 0% 0% 0.0
Inside 49% .700 28% 11% 9.7
06-07
By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts
Game 7.4 14.2 .520 .528 33% 6% 3.6 18.6
Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts
Jump 59% .442 40% 3% 7.4
Close 41% .650 27% 11% 7.6
Dunk 0% .000 0% 0% 0.0
Tips 0% .000 0% 0% 0.0
Inside 41% .650 27% 11% 7.6
07-08
By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts
Game 7.5 15.1 .494 .502 25% 7% 3.6 18.8
Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts
Jump 62% .419 31% 3% 7.9
Close 38% .640 19% 12% 7.3
Dunk 0% .000 0% 0% 0.0
Tips 0% .000 0% 0% 0.0
Inside 38% .640 19% 12% 7.3
08-09
By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts
Game 8.0 16.7 .483 .492 31% 8% 3.6 20.0
Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts
Jump 61% .420 31% 4% 8.5
Close 39% .602 31% 13% 7.9
Dunk 0% .000 0% 0% 0.0
Tips 0% .000 0% 0% 0.0
Inside 39% .602 31% 13% 7.9
都過了幾年了,冠軍賽MVP也拿了,系列賽比下Nash幾次了,成功抵抗Paul一次了
怎麼堂堂帕克在這板上受到的待遇 還跟當年吵著要換奇德的時候差不多?
就這麼不討人愛嗎......
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.168.111.33
推
03/02 22:56, , 1F
03/02 22:56, 1F
推
03/02 22:58, , 2F
03/02 22:58, 2F
推
03/02 22:58, , 3F
03/02 22:58, 3F
→
03/02 22:59, , 4F
03/02 22:59, 4F
→
03/02 22:59, , 5F
03/02 22:59, 5F
推
03/02 22:59, , 6F
03/02 22:59, 6F
→
03/02 23:00, , 7F
03/02 23:00, 7F
→
03/02 23:00, , 8F
03/02 23:00, 8F
→
03/02 23:00, , 9F
03/02 23:00, 9F
→
03/02 23:01, , 10F
03/02 23:01, 10F
推
03/02 23:02, , 11F
03/02 23:02, 11F
推
03/02 23:03, , 12F
03/02 23:03, 12F
推
03/02 23:03, , 13F
03/02 23:03, 13F
推
03/02 23:04, , 14F
03/02 23:04, 14F
推
03/02 23:05, , 15F
03/02 23:05, 15F
若我是八零年代湖人隊或賽爾提克隊的球迷
對我來說,渥錫就是渥錫,麥克海爾就是麥克海爾
我不會希望他們兩人變身成魔術或大鳥,也不會希冀他們接下兩位傳奇的棒子
渥錫 麥克海爾 乃至於帕克 馬努 雖然不及傳奇人物 但他們都是偉大隊伍的成功要角
→
03/02 23:05, , 16F
03/02 23:05, 16F
→
03/02 23:07, , 17F
03/02 23:07, 17F
→
03/02 23:08, , 18F
03/02 23:08, 18F
→
03/02 23:08, , 19F
03/02 23:08, 19F
※ 編輯: spree 來自: 118.168.111.33 (03/02 23:13)
推
03/02 23:13, , 20F
03/02 23:13, 20F
推
03/02 23:15, , 21F
03/02 23:15, 21F
推
03/02 23:17, , 22F
03/02 23:17, 22F
→
03/02 23:18, , 23F
03/02 23:18, 23F
→
03/02 23:18, , 24F
03/02 23:18, 24F
→
03/02 23:19, , 25F
03/02 23:19, 25F
→
03/02 23:19, , 26F
03/02 23:19, 26F
→
03/02 23:20, , 27F
03/02 23:20, 27F
推
03/02 23:23, , 28F
03/02 23:23, 28F
推
03/02 23:24, , 29F
03/02 23:24, 29F
推
03/02 23:25, , 30F
03/02 23:25, 30F
推
03/02 23:26, , 31F
03/02 23:26, 31F
推
03/02 23:34, , 32F
03/02 23:34, 32F
→
03/02 23:35, , 33F
03/02 23:35, 33F
推
03/02 23:35, , 34F
03/02 23:35, 34F
→
03/02 23:35, , 35F
03/02 23:35, 35F
→
03/02 23:36, , 36F
03/02 23:36, 36F
→
03/02 23:37, , 37F
03/02 23:37, 37F
推
03/02 23:41, , 38F
03/02 23:41, 38F
推
03/02 23:42, , 39F
03/02 23:42, 39F
推
03/03 00:10, , 40F
03/03 00:10, 40F
→
03/03 00:11, , 41F
03/03 00:11, 41F
推
03/03 00:42, , 42F
03/03 00:42, 42F
推
03/03 01:06, , 43F
03/03 01:06, 43F
推
03/03 01:24, , 44F
03/03 01:24, 44F
推
03/03 01:28, , 45F
03/03 01:28, 45F
→
03/03 01:30, , 46F
03/03 01:30, 46F
推
03/03 01:30, , 47F
03/03 01:30, 47F
推
03/03 09:45, , 48F
03/03 09:45, 48F
推
03/03 13:42, , 49F
03/03 13:42, 49F
→
03/03 13:43, , 50F
03/03 13:43, 50F
→
03/05 01:47, , 51F
03/05 01:47, 51F
→
03/05 20:41, , 52F
03/05 20:41, 52F
推
03/05 23:41, , 53F
03/05 23:41, 53F
→
03/05 23:41, , 54F
03/05 23:41, 54F
推
03/05 23:43, , 55F
03/05 23:43, 55F
→
03/05 23:44, , 56F
03/05 23:44, 56F
→
03/05 23:44, , 57F
03/05 23:44, 57F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 4 篇):