Re: [問題] 英文精通到底是什麼程度?消失
台灣有很奇妙的英文情節, 所以英文精通是因人而異的;
--S
世界菁英, 國籍種族不限, 從不覺得自己英文好到哪去
--A
對於會中文的ABC, 國際學校, 高中以前出去的, 可能覺得自己還行
對於有留學過名校的, 可能覺得自己算中等偏上吧, 但很怕某些定義上會不精準
僅次前兩者礙於現實未成行, 但長期用國外source或已在英文環境生活工作者
可能覺得自己勉強算精通. ex: CNN日常, 能以英文分析政評
--B
TOEIC 9xx以上也在托福或雅思取得高分, 能做到反射式口說, 可能覺得自己撐得上精通吧
--C
TOEIC金色, 口說+工作經驗能游刃於台灣各大公司的, 覺得自己應可算是精通吧
學校還不錯, 也覺得自己口說可以的, 覺得英文應該系統化學習, 可以溝通就好的人
對口說極有自信, 喜歡跟外國人交流 (通常有遊學或打工經驗) 但心裡知道前面高手多
--D
能應付職場, 解釋太複雜的東西需要查閱, 但工作無礙, 這可稱之為台灣數字平台的精通
HR或主管雇主英文程度不詳, 可是於面試過程中展現出英文口說的自信
所以面試官也不想跟你全英文面試而轉中文了, 也算數字平台的精通
於一般口說書信都無大礙, 但需要查閱的比例高了一點 (不是英文問題, 是邏輯問題)
操作英文系統也沒問題, 應該也算數字平台的精通
其實台灣職場可能D就算精通, C就是中流砥柱了, 多數人無法體會BA是嚴謹謙虛還是矯情
所以如果只是104/1111數字平台, 請大方填精通去面試吧, 以上分享
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.230.119.73
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Salary/M.1549864615.A.CBD.html
推
02/11 14:06, , 1F
02/11 14:06, 1F
→
02/11 14:06, , 2F
02/11 14:06, 2F
→
02/11 14:06, , 3F
02/11 14:06, 3F
→
02/11 14:06, , 4F
02/11 14:06, 4F
→
02/11 14:06, , 5F
02/11 14:06, 5F
→
02/11 14:06, , 6F
02/11 14:06, 6F
→
02/11 14:07, , 7F
02/11 14:07, 7F
→
02/11 14:07, , 8F
02/11 14:07, 8F
推
02/11 14:07, , 9F
02/11 14:07, 9F
→
02/11 14:07, , 10F
02/11 14:07, 10F
→
02/11 14:08, , 11F
02/11 14:08, 11F
→
02/11 14:08, , 12F
02/11 14:08, 12F
→
02/11 14:08, , 13F
02/11 14:08, 13F
→
02/11 14:08, , 14F
02/11 14:08, 14F
→
02/11 14:09, , 15F
02/11 14:09, 15F
→
02/11 14:09, , 16F
02/11 14:09, 16F
→
02/11 14:10, , 17F
02/11 14:10, 17F
推
02/11 15:03, , 18F
02/11 15:03, 18F
→
02/11 15:05, , 19F
02/11 15:05, 19F
推
02/11 15:06, , 20F
02/11 15:06, 20F
→
02/11 15:07, , 21F
02/11 15:07, 21F
推
02/11 15:29, , 22F
02/11 15:29, 22F
→
02/11 15:29, , 23F
02/11 15:29, 23F
→
02/11 15:37, , 24F
02/11 15:37, 24F
推
02/11 15:50, , 25F
02/11 15:50, 25F
→
02/11 15:50, , 26F
02/11 15:50, 26F
→
02/11 16:39, , 27F
02/11 16:39, 27F
→
02/11 16:39, , 28F
02/11 16:39, 28F
→
02/11 16:40, , 29F
02/11 16:40, 29F
→
02/11 16:41, , 30F
02/11 16:41, 30F
→
02/11 16:41, , 31F
02/11 16:41, 31F
噓
02/11 16:45, , 32F
02/11 16:45, 32F
→
02/11 16:45, , 33F
02/11 16:45, 33F
推
02/11 17:49, , 34F
02/11 17:49, 34F
推
02/11 18:46, , 35F
02/11 18:46, 35F
※ 編輯: qmqmqm (61.230.170.94), 02/11/2019 20:59:33
推
02/11 23:51, , 36F
02/11 23:51, 36F
推
02/12 00:10, , 37F
02/12 00:10, 37F
推
02/12 00:26, , 38F
02/12 00:26, 38F
→
02/12 00:26, , 39F
02/12 00:26, 39F
→
02/12 00:27, , 40F
02/12 00:27, 40F
推
02/12 10:00, , 41F
02/12 10:00, 41F
→
02/12 10:59, , 42F
02/12 10:59, 42F
→
02/12 11:06, , 43F
02/12 11:06, 43F
→
02/12 11:11, , 44F
02/12 11:11, 44F
→
02/12 11:11, , 45F
02/12 11:11, 45F
→
02/12 11:11, , 46F
02/12 11:11, 46F
→
02/12 11:11, , 47F
02/12 11:11, 47F
→
02/12 11:11, , 48F
02/12 11:11, 48F
→
02/12 11:15, , 49F
02/12 11:15, 49F
→
02/12 11:15, , 50F
02/12 11:15, 50F
→
02/12 11:15, , 51F
02/12 11:15, 51F
→
02/12 11:15, , 52F
02/12 11:15, 52F
→
02/12 11:15, , 53F
02/12 11:15, 53F
→
02/12 11:15, , 54F
02/12 11:15, 54F
→
02/12 11:15, , 55F
02/12 11:15, 55F
→
02/12 11:15, , 56F
02/12 11:15, 56F
→
02/12 11:15, , 57F
02/12 11:15, 57F
推
02/12 11:39, , 58F
02/12 11:39, 58F
推
02/12 12:45, , 59F
02/12 12:45, 59F
推
02/12 12:54, , 60F
02/12 12:54, 60F
推
02/12 22:27, , 61F
02/12 22:27, 61F
→
02/12 22:27, , 62F
02/12 22:27, 62F
推
02/12 23:46, , 63F
02/12 23:46, 63F
推
02/13 00:17, , 64F
02/13 00:17, 64F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 4 篇):
問題
42
89