[心得]資訊業跟科技業的工程師,地位差很多
之前都在台北的資訊業工作
在資訊業中,PM專案經理最大,接著是SA系統分析,最後才是PG
在這個行業中,大家都想當SA、PM,SA就可以做Paper work的工作
然後就可以脫離寫程式,在這個行業中,PM薪水最高,其次SA,最後
才是小小的PG,PM或SA可以打PG的考績。
最近換到竹科當工程師。
突然發現角色變換了。RD跟SA系統應用是同一層次,最小的才是PM
薪水,當然RD最高
今天還聽到RD跟PM吵架。RD說:"你只會用嘴巴跟客戶說話,談事情,
只會做paper work,你根本一點技術也沒有嘛,你今天有本事的話,
程式就你來寫呀!"
這是我以前在資訊業完全不會看到的光景。
以前PG對PM都是很敬畏的
只能說不同的產業,身份就差超多的。
在科技業,大家都想轉RD,因為錢最多
在資訊業,大家都想升PM,因為錢最多
明明在二個產業都在做寫程式的工作,但二者的地位差距很大
在科技業,絕對不會有PM打RD考績這種事情。這種事情只有在資訊業才會出現
不過至少現在不會聽到有人跟我說,PG薪水少,要想辦法當SA、PM薪水才會多呀。
終於有被重視的感覺了。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.230.55.137
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Soft_Job/M.1426163054.A.EED.html
→
03/12 20:31, , 1F
03/12 20:31, 1F
推
03/12 20:31, , 2F
03/12 20:31, 2F
→
03/12 20:40, , 3F
03/12 20:40, 3F
→
03/12 21:21, , 4F
03/12 21:21, 4F
→
03/12 21:23, , 5F
03/12 21:23, 5F
推
03/12 21:27, , 6F
03/12 21:27, 6F
→
03/12 22:06, , 7F
03/12 22:06, 7F
推
03/12 22:06, , 8F
03/12 22:06, 8F
→
03/12 22:07, , 9F
03/12 22:07, 9F
→
03/12 22:07, , 10F
03/12 22:07, 10F
→
03/12 22:08, , 11F
03/12 22:08, 11F
→
03/12 22:08, , 12F
03/12 22:08, 12F
→
03/12 22:09, , 13F
03/12 22:09, 13F
→
03/12 22:10, , 14F
03/12 22:10, 14F
推
03/13 09:05, , 15F
03/13 09:05, 15F
→
03/13 09:05, , 16F
03/13 09:05, 16F
→
03/13 09:05, , 17F
03/13 09:05, 17F
→
03/13 09:05, , 18F
03/13 09:05, 18F
推
03/13 09:12, , 19F
03/13 09:12, 19F
→
03/13 09:12, , 20F
03/13 09:12, 20F
→
03/13 09:12, , 21F
03/13 09:12, 21F
→
03/13 12:13, , 22F
03/13 12:13, 22F
推
03/13 12:21, , 23F
03/13 12:21, 23F
→
03/13 12:22, , 24F
03/13 12:22, 24F
→
03/13 12:22, , 25F
03/13 12:22, 25F
→
03/13 12:23, , 26F
03/13 12:23, 26F
→
03/13 12:24, , 27F
03/13 12:24, 27F
→
03/13 12:25, , 28F
03/13 12:25, 28F
→
03/13 12:25, , 29F
03/13 12:25, 29F
→
03/13 13:54, , 30F
03/13 13:54, 30F
→
03/13 13:57, , 31F
03/13 13:57, 31F
→
03/14 00:17, , 32F
03/14 00:17, 32F
推
03/14 11:26, , 33F
03/14 11:26, 33F
→
03/14 11:26, , 34F
03/14 11:26, 34F
→
03/14 11:26, , 35F
03/14 11:26, 35F
→
03/14 11:26, , 36F
03/14 11:26, 36F
→
03/14 11:26, , 37F
03/14 11:26, 37F
推
03/14 11:29, , 38F
03/14 11:29, 38F
→
03/14 11:29, , 39F
03/14 11:29, 39F
→
03/14 12:26, , 40F
03/14 12:26, 40F
推
03/14 21:20, , 41F
03/14 21:20, 41F
→
03/14 21:21, , 42F
03/14 21:21, 42F
推
03/15 03:19, , 43F
03/15 03:19, 43F
→
03/15 03:20, , 44F
03/15 03:20, 44F
推
03/25 06:49, , 45F
03/25 06:49, 45F
→
03/25 06:50, , 46F
03/25 06:50, 46F
→
03/25 06:51, , 47F
03/25 06:51, 47F
推
03/25 06:53, , 48F
03/25 06:53, 48F
→
03/25 06:54, , 49F
03/25 06:54, 49F
→
03/25 06:55, , 50F
03/25 06:55, 50F
→
03/25 06:56, , 51F
03/25 06:56, 51F
推
03/25 06:59, , 52F
03/25 06:59, 52F
推
03/25 07:01, , 53F
03/25 07:01, 53F
→
03/25 07:01, , 54F
03/25 07:01, 54F
推
03/25 07:03, , 55F
03/25 07:03, 55F
→
03/25 07:04, , 56F
03/25 07:04, 56F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):